• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

进行胸外按压如何影响心算能力:一项随机交叉试验。

How Performing Chest Compressions Influences Mental Arithmetic Capabilities: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

作者信息

Holaubek Caroline, Maleczek Mathias, Scheidl Maximilian, Maleczek Anna, Frimmel Nikolaus, Goschin Julius, Roessler Bernhard

机构信息

Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Academic Simulation Center Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3366. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103366.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14103366
PMID:40429362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12112591/
Abstract

: Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is cognitively demanding, often requiring helpers to perform cognitive and manual tasks simultaneously. While the human brain primarily switches between tasks rather than processing them simultaneously, it remains unclear whether performing repetitive, monotonous manual tasks, such as chest compressions, affects cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the impact of chest compressions on mental arithmetic performance. : In a randomized crossover trial, healthy participants trained in advanced life support (physicians, nurses, and paramedics) completed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) under two conditions: with or without performing chest compressions on a manikin. The primary outcome was the number of correct PASAT answers. Secondary outcomes included workload assessment using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and chest compression (CC) performance. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and approved by the local ethics committee. : Thirty-eight participants were included. The number of correct PASAT responses was significantly lower during chest compressions compared to the control (36.5 vs. 41; < 0.01). NASA TLX values were significantly higher in the chest compression condition, indicating increased perceived workload. Chest compression performance showed statistically significant differences between a phase of just chest compressions and during the PASAT, especially increased levels of incomplete recoil. : This study demonstrates that even a simple repetitive motor task like chest compressions impairs cognitive task performance significantly. Furthermore, multitasking was shown to decrease chest compression quality. These findings strongly highlight the importance of effective task allocation and minimizing multitasking during CPR to optimize performance and thereby patient outcomes.

摘要

进行心肺复苏术(CPR)对认知要求较高,通常需要施救者同时执行认知和手动任务。虽然人类大脑主要是在任务之间切换,而非同时处理它们,但尚不清楚执行重复性、单调的手动任务,如胸部按压,是否会影响认知表现。本研究旨在评估胸部按压对心算表现的影响。

在一项随机交叉试验中,接受过高级生命支持培训的健康参与者(医生、护士和护理人员)在两种条件下完成了听觉连续加法测试(PASAT):对人体模型进行胸部按压或不进行胸部按压。主要结果是PASAT正确答案的数量。次要结果包括使用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(TLX)进行的工作量评估以及胸部按压(CC)表现。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,并获得当地伦理委员会的批准。

共纳入38名参与者。与对照组相比,胸部按压期间PASAT正确反应的数量显著更低(36.5对41;<0.01)。在胸部按压条件下,NASA TLX值显著更高,表明感知到的工作量增加。胸部按压表现显示,仅进行胸部按压阶段与进行PASAT期间存在统计学上的显著差异,尤其是不完全回弹水平增加。

本研究表明即使是像胸部按压这样简单的重复性运动任务也会显著损害认知任务表现。此外,多任务处理被证明会降低胸部按压质量。这些发现强烈凸显了在心肺复苏期间进行有效任务分配并尽量减少多任务处理以优化表现从而改善患者预后的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/a83ebe63c73a/jcm-14-03366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/dad237c75b1a/jcm-14-03366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/c17df120f529/jcm-14-03366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/9c3e53fe3f2b/jcm-14-03366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/a83ebe63c73a/jcm-14-03366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/dad237c75b1a/jcm-14-03366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/c17df120f529/jcm-14-03366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/9c3e53fe3f2b/jcm-14-03366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efbc/12112591/a83ebe63c73a/jcm-14-03366-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
How Performing Chest Compressions Influences Mental Arithmetic Capabilities: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.进行胸外按压如何影响心算能力:一项随机交叉试验。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3366. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103366.
2
The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.认知 - 运动多任务需求对心肺复苏中胸外按压质量的影响——一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;12:1536796. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1536796. eCollection 2025.
3
The effect of distraction by dual work on a CPR practitioner's efficiency in chest compression: A randomized controlled simulation study.双重任务分心对心肺复苏术实施者胸外按压效率的影响:一项随机对照模拟研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(43):e8268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008268.
4
Use of personal protective equipment and cognitive load during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - A randomized cross-over simulation-based study.心肺复苏过程中个人防护装备的使用与认知负荷——一项基于模拟的随机交叉研究
Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 20;23:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100936. eCollection 2025 May.
5
LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.与手动心肺复苏相比,在直升机救援中,LUCAS 更有效——一项前瞻性、随机、交叉模拟人研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;31(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
Assessment of the Quality of Manual Chest Compressions and Rescuer Fatigue in Different Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Positions.不同心肺复苏体位下手胸外按压质量及施救者疲劳度的评估
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2024 Dec;39(6):415-420. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X25000032. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
7
Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.胸壁减压不完全:急救医疗服务人员心肺复苏操作的临床评估及替代手动胸外按压-减压技术的评估
Resuscitation. 2005 Mar;64(3):353-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.10.007.
8
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
9
Optimal chest compression rate in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.心肺复苏中最佳胸外按压速率:一项使用人体模型的前瞻性随机交叉研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;23(4):253-257. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000249.
10
Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.在有无背板的不同柔软度表面上进行人工胸外按压与机械胸外按压的比较:一项随机交叉人体模型研究。
J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):594-600.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of cognitive-motor multitasking demands on the quality of chest compressions in CPR-A randomized controlled trial.认知 - 运动多任务需求对心肺复苏中胸外按压质量的影响——一项随机对照试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 19;12:1536796. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1536796. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of team leaders' position in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams on leadership behavior and team performance: A prospective randomized interventional cross-over simulation-based trial.心肺复苏团队中团队领导的职位对领导行为和团队表现的影响:一项前瞻性随机干预交叉模拟试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034235.
3
Team Strategies and Dynamics During Resuscitation.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2023 Aug;41(3):587-600. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 May 3.
4
Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer.在视动适应过程中,沉浸式虚拟现实会增加认知负荷,这与长期保持和情景转移的能力下降有关。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Oct 5;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01084-6.
5
High-Fidelity Simulation to Assess Task Load Index and Performance: A Prospective Observational Study.使用高保真模拟评估任务负荷指数和绩效:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Aug;50(4):282-287. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21234.
6
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration-task load index: NASA-TLX: evaluation of its use in surgery.美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数:NASA-TLX:在外科手术中的应用评估。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Nov;92(11):3022-3028. doi: 10.1111/ans.17830. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
The Myth of Multitasking and What It Means for Future Pharmacists.多任务处理的神话及其对未来药剂师的意义。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Nov;85(10):8267. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8267. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
8
Task Switching, Multitasking, and Errors: A Psychologic Perspective on the Impact of Interruptions.任务切换、多任务处理与错误:关于干扰影响的心理学视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;78(3):425-428. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.07.120.
9
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support.欧洲复苏理事会指南 2021:成人高级生命支持。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:115-151. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Multitasking behaviors and provider outcomes in emergency department physicians: two consecutive, observational and multi-source studies.急诊医师的多重任务行为和绩效:两项连续的观察性多源研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00824-8.