Hariharan Rohit, Mousa Aya, Menon Kirthi, Feehan Jack, Ukropcová Barbara, Ukropec Jozef, Schön Martin, Majid Arshad, Aldini Giancarlo, de Courten Maximilian, Cameron James, Bell Simon M, de Courten Barbora
Monash Centre for Health Research Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 26;18(5):630. doi: 10.3390/ph18050630.
Trends in global ageing underscore the rising burden of age-related cognitive decline and concomitant cardiometabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Carnosine, a naturally occurring dipeptide with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-glycating properties, has shown promise in animal models and limited human studies for improving cognitive function, insulin resistance and T2DM, but its therapeutic effects on cognition remain unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of carnosine on cognitive function in individuals with prediabetes or well-controlled T2DM. This is a secondary analysis of a double-blind randomised controlled trial (RCT), whereby 49 adults with prediabetes or early-stage well-controlled T2DM were randomised to receive 2 g of carnosine or identical placebo daily for 14 weeks. At baseline and follow-up, cognitive function was assessed as a secondary outcome using the Digit-Symbol Substitution Test, Stroop test, Trail Making Tests A & B, and the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB). In total, 42 adults (23 males and 19 females) completed the trial. There were no differences in participant anthropometry or cognitive functioning between carnosine and placebo groups at baseline (all > 0.1). After the 14-week supplementation period, there were no differences between carnosine and placebo groups in change and follow-up values for any cognitive measures including Stroop, Digit Symbol Substitution Sest, Trail Making A/B or CANTAB (all > 0.05). Adjustments for baseline cognitive scores, diabetic status, level of education, age or interaction effects with participants' sex did not change the results. Carnosine supplementation did not improve cognitive measures in individuals with prediabetes or T2DM in this study. While larger trials may provide further insights, alternative factors-such as the relatively young and healthy profile of our cohort-may have contributed to the lack of observed effect. Future research should examine individuals with existing cognitive impairment or those at higher risk of cognitive decline to better define the therapeutic potential of carnosine in this context.
全球老龄化趋势凸显了与年龄相关的认知衰退以及包括2型糖尿病(T2DM)在内的伴随而来的心脏代谢疾病负担不断加重。肌肽是一种天然存在的二肽,具有抗炎、抗氧化和抗糖化特性,在动物模型和有限的人体研究中显示出改善认知功能、胰岛素抵抗和T2DM的前景,但其对认知的治疗效果仍不明确。本研究的目的是评估肌肽对糖尿病前期或T2DM控制良好的个体认知功能的影响。这是一项对双盲随机对照试验(RCT)的二次分析,49名糖尿病前期或早期T2DM控制良好的成年人被随机分配,每天接受2克肌肽或相同的安慰剂,持续14周。在基线和随访时,使用数字符号替换测试、斯特鲁普测试、连线测验A和B以及剑桥自动化神经心理测试电池(CANTAB)对认知功能进行评估,作为次要结果。共有42名成年人(23名男性和19名女性)完成了试验。在基线时,肌肽组和安慰剂组在参与者人体测量学或认知功能方面没有差异(所有P>0.1)。在为期14周的补充期后,肌肽组和安慰剂组在任何认知指标(包括斯特鲁普、数字符号替换测试、连线测验A/B或CANTAB)的变化和随访值方面没有差异(所有P>0.05)。对基线认知分数、糖尿病状态、教育水平、年龄或与参与者性别的交互作用进行调整后,结果没有改变。在本研究中,补充肌肽并没有改善糖尿病前期或T2DM个体的认知指标。虽然更大规模的试验可能会提供进一步的见解,但诸如我们队列中相对年轻和健康的特征等其他因素可能导致了未观察到效果。未来的研究应该检查现有认知障碍的个体或认知衰退风险较高的个体,以更好地确定肌肽在这种情况下的治疗潜力。