• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices.对微生物培养结果待定的患者进行出院处理:安全性与最佳实践的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84905. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84905. eCollection 2025 May.
2
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.出院待随访检验结果的干预措施系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
3
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
4
Pending studies at hospital discharge: a pre-post analysis of an electronic medical record tool to improve communication at hospital discharge.出院时待开展的研究:一项关于电子病历工具改善出院沟通情况的前后对照分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):312-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3064-x. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
5
6
Evaluating the Follow-up of Post-discharge Positive Sterile Site Cultures and the Impact on Infection-Related Complications.评估出院后无菌部位培养阳性的随访情况及其对感染相关并发症的影响。
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Mar;12(3):989-996. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00786-1. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
A Pilot Study for Antimicrobial Stewardship Post-Discharge: Avoiding Pitfalls at the Transitions of Care.出院后抗菌药物管理的一项试点研究:避免医疗过渡阶段的陷阱。
J Pharm Pract. 2018 Apr;31(2):140-144. doi: 10.1177/0897190017699775. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Don't let go of the rope: reducing readmissions by recognizing hospitals' fiduciary duties to their discharged patients.紧握绳索:通过认识医院对出院患者的信托责任来减少再入院率。
Am Univ Law Rev. 2013;62(3):513-76.
9
10
Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care.待实验室检查和出院小结完成后,再将患者转至亚急性护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1583-7. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Start With the End: Early Hospital Discharge Planning as a Day-One Priority.从终点开始:将早期出院计划作为入院首日的首要任务。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):e87019. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87019. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of pharmacist-led microbiology result follow-up post-discharge for patients undergoing inpatient infectious diseases consultation.药师主导的出院后微生物学结果随访对接受住院传染病会诊患者的影响。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 7;4(1):e111. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.348. eCollection 2024.
2
Pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program in an urgent care setting.在紧急护理环境中由药剂师主导的抗菌药物管理计划。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jan 25;76(3):175-181. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxy023.
3
Interventions to Improve Follow-Up of Laboratory Test Results Pending at Discharge: A Systematic Review.改善出院时未决实验室检查结果随访的干预措施:一项系统综述
J Hosp Med. 2018 Sep;13(9):631-636. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2944.
4
A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.出院待随访检验结果的干预措施系统评价
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
5
Pending studies at hospital discharge: a pre-post analysis of an electronic medical record tool to improve communication at hospital discharge.出院时待开展的研究:一项关于电子病历工具改善出院沟通情况的前后对照分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):312-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3064-x. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.出院后微生物学结果返回并需要随访的发生率和预测因素。
J Hosp Med. 2011 May;6(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/jhm.895.
7
Pending laboratory tests and the hospital discharge summary in patients discharged to sub-acute care.待实验室检查和出院小结完成后,再将患者转至亚急性护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr;26(4):393-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1583-7. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
8
Medication reconciliation for reducing drug-discrepancy adverse events.用于减少药物差异不良事件的用药核对
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Sep;4(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.09.003.
9
Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge.出院后返回的检测结果引发的患者安全问题。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 19;143(2):121-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00011.

对微生物培养结果待定的患者进行出院处理:安全性与最佳实践的叙述性综述

Discharging Patients With Pending Microbiology Cultures: A Narrative Review of Safety and Best Practices.

作者信息

Bechir George, Bechir Angelina

机构信息

Hospital Medicine, Franciscan Health, Munster, USA.

Genetics, Clemson University, South Carolina, Clemson, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 May 27;17(5):e84905. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84905. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.84905
PMID:40433022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12110599/
Abstract

Discharging patients with pending microbiology culture results from the hospital has become a common practice aimed at improving hospital throughput and reducing length of stay. One of the main contributors to prolonged hospitalization is the delay in receiving finalized culture results, especially when patients are clinically stable and ready for discharge. Consequently, many hospitals have explored strategies to safely discharge patients before culture results are finalized. While this approach may help alleviate bed shortages and reduce healthcare costs, it raises important patient safety concerns. Finalized culture results may reveal pathogens or resistance patterns that necessitate changes in antimicrobial therapy. Without timely review and action, these findings can lead to missed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment, or avoidable readmissions. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on the safety, clinical impact, and system-level strategies associated with discharging patients with pending culture results. Studies show that 2%-11% of pending cultures in hospitalized patients require a change in clinical management, yet documentation of these pending results is often missing from discharge summaries, and follow-up responsibility is frequently unclear. Vulnerable populations, such as older adults and those discharged to subacute care facilities, are particularly at risk due to fragmented transitions and limited outpatient monitoring. Adverse outcomes in these groups include delayed therapy adjustments, inappropriate antimicrobial use, and increased healthcare utilization. To address these risks, several interventions have shown promise. These include electronic health record (EHR)-based alerts, pharmacist-led stewardship programs, and auto-populated discharge summary tools. When integrated into standardized discharge workflows and supported by institutional policy, these interventions improve follow-up rates and reduce harm. Systematic reviews of hospital discharge practices emphasize that multidisciplinary approaches, combining clinical teams, pharmacists, and care transition services, are most effective in ensuring timely review and response to finalized results. In conclusion, discharging patients with pending microbiology cultures can be safe when supported by structured systems that ensure results are reviewed and acted upon after discharge. Hospitals should implement protocols that clearly document pending tests, assign follow-up responsibility, and utilize EHR tools to facilitate communication. These strategies enhance both patient safety and operational efficiency during the vulnerable transition from inpatient to outpatient care.

摘要

让微生物培养结果待决的患者出院已成为医院的常见做法,旨在提高医院周转效率并缩短住院时间。住院时间延长的一个主要原因是收到最终培养结果的延迟,尤其是当患者临床状况稳定且准备出院时。因此,许多医院探索了在培养结果最终确定前安全让患者出院的策略。虽然这种方法可能有助于缓解床位短缺并降低医疗成本,但它引发了重要的患者安全问题。最终的培养结果可能揭示需要改变抗菌治疗方案的病原体或耐药模式。如果没有及时审查和采取行动,这些发现可能导致漏诊、治疗不优化或可避免的再次入院。这篇叙述性综述综合了当前关于让培养结果待决的患者出院的安全性、临床影响和系统层面策略的证据。研究表明,住院患者中2%-11%的待决培养结果需要改变临床管理,但出院小结中往往缺少这些待决结果的记录,后续责任也常常不明确。弱势群体,如老年人和那些出院后前往亚急性护理机构的人,由于转诊环节碎片化和门诊监测有限,尤其面临风险。这些人群的不良后果包括治疗调整延迟、抗菌药物使用不当以及医疗利用率增加。为应对这些风险,一些干预措施已显示出前景。这些措施包括基于电子健康记录(EHR)的警报、药剂师主导的管理计划以及自动填充的出院小结工具。当这些干预措施融入标准化出院流程并得到机构政策支持时,可提高后续跟进率并减少伤害。对医院出院实践的系统评价强调,结合临床团队、药剂师和护理转诊服务的多学科方法在确保及时审查和应对最终结果方面最为有效。总之,在有结构化系统支持的情况下,让微生物培养结果待决的患者出院可以是安全的,这些系统可确保出院后对结果进行审查并采取行动。医院应实施明确记录待决检查、指定后续责任并利用EHR工具促进沟通的方案。这些策略在从住院护理到门诊护理的脆弱过渡期间提高了患者安全和运营效率。