• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙泊酚-右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠-右美托咪定联合用药对经典喉罩置入成功率、血流动力学反应及咽喉部并发症影响的比较

Comparison of the Effects of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine and Thiopental-Dexmedetomidine Combinations on the Success of Classical Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertions, Hemodynamic Responses, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity.

作者信息

Çakırgöz Mensure, Demirel İsmail, Kar Aysun Afife, Alaygut Ergin, Saraç Ömürhan, Karagöz Emre, Demirel Oğuzhan, Akan Mert

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Izmir 35330, Turkey.

Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Firat University School of Medicine Hospital, Elazig 23119, Turkey.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 23;61(5):783. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050783.

DOI:10.3390/medicina61050783
PMID:40428741
Abstract

: Dexmedetomidine is a potent selective α receptor agonist with analgesic and sedative effects. Many reports indicate that compared to fentanyl, the combination of dexmedetomidine with propofol provides comparably acceptable conditions for a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). However, no study has evaluated the effectiveness of combined dexmedetomidine and thiopental in LMA insertions compared to that of combined dexmedetomidine and propofol. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine with thiopental or propofol on LMA insertion conditions, hemodynamic responses, and pharyngolaryngeal morbidity, which in this study was defined as the presence of postoperative sore throat, dysphagia, or visible blood in the airway following a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. : A total of 80 premedicated ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years were randomized to the propofol group (Group P, = 40) or thiopental group (Group T, = 40). Anesthesia was induced by infusing 1 μg·kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min followed by 2.5 mg·kg propofol or 5 mg·kg thiopental. LMA insertion conditions were evaluated on a scale assessing six variables. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index values were recorded at baseline; 1 min before; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after an LMA insertion. The baseline values for the systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) values were recorded before dexmedetomidine infusion. Measurements for all patients were then taken 1 min before and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min after the LMA insertion : Demographic data were similar between the groups. In Group P, the time to loss of eyelash reflex and LMA insertion time were significantly shorter, the apnea duration was significantly longer, and the rates of full jaw opening and optimal LMA insertion conditions were significantly higher when compared with those of Group T ( < 0.05). Group P showed a significantly greater percentage decrease in HR compared to that of Group T at 1 min before and 1, 2, and 3 min after the LMA insertion ( < 0.05). Group T had a greater decrease in SAP and MAP at 1 min before insertion, while the SAP decrease was lower in Group T at 3, 4, and 5 min after insertion. The MAP and DAP values after the LMA insertion showed a greater decrease in Group P compared to in Group T ( < 0.05). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly ( < 0.05) higher in Group P than in Group T. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the frequency of hypotension, sore throat, presence of blood, or dysphagia at discharge from the recovery unit ( > 0.05). : This study showed that the use of dexmedetomidine with thiopental provided comparably acceptable LMA insertion conditions with more stable hemodynamics compared to propofol.

摘要

右美托咪定是一种强效的选择性α受体激动剂,具有镇痛和镇静作用。许多报告表明,与芬太尼相比,右美托咪定与丙泊酚联合使用可为喉罩气道(LMA)提供相当可接受的条件。然而,与右美托咪定和丙泊酚联合使用相比,尚无研究评估右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠联合用于LMA置入的有效性。这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究旨在比较右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠或丙泊酚对LMA置入条件、血流动力学反应及咽喉部并发症的影响,本研究中咽喉部并发症定义为喉罩气道(LMA)置入后出现术后咽痛、吞咽困难或气道内可见血液。

总共80例年龄在18 - 65岁、已接受术前用药的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I - II级患者被随机分为丙泊酚组(P组,n = 40)或硫喷妥钠组(T组,n = 40)。麻醉诱导方式为在10分钟内输注1μg·kg右美托咪定,随后输注2.5mg·kg丙泊酚或5mg·kg硫喷妥钠。LMA置入条件通过评估六个变量的量表进行评价。在基线、LMA置入前1分钟以及置入后1、2、3、4和5分钟记录收缩压(SAP)、舒张压(DAP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和脑电双频指数值。收缩压(SAP)、舒张压(DAP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)和脑电双频指数(BIS)值的基线值在输注右美托咪定前记录。然后对所有患者在LMA置入前1分钟以及置入后1、2、3、4和5分钟进行测量。

两组间人口统计学数据相似。与T组相比,P组睫毛反射消失时间和LMA置入时间显著缩短,呼吸暂停持续时间显著延长,完全张口率和最佳LMA置入条件发生率显著更高(P < 0.05)。在LMA置入前1分钟以及置入后1、2和3分钟,P组HR下降百分比显著大于T组(P < 0.05)。T组在置入前1分钟时SAP和MAP下降幅度更大,而在置入后3、4和5分钟时T组的SAP下降幅度较小。LMA置入后P组的MAP和DAP值下降幅度大于T组(P < 0.05)。P组心动过缓发生率显著高于T组(P < 0.05)。在恢复室出院时,两组在低血压、咽痛、出血或吞咽困难的发生率方面无显著差异(P > 0.05)。

本研究表明,与丙泊酚相比,右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠联合使用可提供相当可接受的LMA置入条件,且血流动力学更稳定。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effects of Propofol-Dexmedetomidine and Thiopental-Dexmedetomidine Combinations on the Success of Classical Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertions, Hemodynamic Responses, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity.丙泊酚-右美托咪定与硫喷妥钠-右美托咪定联合用药对经典喉罩置入成功率、血流动力学反应及咽喉部并发症影响的比较
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 23;61(5):783. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050783.
2
Effects of Remifentanil and Dexmedetomidine with Propofol on Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion, Hemodynamic Stability, and Pharyngolaryngeal Morbidity: A Prospective Study of 80 Patients.瑞芬太尼和右美托咪定联合丙泊酚对喉罩置入、血流动力学稳定性及咽喉部并发症的影响:一项针对80例患者的前瞻性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2025 May 15;31:e948186. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948186.
3
Effects of propofol, etomidate, and thiopental on intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses in phacoemulsification by insertion of laryngeal mask airway.丙泊酚、依托咪酯和硫喷妥钠对喉罩置入超声乳化术中眼压及血流动力学反应的影响。
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;30(8):665-9. doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0165. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
4
The Effect of Adding Remifentanil to Thiopental for Anaesthesia Induction on the Success of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial.在硫喷妥钠麻醉诱导中添加瑞芬太尼对经典喉罩置入成功率的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 29;18(5):654. doi: 10.3390/ph18050654.
5
Propofol causes less postoperative pharyngeal morbidity than thiopental after the use of a laryngeal mask airway.使用喉罩气道后,丙泊酚引起的术后咽部并发症比硫喷妥钠少。
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):123-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000297292.84620.2c.
6
Laryngeal mask insertion during target-controlled infusion of propofol.靶控输注丙泊酚期间插入喉罩
J Clin Anesth. 2001 May;13(3):175-81. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00237-9.
7
Laryngeal mask insertion using thiopental and low dose atracurium: a comparison with propofol.使用硫喷妥钠和低剂量阿曲库铵插入喉罩:与丙泊酚的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Jul;46(7):670-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03013956.
8
The median effective dose of dexmedetomidine for laryngeal mask airway insertion with propofol 2.0 mg/kg.右美托咪定与2.0mg/kg丙泊酚联合用于喉罩置入的半数有效剂量。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Aug;58(7):815-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12338. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
9
Comparison of Anesthetics for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion: A Network Meta-Analysis.喉罩气道插入的麻醉比较:网络荟萃分析。
Anesth Prog. 2024 Jul 8;71(2):58-75. doi: 10.2344/22-00033.
10
Agents for facilitation of laryngeal mask airway insertion: a comparative study between thiopentone sodium and propofol.喉罩气道插入辅助剂:硫喷妥钠与丙泊酚的比较研究
Ann Afr Med. 2014 Jul-Sep;13(3):124-9. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.134405.

本文引用的文献

1
Airway Management During the Last 100 Years.气道管理近百年的发展历程。
Crit Care Clin. 2023 Jul;39(3):451-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.12.003. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation: A meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis.右美托咪定对气管插管时血流动力学反应的影响:荟萃分析与荟萃回归和试验序贯分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Sep;72:110287. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110287. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Comparing the safety and efficacy of three different doses of atracurium in facilitating the insertion of laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A randomized clinical trial.
比较三种不同剂量阿曲库铵在白内障超声乳化手术患者中辅助插入喉罩气道的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
Adv Biomed Res. 2020 Jul 27;9:28. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_61_19. eCollection 2020.
4
Comparative evaluation of i-gel insertion conditions using dexmedetomidine-propofol versus fentanyl-propofol - A randomised double-blind study.右美托咪定-丙泊酚与芬太尼-丙泊酚用于i-gel置入条件的比较评估——一项随机双盲研究
Indian J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;63(11):900-907. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_313_19. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
5
Perioperative adverse events attributed to α2-adrenoceptor agonists in patients not at risk of cardiovascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis.围手术期不良反应归因于 α2-肾上腺素受体激动剂在无心血管事件风险的患者中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):795-807. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.07.029. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Dexmedetomidine with propofol versus fentanyl with propofol for insertion of Proseal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.右美托咪定联合丙泊酚与芬太尼联合丙泊酚用于插入喉罩气道的比较:一项随机双盲临床试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):368-372. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_104_18.
7
Effect Of Midazolam Premedication On Doses Of Propofol For Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion In Children.咪达唑仑术前用药对儿童喉罩置入时丙泊酚用量的影响
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):98-101.
8
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine.右美托咪定的临床药代动力学与药效学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Aug;56(8):893-913. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7.
9
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine-Propofol versus Fentanyl-Propofol on Insertion Conditions of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway.右美托咪定-丙泊酚与芬太尼-丙泊酚用于双管喉罩气道插入条件的比较
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):UC06-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/23244.8934. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Effect of sex differences in remifentanil requirements for the insertion of a laryngeal mask airway during propofol anesthesia: A prospective randomized trial.丙泊酚麻醉期间插入喉罩气道时瑞芬太尼需求量的性别差异影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(39):e5032. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005032.