Engelen Peter-Jan, Cassimon Danny
Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 28;10(5):e018390. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018390.
Critical voices on unfairly high mpox and other vaccine prices open the debate on the 'right price' to be paid to private vaccine suppliers. We apply compound real options analysis as a more appropriate valuation method to derive a correct firm's break-even price. Real option models are better able to capture the development costs, associated risks and the embedded operational flexibility in vaccine development in a superior way compared with more traditional net present value (NPV) methods. The real option price is lower than standard NPV-based methods, thereby providing a basis to improve the bargaining position of payers in negotiating better vaccine price outcomes. Deeper insights into the correct break-even price will create a more balanced playing field between firms and payers. This can also lead to more equitable access to vaccines in developing countries.
对猴痘及其他疫苗价格过高不合理的批评声音引发了关于向私营疫苗供应商支付“合理价格”的讨论。我们应用复合实物期权分析作为一种更合适的估值方法来得出企业的正确盈亏平衡价格。与更传统的净现值(NPV)方法相比,实物期权模型能够以更优的方式更好地捕捉疫苗研发中的开发成本、相关风险以及内在运营灵活性。实物期权价格低于基于标准净现值的方法,从而为改善付款方在谈判更好的疫苗价格结果时的议价地位提供了依据。对正确盈亏平衡价格的更深入洞察将在企业和付款方之间创造一个更加公平的竞争环境。这也能够使发展中国家更公平地获得疫苗。