Suppr超能文献

胰岛素抵抗介导了美国患有代谢综合征的成年人身体活动与死亡率之间的关联。

Insulin resistance mediates the association between physical activity and mortality in US adults with metabolic syndrome.

作者信息

Gao Kedi, Lin Youliang

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Wuhan University of Technology, South Lake Campus, Xiongchu Avenue 258, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02921-z.

Abstract

This study examines the associations between physical activity (PA) and all-cause mortality (ACM), cause-specific mortality (cancer, cardiovascular disease), and premature mortality, with a focus on the mediating role of insulin resistance. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed, including 8,460 participants. PA was quantified in metabolic equivalents (MET-h/week) and categorized into four groups: no physical activity (NOPA), low-level PA (LLPA), moderate-level PA (MLPA), and high-level PA (HLPA). Cox regression, restricted cubic splines, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves assessed the associations between PA and mortality risks. Mediation analysis evaluated the role of insulin resistance. With a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 1,147 all-cause deaths, 321 cardiovascular deaths, 274 cancer deaths, and 441 premature deaths. Compared to the NOPA group (0 MET-h/week), the LLPA (MET < 10 h/week), MLPA (10 ≤ MET < 50 h/week), and HLPA (≥ 50 MET-h/week) groups showed significant reductions in all-cause mortality risk by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.73), 44% (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.48-0.66), and 57% (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.35-0.52), respectively. Similarly, for cardiovascular disease mortality, the risk reductions were 49% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36-0.71), 51% (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.37-0.64), and 52% (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66) across the three PA groups. In terms of cancer mortality risk, only the HLPA group showed a statistically significant 50% reduction (HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74), while the LLPA and MLPA groups demonstrated non-significant reductions of 29% and 16%, respectively. A nonlinear dose-response relationship was observed for PA and mortality. Mediation analysis revealed that HOMA-IR mediated 22.1% (P = 0.022), 16.7% (P = 0.002), 15.7% (P = 0.030), and 10.1% (P = 0.058) of the association ACM, cause-specific mortality, and premature mortality, respectively. This study highlights the protective effects of PA in reducing the risks of ACM, cause-specific mortality, and premature mortality, particularly in patients with metabolic syndrome. Insulin resistance plays a significant mediating role in these relationships, underscoring the importance of targeting both PA and insulin resistance in interventions to reduce mortality risks in metabolic syndrome patients.

摘要

本研究探讨身体活动(PA)与全因死亡率(ACM)、特定病因死亡率(癌症、心血管疾病)和过早死亡率之间的关联,重点关注胰岛素抵抗的中介作用。对来自国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据进行了分析,包括8460名参与者。PA以代谢当量(MET-h/周)进行量化,并分为四组:无身体活动(NOPA)、低水平PA(LLPA)、中等水平PA(MLPA)和高水平PA(HLPA)。采用Cox回归、受限立方样条和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估PA与死亡风险之间的关联。中介分析评估了胰岛素抵抗的作用。中位随访6.3年,有1147例全因死亡、321例心血管死亡、274例癌症死亡和441例过早死亡。与NOPA组(0 MET-h/周)相比,LLPA组(MET<10 h/周)、MLPA组(10≤MET<50 h/周)和HLPA组(≥50 MET-h/周)的全因死亡风险分别显著降低39%(HR = 0.61,95%CI:0.51 - 0.73)、44%(HR = 0.56,95%CI:0.48 - 0.66)和57%(HR = 0.43,95%CI:0.35 - 0.52)。同样,对于心血管疾病死亡率,三组PA组的风险降低分别为49%(HR = 0.51,95%CI:0.36 - 0.71)、51%(HR = 0.49,95%CI:0.37 - 0.64)和52%(HR = 0.48,95%CI:0.35 - 0.66)。就癌症死亡风险而言,只有HLPA组显示出统计学上显著的50%降低(HR = 0.50,95%CI:0.34 - 0.74),而LLPA组和MLPA组分别显示出29%和16%的非显著降低。观察到PA与死亡率之间存在非线性剂量反应关系。中介分析显示,HOMA-IR分别介导了ACM、特定病因死亡率和过早死亡率关联的22.1%(P = 0.022)、16.7%(P = 0.002)、15.7%(P = 0.030)和10.1%(P = 0.058)。本研究强调了PA在降低ACM、特定病因死亡率和过早死亡率风险方面的保护作用,尤其是在代谢综合征患者中。胰岛素抵抗在这些关系中起显著的中介作用,强调了在干预措施中同时针对PA和胰岛素抵抗以降低代谢综合征患者死亡风险的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb05/12122696/bbd460a255cc/41598_2025_2921_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验