• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.妊娠期急性阑尾炎:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Visc Med. 2025 Apr 15:1-6. doi: 10.1159/000545862.
2
Appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy- a retrospective comparative study of 99 pregnant and 1796 non-pregnant women.妊娠合并疑似阑尾炎的阑尾切除术-99 例妊娠妇女和 1796 例非妊娠妇女的回顾性对比研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Oct 28;409(1):326. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03517-3.
3
Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a population-based study.经腹式与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗妊娠期急性阑尾炎的比较:基于人群的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6025-6031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10075-0. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
4
Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy.针对孕期疑似急性阑尾炎进行的94例阑尾切除术。
World J Surg. 2004 May;28(5):508-11. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7157-2. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
5
Appendectomy during pregnancy: rates, safety, and outcomes over a five-year period. A hospital-based follow-up study.孕期阑尾切除术:五年期间的发生率、安全性及结局。一项基于医院的随访研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2160629. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2160629.
6
Is there a difference between acute appendicitis in pregnant and non-pregnant women?孕妇与非孕妇急性阑尾炎有区别吗?
Ceska Gynekol. 2023;88(6):405-411. doi: 10.48095/cccg2023405.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy in pregnant patients: a review of 45 cases.孕妇腹腔镜阑尾切除术:45例病例回顾
Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1701-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0201-9. Epub 2008 Dec 5.
8
The impact of pregnancy on the accuracy and delay in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.妊娠对急性阑尾炎诊断准确性及诊断延迟的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Sep;27(13):1357-60. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.858321. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
Short-term outcome after appendectomy is related to preoperative delay but not to the time of day of the procedure: A nationwide retrospective cohort study of 9224 patients.阑尾切除术的短期预后与术前延误有关,但与手术时间无关:一项全国性回顾性队列研究,共纳入 9224 例患者。
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Safety of appendectomy during pregnancy in the totally laparoscopic age.全腹腔镜时代妊娠期阑尾切除术的安全性
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 Jun 15;24(2):68-75. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2021.24.2.68.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Surgery During Pregnancy: A Meta-Review and Quality Analysis Using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 Instrument.妊娠期腹腔镜手术:使用多系统评价评估(AMSTAR)2工具的Meta综述与质量分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):e63521. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63521. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Development of a nomogram for the prediction of complicated appendicitis during pregnancy.建立预测妊娠期复杂性阑尾炎的列线图。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 1;23(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02064-w.
3
Clinical Characteristics of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: 10-Year Experience at a Single Institution in South Korea.妊娠期急性阑尾炎的临床特征:韩国一家机构的10年经验
J Clin Med. 2023 May 4;12(9):3277. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093277.
4
Appendectomy during pregnancy: rates, safety, and outcomes over a five-year period. A hospital-based follow-up study.孕期阑尾切除术:五年期间的发生率、安全性及结局。一项基于医院的随访研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2160629. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2160629.
5
EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on appendicitis in pregnancy.EAES 快速指南:系统评价、荟萃分析、GRADE 评估以及基于证据的欧洲妊娠期阑尾炎推荐意见。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8699-8712. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09625-9. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
6
Prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠的早产预防。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Mar;4(2S):100551. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100551. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗妊娠期阑尾炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 May 3;31(5):637-644. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000943.
8
Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.孕激素预防流产的作用:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD013792. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013792.pub2.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
10
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.

妊娠期急性阑尾炎:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lochmanová Ivana, Zapletal Jan, Sehnal Borek, Waldauf Petr, Oliverius Martin

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Visc Med. 2025 Apr 15:1-6. doi: 10.1159/000545862.

DOI:10.1159/000545862
PMID:40438728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12113414/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During pregnancy, acute appendicitis is responsible for about two-thirds of nontraumatic surgical emergencies. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the group of pregnant patients differs from the group of the normal population in perioperative features and whether surgery during pregnancy affects its further course.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 1,054 patients who underwent surgery for signs of acute appendicitis. The cohort included 16 pregnant patients (1.5%), 6 patients (37.5%) in the first trimester, 10 patients (62.5%) in the second. Perioperative features of the groups were compared, and postoperative course of pregnancy was followed.

RESULTS

We discovered that pregnant patients had a higher ratio of negative appendectomies (25% vs. 5.3%, = 0.010) and shorter operating time (40 min vs. 51 min, = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, acute appendectomy in pregnancy is associated with a higher rate of negative appendectomy and shorter operating time. Due to the small number of pregnant patients in the group and the occurrence of only one first trimester miscarriage of unknown etiology, it is not possible to clearly draw conclusion about the impact of acute appendectomy on the further course of pregnancy and further investigation is needed.

摘要

引言

在孕期,急性阑尾炎约占非创伤性外科急症的三分之二。本研究旨在调查妊娠患者组在围手术期特征方面是否与正常人群组存在差异,以及孕期手术是否会影响其后续病程。

方法

我们回顾性分析了一组1054例因急性阑尾炎体征而接受手术的患者。该队列包括16例妊娠患者(1.5%),其中6例(37.5%)处于孕早期,10例(62.5%)处于孕中期。比较了两组的围手术期特征,并对妊娠的术后病程进行了跟踪。

结果

我们发现妊娠患者的阴性阑尾切除术比例更高(25%对5.3%,P = 0.010),手术时间更短(40分钟对51分钟,P = 0.013)。

结论

根据我们的数据,孕期急性阑尾切除术与更高的阴性阑尾切除术发生率和更短的手术时间相关。由于该组妊娠患者数量较少,且仅发生1例病因不明的孕早期流产,因此无法明确得出急性阑尾切除术对妊娠后续病程影响的结论,需要进一步研究。