Schacht Hannes, Schramm Peter, Machner Björn, Laabs Björn-Hergen, Koch Philipp J, Jensen-Kondering Ulf, Neumann Alexander
Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Stroke Res Treat. 2025 May 21;2025:5538938. doi: 10.1155/srat/5538938. eCollection 2025.
Calcified cerebral emboli (CCEs) represent a rare cause of acute ischemic stroke and can pose technical challenges for neurointerventionalists. The few studies on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) of CCE to date show poor recanalization rates and unfavorable outcomes. This study is aimed at investigating the technical and clinical results concerning EVT of CCE compared with noncalcified cerebral emboli (NCCEs). All cases of EVT for acute stroke from January 2014 to December 2021 from a single center were analyzed retrospectively. Emboli with a maximum density of ≥ 130 Hounsfield units on preinterventional CT scans were considered calcified. Propensity score matching was performed to compare technical and clinical results between patients with CCE and NCCE. CCEs were present in 26 of 1004 cases (2.6%). Successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved less frequently in CCE (CCE: 62%, NCCE: 92%, = 0.009). Also, first-pass reperfusion was less common in CCE (CCE: 12%, NCCE: 46%, = 0.006). In CCE, infarct growth was more frequent (CCE: 81%, NCCE: 42%, = 0.004) and more severe ( = 0.005). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement after EVT was lower in CCE patients (CCE: median 2, range -23 to 20, interquartile range (IQR) 2.75; NCCE: median 5, range -8 to 17, IQR 11, = 0.008). First-pass reperfusion is less common in EVT of CCE. Also, there is a more frequent and severe infarct growth in CCE patients after EVT, which helps to understand the poorer clinical results. Thrombectomy devices optimized for CCE are desirable to improve outcomes in this subgroup of stroke patients.
钙化性脑栓塞(CCEs)是急性缺血性卒中的一种罕见病因,可能给神经介入医生带来技术挑战。迄今为止,关于CCE血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的少数研究显示再通率较低且预后不佳。本研究旨在调查与非钙化性脑栓塞(NCCEs)相比,CCE的EVT的技术和临床结果。回顾性分析了2014年1月至2021年12月来自单一中心的所有急性卒中EVT病例。介入前CT扫描最大密度≥130亨氏单位的栓塞被视为钙化性栓塞。进行倾向评分匹配以比较CCE和NCCE患者的技术和临床结果。1004例病例中有26例(2.6%)存在CCE。CCE患者成功再通(改良脑梗死溶栓分级[mTICI]≥2b)的频率较低(CCE:62%,NCCE:92%,P = 0.009)。此外,CCE患者首次通过再灌注的情况也较少见(CCE:12%,NCCE:46%,P = 0.006)。在CCE患者中,梗死灶扩大更频繁(CCE:81%,NCCE:42%,P = 0.004)且更严重(P = 0.005)。CCE患者EVT后美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分的改善较低(CCE:中位数2,范围-23至20,四分位间距[IQR]2.75;NCCE:中位数5,范围-8至17,IQR 11,P = 0.008)。首次通过再灌注在CCE的EVT中较少见。此外,CCE患者EVT后梗死灶扩大更频繁且更严重,这有助于理解较差的临床结果。为CCE优化的血栓切除装置有望改善这一亚组卒中患者的预后。