Ovens Christopher A, Cornish Elisa E, Ali Haipha, Leung Vannessa, Sakti Dhimas H, Saakova Nonna, Raza Marium, Nash Benjamin M, Fraser Clare L, McCluskey Peter, Jamieson Robyn V, Grigg John R
Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Eye Genetics Research Unit, Children's Medical Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06851-4.
The electronegative electroretinogram (ERG) is a specific clinical finding usually indicating inner retinal dysfunction occurring post-phototransduction. X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) and complete and incomplete congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB, iCSNB) are inherited retinal dystrophies classically associated with electronegative ERGs. Comparing the full-field ERG b:a ratio expands current ERG diagnostic criteria and aids in localising physiological sites and pathological mechanisms.
A retrospective review of patients with a clinical diagnosis of iCSNB, cCSNB and XLRS was conducted. ERG and genetic results were analysed. Average b:a ratios between groups were compared, and prevalence of electropositivity was assessed using thresholds of b:a > 1.0 and b:a > 1.50.
53 patients were included, and genetic confirmation was available in 7/24 iCSNB, 3/14 cCSNB and 11/15 XLRS patients respectively. In genetically proven cases, mean b:a ratio in XLRS patients (b:a = 1.04) was significantly higher than cCSNB (b:a = 0.60, p < 0.001) and iCSNB (b:a = 0.60, p < 0.001). An electropositive ERG was significantly more likely to be associated with RS1 than iCSNB (p < 0.001) or cCSNB (p = 0.001) at b:a > 1.0 threshold, and more likely RS1 than iCSNB (p = 0.040) at b:a > 1.5 threshold.
Our study highlights the distinct ERG findings between these typically electronegative inner retinal dystrophies. In a clinical setting, the traditional electronegative definition of b:a < 1.0 appears very insensitive to detect XLRS patients. Our data suggests clinical suspicion should remain even in patients with a b:a ratio > 1.50, and highlights the importance of genetic testing in these cases.
阴性视网膜电图(ERG)是一种特定的临床发现,通常表明光转导后发生的视网膜内层功能障碍。X连锁视网膜劈裂症(XLRS)以及完全性和不完全性先天性静止性夜盲(cCSNB、iCSNB)是经典的与阴性ERG相关的遗传性视网膜营养不良。比较全视野ERG的b:a比值可扩展当前的ERG诊断标准,并有助于定位生理部位和病理机制。
对临床诊断为iCSNB、cCSNB和XLRS的患者进行回顾性研究。分析ERG和基因检测结果。比较各组之间的平均b:a比值,并使用b:a>1.0和b:a>1.50的阈值评估阳性ERG的患病率。
共纳入53例患者,分别有7/24例iCSNB、3/14例cCSNB和11/15例XLRS患者获得基因确诊。在基因确诊的病例中,XLRS患者的平均b:a比值(b:a = 1.04)显著高于cCSNB(b:a = 0.60,p<0.001)和iCSNB(b:a = 0.60,p<0.001)。在b:a>1.0的阈值下,阳性ERG与XLRS相关的可能性显著高于iCSNB(p<0.001)或cCSNB(p = 0.001);在b:a>1.5的阈值下,与XLRS相关的可能性高于iCSNB(p = 0.040)。
我们的研究突出了这些典型的阴性视网膜内层营养不良之间不同的ERG表现。在临床环境中,传统的b:a<1.0的阴性定义似乎对检测XLRS患者非常不敏感。我们的数据表明,即使b:a比值>1.50的患者也应保持临床怀疑,并强调了这些病例中基因检测的重要性。