Suppr超能文献

一项关于休克重症患者个体化血压目标与标准治疗对比的多中心随机对照试验试点研究。

A pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial on individualized blood pressure targets versus standard care among critically ill patients with shock.

作者信息

Panwar Rakshit, McNicholas Bairbre, Nita Ciprian, Gibberd Alison, Poulter Amber-Louise, Tauares Marcia, Ferguson Lauren

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.

School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2025 May 27;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40560-025-00798-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimizing relative hypotension, or mean arterial pressure (MAP) deficit, by targeting patients' own pre-illness MAP (individualized MAP) during vasopressor therapy is a potential strategy to improve outcomes among ICU patients with shock. We conducted a prospective, open label, parallel-group, pilot RCT to assess feasibility and safety of this intervention compared to standard care.

METHODS

Thirty-seven eligible patients, aged 40 years or older and receiving vasopressor support for shock, were randomly allocated to individualized MAP target (N = 17) or standard MAP target (N = 20) at two multidisciplinary ICUs in Australia and Ireland. Pre-specified endpoints were time-weighted average MAP-deficit (i.e., percentage difference between patients' pre-illness MAP and achieved-MAP), percentage time spent with > 20% MAP-deficit, major adverse kidney events (MAKE-14), 14-day and 90-day all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular adverse events within 28 days of randomization. All comparisons of efficacy outcomes were exploratory.

RESULTS

The median MAP-deficit and percentage time with > 20% MAP-deficit with individualized MAP vs. standard MAP were 7% [interquartile range: 2-16] vs. 18% [9-23] (p = 0.048), and 8% [0-43] vs. 53% [14-75] (p = 0.03), respectively. MAKE-14 (2/17 (12%) vs. 4/20 (20%), p = 0.67), 14-day mortality (1/17 (6%) vs. 3/20 (15%), p = 0.61), 90-day mortality (2/17 (12%) vs. 4/20 (20%), p = 0.67) and cardiovascular adverse events were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot RCT demonstrated that an individualized MAP target strategy was feasible to implement. No adverse safety signals were evident. These data and study procedures helped inform the design of a definitive RCT on the question of individualized MAP targets among critically ill patients with shock.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ACTRN12618000571279.

摘要

背景

在血管升压药治疗期间,通过将患者病前的平均动脉压(MAP)作为目标(个体化MAP)来尽量减少相对低血压或MAP不足,是改善ICU休克患者预后的一种潜在策略。我们进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、平行组、试点随机对照试验,以评估与标准治疗相比,这种干预措施的可行性和安全性。

方法

在澳大利亚和爱尔兰的两个多学科ICU中,将37名年龄40岁及以上且因休克接受血管升压药支持的合格患者随机分配至个体化MAP目标组(N = 17)或标准MAP目标组(N = 20)。预先设定的终点包括时间加权平均MAP不足(即患者病前MAP与实际达到的MAP之间的百分比差异)、MAP不足>20%的时间百分比、主要不良肾脏事件(MAKE-14)、14天和90天全因死亡率以及随机分组后28天内的心血管不良事件。所有疗效结果的比较均为探索性。

结果

个体化MAP组与标准MAP组相比,MAP不足中位数及MAP不足>20%的时间百分比分别为7% [四分位间距:2 - 16] 与18% [9 - 23](p = 0.048),以及8% [0 - 43] 与53% [14 - 75](p = 0.03)。两组的MAKE-14(2/17(12%)对4/20(20%),p = 0.67)、14天死亡率(1/17(6%)对3/20(15%),p = 0.61)、90天死亡率(2/17(12%)对4/20(20%),p = 0.67)和心血管不良事件相似。

结论

这项试点随机对照试验表明,个体化MAP目标策略实施起来是可行的。未发现明显的不良安全信号。这些数据和研究程序有助于为关于休克重症患者个体化MAP目标问题的确定性随机对照试验设计提供参考。

研究注册

ACTRN12618000571279。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4879/12107948/c4ca14021cdf/40560_2025_798_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验