Holaubek Caroline, Maleczek Mathias, Scheidl Maximilian, Maleczek Anna, Frimmel Nikolaus, Goschin Julius, Roessler Bernhard
Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Academic Simulation Center Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 12;14(10):3366. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103366.
: Performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is cognitively demanding, often requiring helpers to perform cognitive and manual tasks simultaneously. While the human brain primarily switches between tasks rather than processing them simultaneously, it remains unclear whether performing repetitive, monotonous manual tasks, such as chest compressions, affects cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the impact of chest compressions on mental arithmetic performance. : In a randomized crossover trial, healthy participants trained in advanced life support (physicians, nurses, and paramedics) completed the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) under two conditions: with or without performing chest compressions on a manikin. The primary outcome was the number of correct PASAT answers. Secondary outcomes included workload assessment using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) and chest compression (CC) performance. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and approved by the local ethics committee. : Thirty-eight participants were included. The number of correct PASAT responses was significantly lower during chest compressions compared to the control (36.5 vs. 41; < 0.01). NASA TLX values were significantly higher in the chest compression condition, indicating increased perceived workload. Chest compression performance showed statistically significant differences between a phase of just chest compressions and during the PASAT, especially increased levels of incomplete recoil. : This study demonstrates that even a simple repetitive motor task like chest compressions impairs cognitive task performance significantly. Furthermore, multitasking was shown to decrease chest compression quality. These findings strongly highlight the importance of effective task allocation and minimizing multitasking during CPR to optimize performance and thereby patient outcomes.
进行心肺复苏术(CPR)对认知要求较高,通常需要施救者同时执行认知和手动任务。虽然人类大脑主要是在任务之间切换,而非同时处理它们,但尚不清楚执行重复性、单调的手动任务,如胸部按压,是否会影响认知表现。本研究旨在评估胸部按压对心算表现的影响。
在一项随机交叉试验中,接受过高级生命支持培训的健康参与者(医生、护士和护理人员)在两种条件下完成了听觉连续加法测试(PASAT):对人体模型进行胸部按压或不进行胸部按压。主要结果是PASAT正确答案的数量。次要结果包括使用美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(TLX)进行的工作量评估以及胸部按压(CC)表现。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,并获得当地伦理委员会的批准。
共纳入38名参与者。与对照组相比,胸部按压期间PASAT正确反应的数量显著更低(36.5对41;<0.01)。在胸部按压条件下,NASA TLX值显著更高,表明感知到的工作量增加。胸部按压表现显示,仅进行胸部按压阶段与进行PASAT期间存在统计学上的显著差异,尤其是不完全回弹水平增加。
本研究表明即使是像胸部按压这样简单的重复性运动任务也会显著损害认知任务表现。此外,多任务处理被证明会降低胸部按压质量。这些发现强烈凸显了在心肺复苏期间进行有效任务分配并尽量减少多任务处理以优化表现从而改善患者预后的重要性。