Hardes Dvorak Jennifer
Law, https://ror.org/0489ggv38Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 May 28;53(2):1-12. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.10117.
This paper considers whether assisted suicide and euthanasia (AS/E) is an area for medical regulation or whether there is a better alternative regulatory mechanism to govern it. Drawing from empirical evidence across a range of jurisdictions where it is legalized, the paper argues that there are at least four good reasons to consider demedicalizing AS/E: (1) pragmatic ethical issues of infrastructural weakness in AS/E service provision in already overstretched healthcare systems globally; (2) challenges of medicalization; (3) regulatory complexities concerning medical law (including pharmaceutical law) and criminal law; (4) the risk that AS/E becomes more easily susceptible to healthcare economics. The paper suggests several recommendations concerning a possible "demedicalized model."
本文探讨协助自杀和安乐死(AS/E)是应由医学进行监管,还是存在更好的替代监管机制来对其进行管理。基于一系列已将AS/E合法化的司法管辖区的实证证据,本文认为至少有四个充分理由考虑使AS/E非医学化:(1)全球医疗系统本就不堪重负,AS/E服务提供方面存在基础设施薄弱这一务实的伦理问题;(2)医学化带来的挑战;(3)与医学法律(包括制药法)和刑法相关的监管复杂性;(4)AS/E更容易受到医疗保健经济学影响的风险。本文就可能的“非医学化模式”提出了若干建议。