Suppr超能文献

皮肤寄居细菌在重建手术的术前皮肤准备中存活下来。

Skin-Dwelling Bacteria Survive Preoperative Skin Preparation in Reconstruction Surgery.

作者信息

Duffy Hannah R, Ashton Nicholas N, Stulce Porter, Blair Abbey, Farnsworth Ryan, Ormiston Laurel, Kwok Alvin C, Williams Dustin L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3417. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103417.

Abstract

Accurately determining the bacterial bioburden that survives preoperative skin preparation (PSP) is critical in understanding PSP efficacy and its limitations. Clinical PSP approval relies on a bacterial sampling method described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard E1173-15. Though common, this technique may overlook deep-dwelling skin bacteria. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that deep-dwelling skin flora would survive PSP, and more growth would be detected using a destructive sampling method compared with ASTM E1173-15. Twelve female participants with a scheduled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) artery flap procedure at the Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City, UT, were enrolled between January and August 2024. PSP was performed using three 26 mL ChloraPrep applicators (2% CHG), and excess tissue was collected. Bacteria in the skin were quantified using a destructive sampling method and ASTM E1173-15, and bioburden outcomes were compared. Two participants were excluded from the quantitative analysis. : Bacteria survived PSP in every participant. A greater diversity and more bacteria were quantified with destructive sampling than ASTM E1173-15 ( < 0.01). Generally, anaerobic bioburden values were higher than aerobic bioburden values. Higher bioburden correlated with processing more skin from a participant. Genotypic identification of select isolates identified and (formerly known as ) as surviving bacteria, among others. Immunofluorescence revealed bacteria in all skin layers. No participant exhibited clinical signs of infection in the abdominal region. Human data corroborated previous porcine data collected using destructive skin sampling after PSP. : Clinical PSP application does not create a sterile field. Destructive skin sampling techniques may be more effective than ASTM E1173-15 at resolving bacterial PSP survivors contributing to SSI risk.

摘要

准确测定术前皮肤准备(PSP)后存活的细菌生物负荷对于理解PSP的效果及其局限性至关重要。临床PSP的批准依赖于美国材料与试验协会(ASTM)标准E1173 - 15中描述的细菌采样方法。尽管这种技术很常见,但可能会忽略深层皮肤细菌。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:深层皮肤菌群能够在PSP后存活,并且与ASTM E1173 - 15相比,使用破坏性采样方法能检测到更多的细菌生长。2024年1月至8月期间,招募了12名计划在犹他州盐湖城亨斯迈癌症研究所进行腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣手术的女性参与者。使用三个26毫升的氯己定醇(2% CHG)涂抹器进行PSP,并收集多余组织。采用破坏性采样方法和ASTM E1173 - 15对皮肤中的细菌进行定量,并比较生物负荷结果。两名参与者被排除在定量分析之外。结果显示:每位参与者的PSP后均有细菌存活。与ASTM E1173 - 15相比(P < 0.01),破坏性采样定量出的细菌种类更多、数量更多。一般来说,厌氧生物负荷值高于需氧生物负荷值。更高的生物负荷与处理更多参与者的皮肤组织相关。对选定分离株的基因分型鉴定出 和 (以前称为 )等为存活细菌。免疫荧光显示所有皮肤层均有细菌。没有参与者在腹部区域表现出感染的临床症状。人体数据证实了之前在猪身上使用PSP后破坏性皮肤采样收集的数据。结论:临床PSP应用并不能创造一个无菌区域。在确定导致手术部位感染(SSI)风险的PSP后存活细菌方面,破坏性皮肤采样技术可能比ASTM E1173 - 15更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d9/12111911/1cb1cb5795a2/jcm-14-03417-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验