Liu Qian, Li Yan, Han Chao, Li Qi
Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Department of Psychiatry, Shandong Mental Health Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1510015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1510015. eCollection 2025.
The isolation treatment and special care of COVID-19 patients expose frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in treatment to more risks of infection exposure. Therefore, investigating the current status of personal protection KAP of HCWs in isolation wards and its influencing factors will be helpful in improving personal protection in major public health events.
Research data came from COVID-19 designated medical institutions in Shandong Province from October to December 2022, and were collected through questionnaire surveys. The questionnaire is self-designed and composed of general information questionnaire, KAP questionnaire and anxiety and depression questionnaire. Univariate factor analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to study the influencing factors of KAP of the research subjects.
In terms of KAP Scores, the mean knowledge score was 6.82 ± 1.6, with 85.60% scoring at a medium level or below. The attitude mean score was 27.56 ± 4.1, and 78.60% held a favorable disposition toward personal protection measures. For practice, the mean score was 44.44 ± 5.6, with approximately 30.86% demonstrating room for improvement. Univariate analysis indicated significant differences in knowledge scores among HCWs with varying numbers of personal protective equipment (PPE) trainings and levels of depression and anxiety ( ≤ 0.05). Attitude scores differed significantly based on depression and anxiety levels ( ≤ 0.05). Practice scores varied significantly according to occupation, work experience, cumulative working time in isolation wards, and PPE training frequency ( ≤ 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that increased PPE training frequency ( = 0.168, = 0.007) and lower anxiety levels ( = -0.256, ≤ 0.001) were associated with higher knowledge scores. Depression levels ( = -0.208, = 0.001) were negatively associated with attitudes. Longer medical experience ( = 0.132, = 0.029), more cumulative working time in isolation wards ( = 0.310, ≤ 0.001), and lower anxiety levels ( = -0.129, = 0.034) positively influenced practice scores.
In summary, for HCWs in isolation wards, increasing the frequency of protective training and reducing anxiety will improve their personal protection knowledge; alleviating depression will cultivate a positive attitude toward personal protection; and relieving anxiety, along with longer job tenure and working hours, were associated with enhanced protective behaviors.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者的隔离治疗和特殊护理使参与治疗的一线医护人员面临更多感染暴露风险。因此,调查隔离病房医护人员个人防护知识、态度和行为(KAP)的现状及其影响因素,将有助于在重大公共卫生事件中提高个人防护水平。
研究数据来自2022年10月至12月山东省COVID-19定点医疗机构,通过问卷调查收集。问卷为自行设计,由一般信息问卷、KAP问卷和焦虑抑郁问卷组成。采用单因素分析和多重线性回归分析研究研究对象KAP的影响因素。
在KAP得分方面,知识平均得分为6.82±1.6,85.60%的得分处于中等水平及以下。态度平均得分为27.56±4.1,78.60%的人对个人防护措施持积极态度。在行为方面,平均得分为44.44±5.6,约30.86%的人有改进空间。单因素分析表明,接受不同数量个人防护装备(PPE)培训的医护人员以及抑郁和焦虑水平不同的医护人员在知识得分上存在显著差异(P≤0.05)。态度得分根据抑郁和焦虑水平有显著差异(P≤0.05)。行为得分根据职业、工作经验、在隔离病房的累计工作时间和PPE培训频率有显著差异(P≤0.05)。多重线性回归分析显示,PPE培训频率增加(β=0.168,P=0.007)和焦虑水平降低(β=-0.256,P≤0.001)与更高的知识得分相关。抑郁水平(β=-0.208,P=0.001)与态度呈负相关。更长的医疗工作经验(β=0.132,P=0.029)、在隔离病房更多的累计工作时间(β=0.310,P≤0.001)和更低的焦虑水平(β=-0.129,P=0.034)对行为得分有积极影响。
综上所述,对于隔离病房的医护人员,增加防护培训频率和降低焦虑将提高他们的个人防护知识;减轻抑郁将培养对个人防护的积极态度;缓解焦虑以及更长的工作年限和工作时间与增强防护行为相关。