Calvillo-Ramirez Alejandro, Chew Lauren, Acevedo-Rodriguez Jessica Edith, Palacios-Navas Andrea G, Vidal-Valderrama Carlos E, Ponsky Lee, Vince Randy
Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina, Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico.
World J Urol. 2025 May 29;43(1):335. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05712-3.
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is an established treatment modality for localized renal masses (LRMs). Nevertheless, its applicability in aging populations presents unique challenges, with limited existing evidence. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of RAPN for LRMs in elderly patients compared to younger individuals.
Databases were searched until August 2024 to identify articles comparing RAPN outcomes in elderly and younger patients. Studies were stratified based on age cutoffs for older individuals. Three primary cutoffs were employed for subgroup analysis: 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years old. Primary outcomes included the incidence of any grade and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and trifecta achievement. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were used for statistical comparisons.
Seven studies comprising 5,937 patients were included. A significantly higher incidence of any grade complications was observed in elderly patients (OR 1.38 [95%confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.84], p = 0.02). However, there was no difference in major complications (OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18], p = 0.28) or trifecta achievement (OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25], p = 0.84) between elderly and younger patients. Similarly, estimated blood loss, transfusion rates, positive surgical margins, and operative time were comparable between groups. Notably, elderly individuals had a shorter warm ischemia time (MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79], p < 0.001).
RAPN appears to be a viable treatment option for well-selected elderly patients with LRMs who are candidates for active treatment. While elderly patients experienced higher rates of minor complications, major complications and trifecta achievement were comparable to those of younger patients.
机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)是治疗局限性肾肿块(LRM)的一种既定治疗方式。然而,其在老年人群中的适用性存在独特挑战,现有证据有限。本荟萃分析旨在评估与年轻个体相比,RAPN治疗老年患者LRM的安全性和可行性。
检索数据库至2024年8月,以确定比较老年和年轻患者RAPN结果的文章。根据老年个体的年龄界限对研究进行分层。亚组分析采用三个主要界限:70 - 74岁、75 - 79岁和≥80岁。主要结局包括任何等级和严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥3级)的发生率以及三连胜的达成情况。采用比值比(OR)和均值差(MD)进行统计学比较。
纳入了7项研究,共5937例患者。老年患者中任何等级并发症的发生率显著更高(OR 1.38 [95%置信区间[CI] 1.03, 1.84],p = 0.02)。然而,老年和年轻患者在严重并发症(OR 1.32 [95%CI 0.79, 2.18],p = 0.28)或三连胜达成情况(OR 1.02 [95%CI 0.83, 1.25],p = 0.84)方面没有差异。同样,两组之间的估计失血量、输血率、手术切缘阳性率和手术时间相当。值得注意的是,老年个体的热缺血时间较短(MD -1.59 [95%CI -2.40, -0.79],p < 0.001)。
对于精心挑选的适合积极治疗的老年LRM患者,RAPN似乎是一种可行的治疗选择。虽然老年患者的轻微并发症发生率较高,但严重并发症和三连胜达成情况与年轻患者相当。