Kizilkurt Taha, Aydin Ahmet Serhat, Yagci Taha Furkan, Ersen Ali, Ercan Celal Caner, Salmaslioglu Artür
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medical School, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey.
Radiology Department, Medical School, Istanbul University, 34093 Istanbul, Turkey.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 14;61(5):894. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050894.
Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is a prevalent condition characterized by pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle. Various treatment options, including corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and saline injections, are utilized, yet their comparative efficacy remains unclear. This study hypothesizes that PRP injections result in superior functional and clinical outcomes compared to corticosteroid and saline treatments, as assessed by clinical scoring systems and radiological findings. The study enrolled patients aged 18 years and older with pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle persisting for at least three months and no prior treatment. Patients with comorbidities affecting the upper extremity were excluded. Fifty-five elbows from 50 patients were randomized into three groups (glucocorticoid, PRP, and saline). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Radiological evaluations included vascularity and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) indices via ultrasonography before injection and three months post-injection. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 36 patients (36 elbows, 16 males and 20 females; mean age 42.4 ± 6.15 years) for analysis. The glucocorticoid group included 13 elbows, PRP group 14 elbows, and saline group 14 elbows. Baseline functional and radiological scores were similar across groups. At three months, PRP and glucocorticoid groups showed no significant differences in VAS scores ( = 0.7), but PRP outperformed both of the other groups in DASH and PRTEE scores, with the saline group performing the worst ( < 0.001). PRP consistently achieved the best outcomes at both three and six months. Radiological assessments revealed no significant group differences in vascularity or SMI indices ( = 0.3 and = 0.2, respectively). PRP treatment demonstrated superior functional outcomes in early and mid-term evaluations compared to glucocorticoid and saline. However, ultrasonographic measures of vascularity and SMI did not correlate with functional outcomes. PRP offers a promising treatment option for lateral epicondylitis, with superior functional improvements over other commonly used injections. Radiological assessments of vascularity and SMI may not reliably predict clinical outcomes.
外侧上髁炎,俗称网球肘,是一种常见病症,其特征为外侧上髁处疼痛和压痛。人们采用了多种治疗方法,包括皮质类固醇、富血小板血浆(PRP)和生理盐水注射,但它们的相对疗效仍不明确。本研究假设,通过临床评分系统和影像学检查结果评估,与皮质类固醇和生理盐水治疗相比,PRP注射能带来更优的功能和临床效果。该研究纳入了年龄在18岁及以上、外侧上髁处疼痛和压痛持续至少三个月且未接受过先前治疗的患者。排除患有影响上肢合并症的患者。将来自50名患者的55个肘部随机分为三组(糖皮质激素组、PRP组和生理盐水组)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、患者自评网球肘评估(PRTEE)以及手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)问卷评估功能结果。影像学评估包括注射前及注射后三个月通过超声检查的血管分布和超微血管成像(SMI)指标。14名患者失访,最终纳入分析的有36名患者(36个肘部,16名男性和20名女性;平均年龄42.4±6.15岁)。糖皮质激素组有13个肘部,PRP组有14个肘部,生理盐水组有14个肘部。各组的基线功能和影像学评分相似。在三个月时,PRP组和糖皮质激素组的VAS评分无显著差异(P = 0.7),但在DASH和PRTEE评分方面,PRP组优于其他两组,生理盐水组表现最差(P < 0.001)。在三个月和六个月时,PRP组始终取得最佳效果。影像学评估显示,各组在血管分布或SMI指标方面无显著差异(分别为P = 0.3和P = 0.2)。与糖皮质激素和生理盐水相比,PRP治疗在早期和中期评估中显示出更优的功能效果。然而超声检查的血管分布和SMI指标与功能结果并无关联。PRP为外侧上髁炎提供了一种有前景的治疗选择,与其他常用注射治疗相比,其功能改善更显著。血管分布和SMI的影像学评估可能无法可靠地预测临床结果。