Dhungel Deepa, Bex Peter J, McCullough Aidan, Marín-Franch Iván, Vera-Diaz Fuensanta A
New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
North Eastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;66(5):40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.5.40.
Peripheral sensitivity to blur may contribute to refractive error development. We assessed blur discrimination in the near periphery in emmetropic children (six to eight years) at low risk (LR, n = 48) or high risk (HR, n =43) for myopia over three years.
A synthetic image with naturalistic image statistics was digitally blurred (pedestal blur) with either simulated defocus or primary spherical aberration (SA). One quadrant of the display was blurred by an additional amount (increment blur) and the subjects indicated that quadrant. Blur levels were adjusted using QUEST+ adaptive algorithm across three eccentricities (0°, 6°, 12°). Dipper functions were fit to proportions correct as a function of pedestal and increment blur to estimate intrinsic blur and blur criteria. Generalized mixed models were used to describe the effect of eccentricity, visit, and risk group on each blur measure.
There was no significant main effect of risk group, but intrinsic blur decreased significantly more over time in the HR group [defocus: -0.02 log (µm), P = 0.015; SA -0.03 log (µm), P = 0.005]. Intrinsic blur for defocus [0.11 log (µm), P < 0.001], but not SA, was higher for 6° than 0°. Intrinsic blur [defocus: 0.42 log (µm), P < 0.001; SA: 0.41 log (µm), P < 0.001], and blur criteria (defocus: 0.12 log, P < 0.001; SA 0.05 log, P = 0.001) were higher for 12° than 0°.
Peripheral blur perception is impaired by elevated intrinsic blur and higher discrimination criteria compared to central vision in children at LR and HR for myopia, with larger transition between 6° and 12° eccentricity. Peripheral blur perception does not appear to be a predictive factor in myopia risk in this small group of children.
周边对模糊的敏感度可能会导致屈光不正的发展。我们评估了三年内近视低风险(LR,n = 48)或高风险(HR,n = 43)的正视儿童(6至8岁)在近周边的模糊辨别能力。
具有自然图像统计特征的合成图像通过模拟散焦或初级球差(SA)进行数字模糊处理(基座模糊)。显示器的一个象限通过额外的量(增量模糊)进行模糊处理,受试者指出该象限。使用QUEST +自适应算法在三个偏心度(0°、6°、12°)上调整模糊水平。对正确比例作为基座和增量模糊的函数拟合斗函数,以估计内在模糊和模糊标准。使用广义混合模型来描述偏心度、就诊次数和风险组对每个模糊测量的影响。
风险组没有显著的主效应,但HR组的内在模糊随时间显著降低更多[散焦:-0.02 log(μm),P = 0.015;SA -0.03 log(μm),P = 0.005]。6°的散焦内在模糊[0.11 log(μm),P < 0.001]高于0°,但SA不是。12°的内在模糊[散焦:0.42 log(μm),P < 0.001;SA:0.41 log(μm),P < 0.001]和模糊标准(散焦:0.12 log,P < 0.001;SA 0.05 log,P = 0.001)高于0°。
与近视低风险和高风险儿童的中央视力相比,周边模糊感知因内在模糊升高和辨别标准更高而受损,在偏心度6°和12°之间有更大的转变。在这一小群儿童中,周边模糊感知似乎不是近视风险的预测因素。