• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外技术后补片移位的评估:困难腹股沟疝补片固定与非固定的比较

Assessment of mesh displacement following laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal technique: comparing mesh fixation and non-fixation in difficult inguinal hernias.

作者信息

Yilmaz Abdullah Hilmi, Ulutas Mehmet Esref

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Van Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Süphan Mahallesi Hava Yolu Kavşağı 1. Kilometre EDREMIT/Van, Van, Türkiye.

Department of Surgery, Gaziantep City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Gaziantep, Türkiye.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02271-5.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02271-5
PMID:40434603
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesh fixation, one of the controversial issues of laparoscopic surgery, has not been investigated in the enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique. This study aimed to compare mesh fixation (FX) and non-fixation (NFX) in difficult cases in the eTEP technique.

METHODS

A total of 61 consecutive patients diagnosed with inguinal hernias who underwent the eTEP procedure were randomized for the study. The groups were FX and NFX. The primary outcome was mesh displacement; secondary outcomes were recurrence, return to normal life, pain, and postoperative findings.

RESULTS

Mesh displacement, recurrence, mean operative time, length of stay, pneumoperitoneum, and postoperative complications were similar. VAS scores were higher in the FX group (p = 0.017, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Return to normal life was more days in the FX group (p = 0.02). The mesh displacement at 6 months was higher than at 1 month in both groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no increased risk of mesh displacement and recurrence in difficult cases, such as scrotal and recurrent hernias, without mesh fixation. With the eTEP technique, mesh fixation can be safely avoided for less pain and a faster return to normal life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials number: NCT06417359.

摘要

背景

补片固定是腹腔镜手术中颇具争议的问题之一,目前尚未在增强视野完全腹膜外(eTEP)技术中进行研究。本研究旨在比较eTEP技术在困难病例中补片固定(FX)与非固定(NFX)的效果。

方法

连续61例诊断为腹股沟疝并接受eTEP手术的患者被随机纳入本研究。分为FX组和NFX组。主要结局是补片移位;次要结局是复发、恢复正常生活情况、疼痛及术后检查结果。

结果

补片移位、复发、平均手术时间、住院时间、气腹及术后并发症情况相似。FX组视觉模拟评分(VAS)更高(分别为p = 0.017、p < 0.001、p < 0.001)。FX组恢复正常生活所需天数更多(p = 0.02)。两组6个月时的补片移位均高于1个月时(p < 0.001)。

结论

在阴囊疝和复发性疝等困难病例中,不进行补片固定不会增加补片移位和复发风险。采用eTEP技术时,可安全避免补片固定,以减轻疼痛并更快恢复正常生活。

试验注册

临床试验编号:NCT06417359。

相似文献

1
Assessment of mesh displacement following laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal technique: comparing mesh fixation and non-fixation in difficult inguinal hernias.腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外技术后补片移位的评估:困难腹股沟疝补片固定与非固定的比较
Updates Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02271-5.
2
Prospective randomized study comparing mesh displacement in enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation.前瞻性随机研究比较增强型完全腹膜外与完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(无网片固定)中网片移位的情况。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2393-2401. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03181-y. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
3
A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair.一种使用增强型完全腹膜外(eTEP)技术的腹腔镜肌后疝修补的新方法。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1525-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.原发性腹直肌旁疝的腹膜内补片植入修补术(IPOM Plus)与扩大视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa修补术(eTEP-RS):一家三级医院50例病例的经验
Cureus. 2024 Apr 5;16(4):e57678. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57678. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Comparison of enhanced view-totally extraperitoneal technique and totally extraperitoneal technique in S1 scrotal hernia repair.S1型阴囊疝修补术中改良完全腹膜外技术与完全腹膜外技术的比较
Turk J Surg. 2025 May 30;41(2):147-153. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6669. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
6
Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with nonfixation of the mesh for 1,692 hernias.腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术,1692例疝未固定补片
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1241-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0137-0. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
7
A randomised control trial study of early post-operative pain and intraoperative surgeon workload following laparoscopic mesh repair of midline ventral hernia by enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus approach.一项关于通过增强视野完全腹膜外和腹膜内补片覆盖加 approach 法进行腹腔镜中线腹疝修补术后早期疼痛和术中外科医生工作量的随机对照试验研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jul-Sep;19(3):427-432. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_32_23.
8
IPOM versus eTEP as minimally invasive approaches for ventral/incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔内补片修补术(IPOM)与内镜经腹膜前修补术(eTEP)作为腹侧/切口疝的微创治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 14;29(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03319-6.
9
Comparing laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with and without mesh fixation.比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与有网片固定和无网片固定的疗效。
Ann Ital Chir. 2022;92:355-362.
10
Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias.比较机器人辅助完全腹膜外(eTEP)与腹膜内补片修补术(IPOM)治疗中线腹疝的手术成本和早期临床结果。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11319-3. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective randomized study comparing mesh displacement in enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation.前瞻性随机研究比较增强型完全腹膜外与完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(无网片固定)中网片移位的情况。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2393-2401. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03181-y. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Efficacy and safety of mesh non-fixation in patients undergoing laparo-endoscopic repair of groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.网片非固定在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1415-1427. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02919-4. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.
国际疝外科学院腹股沟疝管理指南更新。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080.
4
Feasibility and safety of redo laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia following previous endolaparoscopic repair.既往腹腔镜修补术后复发性腹股沟疝再次行腹腔镜修补术的可行性与安全性。
J Minim Access Surg. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):67-73. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_22_23. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
5
Mesh Fixation Versus Nonfixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中网片固定与非固定的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am Surg. 2024 Jan;90(1):111-121. doi: 10.1177/00031348231192066. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Extended Total Extraperitoneal Repair Versus Standard Total Extraperitoneal Repair and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernias.腹股沟疝的完全腹膜外修补术与标准完全腹膜外修补术和经腹腹膜前修补术的对比评价。
JSLS. 2023 Apr-Jun;27(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00004.
7
Mesh shrinkage after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后网片收缩。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 8;13(1):3894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31088-8.
8
Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年人腹股沟疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2457-2463. doi: 10.1111/ans.18032. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
9
The effect of mesh fixation on migration and postoperative pain in laparoscopic TEP repair: prospective randomized double-blinded controlled study.网片固定对腹腔镜 TEP 修补术后迁移和疼痛的影响:前瞻性随机双盲对照研究。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02587-w. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
10
Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.开放式与腹腔镜网片修补原发性单侧单纯腹股沟疝的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7. Epub 2019 Jun 3.