Suppr超能文献

扩张型心肌病患者的静息冠脉血流与长期临床结局

Resting coronary flow and long-term clinical outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy.

作者信息

Portolan Leonardo, Scarsini Roberto, Gallinoro Emanuele, Paolisso Pasquale, Belmonte Marta, Bonvicini Eleonora, Roccabruna Alessandra, Ciceri Luca, Pilan Matteo, Springhetti Paolo, Fabroni Margherita, Andreaggi Stefano, Della Mora Francesco, Piccoli Anna, Setti Martina, Butturini Caterina, Gambaro Alessia, Pesarini Gabriele, Benfari Giovanni, Vanderheyden Marc, Barbato Emanuele, Ribichini Flavio

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Division of Cardiology, Verona University Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03432-8.

Abstract

Compensatory high resting coronary flow (rCF) is a major determinant of low coronary flow reserve in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We sought to assess if angiography-derived rCF was associated with left ventricle reverse remodeling (LVRR) and clinical outcomes in DCM. Angiography-derived rCF was derived based on TIMI frame count and validated using invasive continuous thermodilution absolute flow (n = 48). The association between rCF and clinical outcomes was evaluated in a prospectively enrolled cohort of patients with DCM who underwent coronary angiography to rule out coronary disease (n = 110). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, rehospitalization for heart failure, relevant ventricular arrhythmias, appropriate implanted cardiac defibrillator intervention, and cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation. LVRR was evaluated after at least 12 months of guidelines-directed medical therapy (GDMT). rCF was significantly correlated with thermodilution-derived resting coronary perfusion (rho = 0.411, p = 0.004). High rCF (≥ 2.32) was associated with impaired microvascular resistance reserve (AUC 0.721; 95% CI 0.572 to 0.870, p = 0.004). Among 110 patients of the prognostic cohort, 15 patients (13.6%) met the primary endpoint. rCF was higher in patients without LVRR (2.14 [1.67 to 3.0] vs. 1.87 [1.36 to 2.50], p = 0.036) and in those who met the primary endpoint (3.0 [1.87 to 3.75] vs. 1.87 [1.36 to 2.50], p = 0.004). Patients with rCF ≥ 2.32 had a higher rate of events compared with patients with preserved rCF (27.5% vs. 5.7%, log-rank p = 0.007; aHR 4.143 [95% CI 1.315 to 13.059], p = 0.015). In DCM patients, high rCF was associated with a reduced rate of LVRR after GDMT and adverse clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up.

摘要

代偿性高静息冠状动脉血流(rCF)是扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者冠状动脉血流储备降低的主要决定因素。我们试图评估血管造影得出的rCF是否与DCM患者的左心室逆向重构(LVRR)及临床结局相关。血管造影得出的rCF基于心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)帧数计算得出,并采用有创连续热稀释绝对血流进行验证(n = 48)。在一个前瞻性纳入的行冠状动脉造影以排除冠心病的DCM患者队列(n = 110)中评估rCF与临床结局之间的关联。主要终点为全因死亡、因心力衰竭再次住院、相关室性心律失常、合适的植入式心脏除颤器干预以及心脏移植或左心室辅助装置植入的复合终点。在至少12个月的指南指导药物治疗(GDMT)后评估LVRR。rCF与热稀释得出的静息冠状动脉灌注显著相关(rho = 0.411,p = 0.004)。高rCF(≥2.32)与微血管阻力储备受损相关(曲线下面积0.721;95%置信区间0.572至0.870,p = 0.004)。在预后队列的110例患者中,15例(13.6%)达到主要终点。无LVRR的患者rCF更高(2.14[1.67至3.0] vs. 1.87[从1.36至2.50],p = 0.036),达到主要终点的患者也是如此(3.0[1.87至3.75] vs. 1.87[从1.36至2.50],p = 0.004)。与rCF保留的患者相比,rCF≥2.32的患者事件发生率更高(27.5% vs. 5.7%,对数秩检验p = 0.007;校正风险比4.143[95%置信区间1.315至13.059],p = 0.015)。在DCM患者中,高rCF与GDMT后LVRR率降低及长期随访时不良临床结局相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验