• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索越南患者在造血干细胞移植决策中经历的关系自主性:一项定性访谈研究

Exploring Relational Autonomy of Vietnamese Patients' Experiences in Decision-Making Regarding Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Qualitative Interview Study.

作者信息

Nguyen Thi Quyen, Le Thi Dung, Fan Sheng-Yu, Ke Li-Shan, Pham Thi Viet Huong, Kao Chi-Yin

机构信息

Phenikaa University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70185. doi: 10.1002/pon.70185.

DOI:10.1002/pon.70185
PMID:40437648
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) decisions for patients with hematologic malignancies are deeply intertwined with trust, doctor-patient communication, and interaction with family. Relational autonomy highlights how social relationships and cultural contexts influence patients' decisions, offering a crucial lens to understand this complex process.

AIMS

To understand the decision-making experience of adult patients with hematologic malignancies in Vietnam regarding HSCT through the lens of relational autonomy.

METHODS

Convenient and snowball sampling interviewed 22 adult patients diagnosed with hematologic malignancies who had accepted or refused HSCT. Online semi-structured interviews were conducted in Vietnam. Content analysis was applied to identify themes.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged: "coming to identify as a patient," "experiencing the influence of relational networks," and "hoping one's voice will be heard." Trust and communication with healthcare professionals, relationships with family members, and broader social networks were found to critically shape the decision-making process. Patients initiated their consideration of HSCT within a Vietnamese cultural framework while integrating external influences. Social networks profoundly affect patient autonomy, as patients continuously reflected on their views and engaged with others to maintain their final say in decisions. Participants' interpretation of their significant other's experiences supported and maintained their autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The HSCT decision-making process is shaped by the interplay of patients' personal experiences, trust, socio-cultural relationships, and surrounding support systems. Relational autonomy offers key insights into how patients use social networks and cultural backgrounds to navigate their treatment choices, emphasizing the importance of supportive environments that empower patients to make informed and autonomous decisions.

摘要

背景

血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)决策与信任、医患沟通以及与家人的互动紧密相连。关系自主性凸显了社会关系和文化背景如何影响患者的决策,为理解这一复杂过程提供了关键视角。

目的

通过关系自主性的视角,了解越南成年血液系统恶性肿瘤患者关于HSCT的决策经历。

方法

采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样法,对22名已接受或拒绝HSCT的成年血液系统恶性肿瘤确诊患者进行访谈。在越南进行在线半结构化访谈。应用内容分析法确定主题。

结果

出现了三个主题:“开始认同自己为患者”“体验关系网络的影响”以及“希望自己的声音被听到”。发现与医疗保健专业人员的信任和沟通、与家庭成员的关系以及更广泛的社会网络对决策过程具有关键影响。患者在越南文化框架内开始考虑HSCT,同时融入外部影响。社会网络深刻影响患者的自主性,因为患者不断反思自己的观点并与他人互动,以在决策中保持最终话语权。参与者对其重要他人经历的解读支持并维护了他们的自主性。

结论

HSCT决策过程受到患者个人经历、信任、社会文化关系和周围支持系统相互作用的影响。关系自主性为理解患者如何利用社会网络和文化背景来做出治疗选择提供了关键见解,强调了支持性环境的重要性,这种环境能使患者做出明智和自主的决策。

相似文献

1
Exploring Relational Autonomy of Vietnamese Patients' Experiences in Decision-Making Regarding Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Qualitative Interview Study.探索越南患者在造血干细胞移植决策中经历的关系自主性:一项定性访谈研究
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70185. doi: 10.1002/pon.70185.
2
"Ultimately, mom has the call": Viewing clinical trial decision making among patients with ovarian cancer through the lens of relational autonomy.“最终,妈妈说了算”:从关系自治的角度看待卵巢癌患者参与临床试验的决策。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):981-989. doi: 10.1111/hex.12691. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Relational autonomy in breast diseases care: a qualitative study of contextual and social conditions of patients' capacity for decision-making.乳腺疾病护理中的关系自主性:对患者决策能力的背景和社会条件的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3622-8.
4
Shared decision-making about autologous stem cell transplantation: A qualitative study of older patients and physicians.关于自体干细胞移植的共同决策:一项针对老年患者和医生的定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Feb;73(2):458-469. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19276. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Decision-making conflicts regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematological neoplasms: A descriptive qualitative study.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者造血干细胞移植决策冲突:一项描述性定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;72:102684. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102684. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
A Peer Support Intervention in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): The STEPP Proof-of-Concept Trial.一项针对接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的同伴支持干预措施:STEPP概念验证试验。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Dec;30(12):1217.e1-1217.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.022. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Experiences and Decision Making in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Sickle Cell Disease: Patients' and Caregivers' Perspectives.镰状细胞病造血干细胞移植中的经验与决策:患者与照护者的观点。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 May;24(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives.在乳腺癌治疗决策中的责任和所有权伦理:患者和外科医生观点咨询的三角测量。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1904-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.039. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
9
Ethical issues in communication of diagnosis and end-of-life decision-making process in some of the Romanian Roma communities.罗马尼亚一些罗姆社区中诊断沟通与临终决策过程中的伦理问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Aug;16(3):483-97. doi: 10.1007/s11019-012-9425-5.
10
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.