• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临床乳腺检查进行乳腺癌筛查:南非的成本效益分析

Breast Cancer Screening Using Clinical Breast Examination: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for South Africa.

作者信息

Masuku Sithabiso D, Mandrik Olena, Mdege Noreen D, Mishra Gauravi, Muwonge Richard, Meyer-Rath Gesine, Lince-Deroche Naomi, Brennan Alan

机构信息

Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; SCHARR, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

SCHARR, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, Division of Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Sep;49:101127. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101127. Epub 2025 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101127
PMID:40435867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411605/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The World Health Organization emphasizes screening and early diagnosis to reduce advanced cancer incidence and mortality. In low-to-middle-income countries, breast cancer (BC) survival rates are low because of late detection. South Africa's policy recommends twice-yearly clinical breast examinations (CBEs) for asymptomatic women aged 40 to 69. We assessed the impact of scaling up CBE screening on mortality and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

Using trial data on downstaging, we compared the current baseline (5% coverage) with scenario 1 (25% coverage by year 5 [ie, 5% increase annually]) and scenario 2 (75% coverage by year 5, [ie, 17.5% increase annually]). A cohort model tracked women from screening to diagnosis, estimating downstaging's impact on BC cases over their lifetime. Costs from the healthcare payer's perspective are presented in 2022 US dollars.

RESULTS

Five-year screen detection rates were 2.39 and 2.08 per 1000 women screened for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. Scenario 1 reduced BC mortality by 0.7% and scenario 2 by 2.3%. Compared with no screening, the current baseline screening program averts 1645 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) at $20 341/DALY averted. Scenario 1 averted 3823 DALYs with economic efficiency improving to $17 776/DALY averted, whereas scenario 2 averted 12 165 DALYs at $19 552/DALY averted.

CONCLUSIONS

CBE scale-up effectively saves life years but is not cost-effective under the country's opportunity cost-derived threshold of $3015/DALY averted. However, decisions on the best screening policy are not solely based on cost-effectiveness. They involve careful consideration of budgetary constraints and competing healthcare priorities. Scale-up should consider system capacity, minimum care standards and cost-effective early detection strategies.

摘要

目标

世界卫生组织强调筛查和早期诊断,以降低晚期癌症的发病率和死亡率。在中低收入国家,由于发现较晚,乳腺癌(BC)的生存率较低。南非的政策建议对40至69岁无症状女性进行每年两次的临床乳房检查(CBE)。我们评估了扩大CBE筛查对死亡率和成本效益的影响。

方法

利用关于疾病降期的试验数据,我们将当前基线(覆盖率5%)与方案1(到第5年覆盖率达到25%[即每年增加5%])和方案2(到第5年覆盖率达到75%[即每年增加17.5%])进行了比较。一个队列模型追踪女性从筛查到诊断的过程,估计疾病降期对其一生中BC病例的影响。从医疗保健支付者角度计算的成本以2022年美元表示。

结果

方案1和方案2每1000名接受筛查的女性的五年筛查检出率分别为2.39和2.08。方案1使BC死亡率降低了0.7%,方案2降低了2.3%。与不进行筛查相比,当前的基线筛查项目以每避免一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)花费20341美元的代价避免了1645个DALY。方案1避免了3823个DALY,经济效率提高到每避免一个DALY花费17776美元,而方案2以每避免一个DALY花费19552美元的代价避免了12165个DALY。

结论

扩大CBE筛查能有效挽救生命年,但根据该国源自机会成本的每避免一个DALY 3015美元的阈值,其成本效益不佳。然而,关于最佳筛查政策的决策并非仅基于成本效益。它们需要仔细考虑预算限制和相互竞争的医疗保健优先事项。扩大筛查应考虑系统能力、最低护理标准和具有成本效益的早期检测策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/be0b155a3a7a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/a99cc3bb6d47/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/afc9e4a2d649/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/be0b155a3a7a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/a99cc3bb6d47/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/afc9e4a2d649/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a76/12411605/be0b155a3a7a/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening Using Clinical Breast Examination: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for South Africa.使用临床乳腺检查进行乳腺癌筛查:南非的成本效益分析
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Sep;49:101127. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101127. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Mammography in Canada.加拿大使用数字乳腺摄影进行乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52821.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
A cost-effectiveness analysis of South Africa's COVID-19 vaccination programme.南非 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2024 Aug 13;42(20):125988. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.036. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
8
Evaluation of antiretroviral regimen switching options in adults with HIV with sustained viral load non-suppression on dolutegravir, lamivudine, and tenofovir in eastern, central, southern, and western Africa: a modelling study.在东非、中非、南非和西非,对接受多替拉韦、拉米夫定和替诺福韦治疗但病毒载量持续未被抑制的成人HIV感染者抗逆转录病毒治疗方案转换选择的评估:一项模型研究
Lancet HIV. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(25)00068-2.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Indonesia.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jul;48:101112. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101112. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
10
Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.早期乳腺癌的激素疗法:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(26):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta11260.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of triennial screening with clinical breast examination: 14-years follow-up outcomes of randomized clinical trial in Trivandrum, India.临床乳房检查三年筛查的效果:印度特里凡得琅的随机临床试验 14 年随访结果。
Cancer. 2023 Jan 15;129(2):272-282. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34526. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Finding the optimal mammography screening strategy: A cost-effectiveness analysis of 920 modelled strategies.寻找最佳的乳腺 X 光筛查策略:对 920 种模型策略的成本效益分析。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Jul 15;151(2):287-296. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34000. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
3
Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage III Colon Cancer in South African Public Hospitals.
南非公立医院辅助化疗治疗 III 期结肠癌的成本效果建模。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Dec;7:1730-1741. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00279.
4
Effect of screening by clinical breast examination on breast cancer incidence and mortality after 20 years: prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial in Mumbai.临床乳房检查筛查对 20 年后乳腺癌发病率和死亡率的影响:孟买前瞻性、整群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 24;372:n256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n256.
5
Effectiveness of clinical breast examination as a 'stand-alone' screening modality: an overview of systematic reviews.临床乳房检查作为一种“独立”筛查方式的有效性:系统评价概述。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07521-w.
6
Development of a method to determine the cost of breast cancer treatment with chemotherapy at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.开发一种方法来确定南非开普敦格罗特舒尔医院乳腺癌化疗治疗的成本。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 30;110(4):296-301. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i4.14204.
7
Socio-economic inequalities in the multiple dimensions of access to healthcare: the case of South Africa.社会经济不平等与医疗保健多维度获取之间的关系:以南非为例。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8368-7.
8
Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for health care decision-making in South Africa.估算南非医疗保健决策的成本效益阈值。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Jun 1;35(5):546-555. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz152.
9
Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies.发表的每延人年成本效益研究中对 iDSI 参考病例的依从性。
PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0205633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205633. eCollection 2019.
10
Systematic reviews as a 'lens of evidence': Determinants of benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.系统评价作为“证据之镜”:乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害的决定因素。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Aug 15;145(4):994-1006. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32211. Epub 2019 Mar 14.