Alran Léonie, Mac Grogan Gaëtan
Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologique, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologique, institut Bergonié, 229, cours de l'Argonne, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Ann Pathol. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2025.02.012.
Phyllodes tumors are rare breast tumors (0.3 to 1% of all breast tumors). They are fibro-epithelial neoplasms that can be benign, borderline, or malignant. The majority of phyllodes tumors are benign (60 to 75%). The diagnostic criteria for malignant phyllodes tumours are well defined in the 2019 WHO classification. Malignant phyllodes tumours are diagnosed when malignant heterologous elements are present (excluding well-differentiated liposarcoma) or when all of the five following features are present: marked nuclear pleomorphism, stromal overgrowth at 40× magnification (objective 4× and eyepiece 10× magnification), increased mitotic index (≥5 mitoses/mm; ≥10 mitoses/10 HPF), diffuse hypercellularity, and infiltrative borders. Distant metastases appear within five to eight years after the diagnosis of phyllodes tumour and occur in 16% of malignant phyllodes tumours. At the metastatic site, the stromal component is typically observed, with common metastatic locations being the lungs, bones, and heart. Strict adherence to the grading criteria of the 2019 WHO classification does not reliably predict the risk of metastatic recurrence, especially regarding the requirement for the simultaneous presence of all five adverse criteria. Several recent studies have challenged this notion, proposing new diagnostic criteria that, however, require validation in prospective studies before being implemented.
叶状肿瘤是一种罕见的乳腺肿瘤(占所有乳腺肿瘤的0.3%至1%)。它们是纤维上皮性肿瘤,可分为良性、交界性或恶性。大多数叶状肿瘤是良性的(60%至75%)。2019年世界卫生组织分类中对恶性叶状肿瘤的诊断标准有明确规定。当存在恶性异源性成分(不包括高分化脂肪肉瘤)或同时具备以下所有五个特征时,可诊断为恶性叶状肿瘤:明显的核多形性、40倍放大倍数下的间质过度生长(物镜4倍和目镜10倍放大)、有丝分裂指数增加(≥5个有丝分裂/毫米;≥10个有丝分裂/10个高倍视野)、弥漫性细胞增多以及浸润性边界。远处转移在叶状肿瘤诊断后的五至八年内出现,在16%的恶性叶状肿瘤中发生。在转移部位,通常可观察到间质成分,常见的转移部位是肺、骨和心脏。严格遵循2019年世界卫生组织分类的分级标准并不能可靠地预测转移复发风险,尤其是关于所有五个不良标准需同时存在的要求。最近的几项研究对这一观点提出了挑战,提出了新的诊断标准,然而,在实施之前需要在前瞻性研究中进行验证。