Marques Pedro, Blydt-Hansen Mackenzie, Takano Tomoko, Ferreira João Pedro, Tsoukas Michael A, Sharma Abhinav, Mavrakanas Thomas A
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Cardiovascular Research and Development Center (UnIC@RISE), Porto, Portugal.
Cardiorenal Med. 2025;15(1):462-483. doi: 10.1159/000546520. Epub 2025 May 28.
Diuretic resistance is commonly reported in acute heart failure (AHF), especially in patients presenting with impaired kidney function. Effective treatment strategies for promoting decongestion in this population remain unclear.
A systematic review using MEDLINE/Cochrane databases was performed from inception to January 2024, identifying randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including patients with diuretic resistance or at risk of diuretic resistance based on the presence of kidney dysfunction at study enrollment. Trials testing different pharmacological or invasive modalities compared to standard of care, placebo or an active comparator were considered. Data on decongestion-related outcomes, safety outcomes, and clinical outcomes up to 90 days were collected.
Among the 22 RCTs included, 6 trials involved 529 patients with established diuretic resistance, while 16 trials enrolled 1,913 patients at risk of diuretic resistance. Diuretic resistance was differently defined across studies and most trials focused on interventions targeting different sites of action along the renal tubules. The different treatment strategies demonstrated efficacy in promoting decongestion while being associated with a mild increase in creatinine and cystatin C. The use of appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics was able to promote decongestion across the spectrum of kidney dysfunction. The presence of baseline kidney dysfunction did not identify a population resistant to standard decongestive strategies.
Diuretic resistance is not accurately defined in AHF but is uncommon in patients treated with appropriately high doses of intravenous loop diuretics. The main therapeutic goal in the acute setting should focus on promoting decongestion instead of overemphasizing on mild changes in kidney-related biomarkers.
利尿剂抵抗在急性心力衰竭(AHF)中普遍存在,尤其是在肾功能受损的患者中。促进该人群消肿的有效治疗策略仍不明确。
从数据库建立至2024年1月,使用MEDLINE/Cochrane数据库进行系统评价,纳入随机临床试验(RCT),这些试验的受试者在入组时基于肾功能障碍存在利尿剂抵抗或有利尿剂抵抗风险。考虑比较不同药物或侵入性治疗方式与标准治疗、安慰剂或活性对照的试验。收集了与消肿相关的结局、安全性结局以及长达90天的临床结局数据。
在纳入的22项RCT中,6项试验涉及529例已确诊利尿剂抵抗的患者,而16项试验纳入了1913例有利尿剂抵抗风险的患者。不同研究对利尿剂抵抗的定义不同,大多数试验聚焦于针对肾小管不同作用部位的干预措施。不同的治疗策略在促进消肿方面显示出疗效,同时肌酐和胱抑素C略有升高。使用适当高剂量的静脉注射袢利尿剂能够在各种肾功能障碍患者中促进消肿。基线肾功能障碍的存在并不能确定对标准消肿策略耐药的人群。
AHF中利尿剂抵抗的定义不准确,但在接受适当高剂量静脉注射袢利尿剂治疗的患者中并不常见。急性情况下的主要治疗目标应侧重于促进消肿,而非过度强调与肾脏相关生物标志物的轻微变化。