Valente Joao P, Garrido Andre, Araujo Ricardo, Abadesso Clara
Pediatric Service, Child and Youth Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Amadora/Sintra - Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, EPE, Lisbon, PRT.
Research Department, Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear and Centro de Recursos Naturais e Ambiente (CERENA) Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, PRT.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 26;17(4):e83042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83042. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Objectives The prevalence of pediatric pain, either related to the child's hospital visit or because of diagnostic and/or therapeutical interventions, is of primordial importance in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). In this study, we evaluate the evolution of pain assessment and management in Portuguese PEDs over 11 years. Methods We prepared a questionnaire addressed to head physicians of 45 Portuguese PEDs in 2007 and statistically compared the responses to those provided in 2018, where we also posed these questions to nurse managers. Results Pain assessment in our cohort of Portuguese PEDs has significantly improved, namely, with the establishment of local protocols and widespread use of pain scales (from 52% to 93%, p = 0.03). However, effective adoption of pain management remains insufficient, as mild to moderate pain is still far from being universally treated (only 22% always use analgesia). Nonetheless, there seems to be adequate treatment of severe pain and respective common use of opioids, but correct practices were not generally adopted when specific types of pain were analyzed. Procedural sedation and analgesia have significantly increased but are not yet universally practiced. In the year 2018, about 88% of these inadequacies are reflected by the staff's perception that pain management remains suboptimal, and more training is needed. Conclusion The development of collective awareness and the institution of national guidelines for pediatric pain have helped to improve the conjuncture in Portuguese PEDs. However, a coordinated nationwide plan to promote local training and optimize knowledge translation is still lacking.
儿童疼痛的发生率,无论是与患儿就诊相关,还是因诊断和/或治疗干预所致,在儿科急诊科(PEDs)中都至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了葡萄牙儿科急诊科11年来疼痛评估与管理的演变情况。方法:我们于2007年编制了一份问卷,发给45家葡萄牙儿科急诊科的主任医师,并对其回复与2018年的回复进行统计学比较,2018年我们也向护士长提出了这些问题。结果:在我们的葡萄牙儿科急诊科队列中,疼痛评估有了显著改善,即通过制定当地方案和广泛使用疼痛量表(从52%增至93%,p = 0.03)。然而,疼痛管理的有效实施仍然不足,因为轻至中度疼痛远未得到普遍治疗(只有22%总是使用镇痛药)。尽管如此,重度疼痛似乎得到了充分治疗,阿片类药物也有相应的普遍使用,但在分析特定类型的疼痛时,正确的做法并未普遍采用。程序性镇静和镇痛显著增加,但尚未普遍实施。在2018年,约88%的这些不足之处体现在工作人员认为疼痛管理仍不理想,需要更多培训。结论:提高集体意识以及制定儿科疼痛国家指南有助于改善葡萄牙儿科急诊科的状况。然而,仍缺乏一项协调全国的计划来促进当地培训并优化知识转化。