MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Aug;57(15):979-989. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105669. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
To estimate the dose-response associations between non-occupational physical activity and several chronic disease and mortality outcomes in the general adult population.
Systematic review and cohort-level dose-response meta-analysis.
PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and reference lists of published studies.
Prospective cohort studies with (1) general population samples >10 000 adults, (2) ≥3 physical activity categories, and (3) risk measures and CIs for all-cause mortality or incident total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, total cancer and site-specific cancers (head and neck, myeloid leukaemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, oesophagus, prostate, kidney).
196 articles were included, covering 94 cohorts with >30 million participants. The evidence base was largest for all-cause mortality (50 separate results; 163 415 543 person-years, 811 616 events), and incidence of cardiovascular disease (37 results; 28 884 209 person-years, 74 757 events) and cancer (31 results; 35 500 867 person-years, 185 870 events). In general, higher activity levels were associated with lower risk of all outcomes. Differences in risk were greater between 0 and 8.75 marginal metabolic equivalent of task-hours per week (mMET-hours/week) (equivalent to the recommended 150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic physical activity), with smaller marginal differences in risk above this level to 17.5 mMET-hours/week, beyond which additional differences were small and uncertain. Associations were stronger for all-cause (relative risk (RR) at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.69, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.73) and cardiovascular disease (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.71, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77) mortality than for cancer mortality (RR at 8.75 mMET-hours/week: 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.89). If all insufficiently active individuals had achieved 8.75 mMET-hours/week, 15.7% (95% CI 13.1 to 18.2) of all premature deaths would have been averted.
Inverse non-linear dose-response associations suggest substantial protection against a range of chronic disease outcomes from small increases in non-occupational physical activity in inactive adults. CRD42018095481.
评估非职业体力活动与一般成年人群多种慢性疾病和死亡率结局之间的剂量-反应关联。
系统评价和队列水平的剂量-反应荟萃分析。
PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和已发表研究的参考文献列表。
(1)有>10000 名成年人的一般人群样本,(2)≥3 个体力活动类别,以及(3)所有原因死亡率或总心血管疾病、冠心病、中风、心力衰竭、总癌症和特定部位癌症(头颈部、髓性白血病、骨髓瘤、胃贲门、肺、肝、子宫内膜、结肠、乳房、膀胱、直肠、食管、前列腺、肾)的风险测量和 CI 的前瞻性队列研究。
纳入了 196 篇文章,涵盖了 94 个队列,涉及超过 3000 万人。证据基础最大的是所有原因死亡率(50 个独立结果;163415543 人年,811616 例事件)和心血管疾病发病率(37 个结果;28884209 人年,74757 例事件)和癌症发病率(31 个结果;35500867 人年,185870 例事件)。一般来说,较高的活动水平与较低的所有结局风险相关。在 0 至 8.75 边际代谢当量任务小时/周(mMET-hours/week)(相当于推荐的每周 150 分钟/周的中等至剧烈有氧运动)之间的风险差异更大,在这一水平以上至 17.5 mMET-hours/week 的风险边际差异较小,超过这一水平,额外的差异较小且不确定。在所有原因(8.75 mMET-hours/week 时的相对风险(RR):0.69,95%CI 0.65 至 0.73)和心血管疾病(8.75 mMET-hours/week 时的 RR:0.71,95%CI 0.66 至 0.77)死亡率方面,关联强于癌症死亡率(8.75 mMET-hours/week 时的 RR:0.85,95%CI 0.81 至 0.89)。如果所有不活跃的个体都达到了 8.75 mMET-hours/week,那么所有过早死亡的 15.7%(95%CI 13.1%至 18.2%)都可以预防。
非线性反比剂量-反应关联表明,在不活跃的成年人中,非职业体力活动的少量增加对多种慢性疾病结局具有显著的保护作用。CRD42018095481。