Mosquera Freiser Eceomo Cruz, de la Rosa Caldas Mayerli, Naranjo Rojas Anisbed, Perlaza Claudia Lorena, Liscano Yamil
Grupo de Investigación en Salud Integral (GISI), Department of Health Sciences Faculty, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Cali 760035, Colombia.
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;12(5):591. doi: 10.3390/children12050591.
Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics have been documented to modulate the microbiota, enhance immunity, and reduce antibiotic resistance, making them a promising alternative in the management of acute otitis media (AOM). Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine their effectiveness in the prevention and treatment of AOM in patients.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2024 was conducted using Science Direct, PubMed, LILACS, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials, following PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and the meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 and Jamovi 2.3.28.
A total of 16 trials with 4034 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the intervention did not affect the time to AOM presentation (MD: -7.98; 95% CI: -19.74 to 3.78; = 0.18), the recurrence of the disease (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.74-1.33; = 0.96), or the requirement for antibiotics (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.84; = 0.13); however, it was associated with a reduced probability of developing AOM (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.96; = 0.02). Subgroup analysis suggests that the effect of probiotic supplementation on AOM incidence is influenced by treatment duration, patient age, and the number of probiotic strains in the product.
Supplementation with probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of AOM in children, although no significant impact was observed on other key clinical parameters. These interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy to conventional treatments; however, further high-quality, standardized trials are needed to confirm these findings and to define optimal protocols.
益生菌、益生元及合生元已被证明可调节微生物群、增强免疫力并降低抗生素耐药性,使其成为急性中耳炎(AOM)管理中有前景的替代方法。因此,本研究的目的是确定它们在预防和治疗患者AOM方面的有效性。
按照PRISMA指南,使用科学Direct、PubMed、LILACS、SCOPUS、科学网和Cochrane临床试验对2000年至2024年间发表的随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用Jadad量表评估方法学质量,并使用RevMan 5.4和Jamovi 2.3.28进行荟萃分析。
共纳入16项试验,涉及4034例患者。荟萃分析表明,干预措施对AOM出现时间(MD:-7.98;95%CI:-19.74至3.78;P=0.18)、疾病复发(RR:0.99;95%CI:0.74-1.33;P=0.96)或抗生素需求(RR:1.31;95%CI:0.92至1.84;P=0.13)没有影响;然而,它与发生AOM的概率降低有关(RR:0.80;95%CI:0.66至0.96;P=0.02)。亚组分析表明,补充益生菌对AOM发病率的影响受治疗持续时间、患者年龄和产品中益生菌菌株数量的影响。
补充益生菌、益生元或合生元与儿童AOM发病率显著降低相关,尽管未观察到对其他关键临床参数有显著影响。这些干预措施可被视为传统治疗的补充策略;然而,需要进一步的高质量、标准化试验来证实这些发现并确定最佳方案。