Bahk Ji Hoon, Song Joo-Hyoun, Lim Young Wook, Park Cheolsoon, Lee Kee-Haeng
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.
Hip Pelvis. 2025 Jun 1;37(2):112-119. doi: 10.5371/hp.2025.37.2.112.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the only definitive treatment for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis (RDC). THA for RDC has significantly higher perioperative blood loss with a greater requirement for transfusion than non-RDC primary THAs. Given the rarity of the disease, this study aimed to investigate perioperative and long-term outcomes of cementless THA for RDC that developed from osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).
Each of 26 RDC patients was matched to a patient with typical advanced-stage ONFH for comparison, according to age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and the type of implant used. As a primary outcome, perioperative blood loss was calculated as the sum of compensated and uncompensated blood loss.
The RDC group had a significantly larger amount of total perioperative blood loss in comparison to the group with typical ONFH (791.5 mL vs. 511.2 mL, =0.034), which was primarily attributable to compensated blood loss (496.1 mL vs. 141.5 mL, =0.024), as uncompensated blood loss was not significantly different (=0.152). Intraoperative transfusion volume was significantly higher in the RDC group (234.6 mL vs. 46.2 mL, =0.007), while the difference in postoperative transfusion was marginally significant (=0.092).
THA for RDC was accompanied by a higher perioperative blood loss, attributable mainly to a significant difference in the amount of intraoperative transfusion, in a matched comparison with patients with typical advanced-stage ONFH. However, extended operation time and prolonged hospitalization along with a large volume of transfusion did not translate into inferior long-term outcomes.
全髋关节置换术(THA)是快速破坏性髋关节病(RDC)的唯一确定性治疗方法。与非RDC初次全髋关节置换术相比,RDC的全髋关节置换术围手术期失血量显著更高,输血需求更大。鉴于该疾病的罕见性,本研究旨在调查由股骨头缺血性坏死(ONFH)发展而来的RDC的非骨水泥全髋关节置换术的围手术期和长期结果。
根据年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分级和所用植入物类型,将26例RDC患者中的每例与一名典型晚期ONFH患者进行匹配以作比较。作为主要结局指标,围手术期失血量计算为代偿性和非代偿性失血量之和。
与典型ONFH组相比,RDC组围手术期总失血量显著更多(791.5 mL对511.2 mL,P = 0.034),这主要归因于代偿性失血(496.1 mL对141.5 mL,P = 0.024),因为非代偿性失血无显著差异(P = 0.152)。RDC组术中输血量显著更高(234.6 mL对46.2 mL,P = 0.007),而术后输血差异边缘显著(P = 0.092)。
与典型晚期ONFH患者进行匹配比较时,RDC的全髋关节置换术围手术期失血量更高,主要归因于术中输血量的显著差异。然而,延长的手术时间、延长的住院时间以及大量输血并未导致较差的长期结果。