Suppr超能文献

经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗癌症患者门静脉高压并发症的疗效

Outcomes of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for the management of portal hypertension complications in cancer patients.

作者信息

Khavandi Mohammad Mahdi, Nezami Nariman, Huang Steven, Tam Alda L, Abdelsalam Mohamed E, Shah Ketan Y, Patel Milan, Odisio Bruno C, Mahvash Armeen, Kuban Joshua D, Sheth Rahul A, Habibollahi Peiman

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX, Houston, USA.

Department of Interventional Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, DC, Washington , USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05013-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) or variations of portosystemic shunt creation procedure in cancer patients with portal hypertension (PHTN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was performed on cancer patients who underwent TIPS from September 2016 through June 2023. Forty consecutive cancer patients (mean age 61 years; 30 men, 10 women) were reviewed. For each patient, data regarding indication, the Child-Pugh (C-P) classification, international normalized ratio (INR), serum bilirubin level, creatinine level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score before the procedure and 1 month after the procedure were collected. Clinical efficacy was evaluated based on response, defined as the absence of significant variceal bleeding or clinically detectable ascites or hydrothorax following TIPS placement. Technical safety, complications, overall survival (OS), and incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) were also assessed.

RESULTS

One month after TIPS, 31 (77.5%) patients had clinical response, and 9 (22.5%) had no response. The technical success rate was 100%. There were no major procedure-related complications. The primary indications for shunt creation were ascites in 18 (45%), variceal bleeding (47.5%), and hydrothorax (7.5%). The 1-, 3-, and 6-month mortality rates were 10%, 25%, and 40%, respectively. Among the 40 patients included, 24 (60%) had cirrhosis, most commonly due to hepatitis C infection, hepatitis B infection, alcoholic liver disease, or NASH. The remaining 16 patients (40%) were non-cirrhotic. The median MELD score pre-TIPS was 11.5 (range 6.5-20.1). C-P score before intervention included 4 (10%) cases in class A, 33 (82.5%) in B, and 3 (7.5%) in C. The median OS was 15.4 months (range 0.03-61 months) and significantly differed by C-P score for each group (P < 0.001). No significant correlations existed between OS and the MELD score or pre-TIPS laboratory data. Fourteen patients developed HE (34%) after the procedure, and only one patient (2.5%) required shunt reduction. Responders had significantly longer OS, with a median of 26.5 months compared to 1.1 months in non-responders (P < 0.001, 95% CI: 2.14-13.19). Nine (22.5%) patients had a stent placed through the tumor. Twenty-six patients (65%) had an unchanged C-P class after the procedure, while C-P worsened in 6 (15%) and improved in 4 (10%).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that TIPS and its variations for the portosystemic shunt creation can be a safe and effective option for managing portal hypertension complications in carefully selected cancer patients with relatively preserved liver function. The study demonstrated high technical success and encouraging clinical response rates. Additionally, overall survival appeared longer in patients who responded to TIPS compared to non-responders.

摘要

目的

评估经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)或门体分流术创建程序的变体在门静脉高压(PHTN)癌症患者中的治疗效果。

材料与方法

对2016年9月至2023年6月期间接受TIPS治疗的癌症患者进行单中心回顾性研究。回顾了40例连续的癌症患者(平均年龄61岁;30例男性,10例女性)。收集每位患者术前及术后1个月的指征、Child-Pugh(C-P)分级国际标准化比值(INR)、血清胆红素水平、肌酐水平和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分等数据。根据反应情况评估临床疗效,反应定义为TIPS置入后无明显静脉曲张出血或临床可检测到的腹水或胸腔积液。还评估了技术安全性、并发症、总生存期(OS)和肝性脑病(HE)的发生率。

结果

TIPS术后1个月,31例(77.5%)患者有临床反应,9例(22.5%)无反应。技术成功率为100%。无重大手术相关并发症。分流术创建的主要指征为腹水18例(45%)、静脉曲张出血(47.5%)和胸腔积液(7.5%)。1个月、3个月和6个月的死亡率分别为10%、25%和40%。纳入的40例患者中,24例(60%)有肝硬化,最常见的原因是丙型肝炎感染、乙型肝炎感染、酒精性肝病或非酒精性脂肪性肝炎。其余16例患者(40%)为非肝硬化患者。TIPS术前MELD评分中位数为11.5(范围6.5 - 20.1)。干预前C-P分级中,A类4例(10%),B类33例(82.5%),C类3例(7.5%)。OS中位数为15.4个月(范围0.03 - 61个月),且每组C-P分级间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。OS与MELD评分或TIPS术前实验室数据之间无显著相关性。14例患者(34%)术后发生HE,仅1例患者(2.5%)需要减少分流。有反应者的OS明显更长,中位数为26.5个月,而无反应者为1.1个月(P < 0.001,95%CI:2.14 - 13.19)。9例(22.5%)患者的支架穿过肿瘤放置。26例患者(65%)术后C-P分级无变化,6例(15%)C-P分级恶化,4例(10%)改善。

结论

这些发现表明,TIPS及其门体分流术创建的变体对于精心挑选的肝功能相对保留的癌症患者管理门静脉高压并发症可能是一种安全有效的选择。该研究显示出高技术成功率和令人鼓舞的临床反应率。此外,与无反应者相比,对TIPS有反应的患者总生存期似乎更长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验