Siedlecki Karen L, Falzarano Francesca, Yazdani Neshat, Minahan Zucchetto Jillian
Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA.
Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Memory. 2025 Jul;33(6):667-676. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2025.2508446. Epub 2025 May 29.
The current study examines the age-related positivity bias and the age-related positivity effect using a one-year longitudinal design with a sample that spans adulthood ( = 374; age range 19-90; = 47.41; = 16.75). Participants answered questions regarding their memories of learning about the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Results provide evidence for the positivity bias (i.e., a main effect of age) but no evidence of the positivity effect (i.e., an age x valence interaction). Increased age was associated with reporting feeling less negative at the time of the event, and also remembering feeling more positive (elated and happy) when reconstructing the event one year later. Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between age and valence variables, indicating that depressive symptoms may partly explain the age-related positivity bias.
本研究采用为期一年的纵向设计,以涵盖成年期的样本(N = 374;年龄范围19 - 90岁;M = 47.41;SD = 16.75),考察了与年龄相关的积极偏差和与年龄相关的积极效应。参与者回答了关于他们对得知2020年美国总统选举结果的记忆的问题。结果为积极偏差(即年龄的主效应)提供了证据,但没有为积极效应(即年龄×效价交互作用)提供证据。年龄增长与报告事件发生时感觉不那么消极相关,并且在一年后重构该事件时记得感觉更积极(兴高采烈和快乐)。抑郁症状部分介导了年龄与效价变量之间的关系,表明抑郁症状可能部分解释了与年龄相关的积极偏差。