Alasaad Hakam, Diri Doried, Halloum Wael, Muhammed Hussain, Ibrahim Jaber
Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Syria.
JB JS Open Access. 2025 May 29;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00007. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
Anterior knee pain (AKP) remains a major complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mobile bearing (MB) is an alternative to fixed bearing (FB), supposing it has theoretical advantages in increasing the range of motion, reducing wear, and reducing anterior knee pain incidence when the patella is not resurfaced.
MATERIALS & METHODS: This research is a double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, conducted between July 2021 and March 2024. It included 76 patients who underwent unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Patients were randomized into 2 groups; the first used a MB, and the second used a FB. Patients were followed for 18 months. The 2 groups were compared based on the incidence and severity of anterior knee pain, knee range of motion, Knee Society Score, and patient satisfaction assessment according to the Forgotten Joint Scale (FJS-12).
AKP occurred in 5 patients in the MB group and 6 in the FB group. We did not find a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.744). However, the severity of anterior knee pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the MB group was statistically significantly lower compared with the FB group (p < 0.05). We did not observe any statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in clinical and functional outcomes, or the complications rate.
Using a MB does not reduce the incidence of anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. However, it could contribute to reducing the severity of this pain if it occurs for other reasons. Therefore, we recommend conducting further studies to determine the causes of anterior knee pain.
Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
膝关节前侧疼痛(AKP)仍然是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的主要并发症。活动平台(MB)是固定平台(FB)的一种替代方案,假设在不进行髌骨表面置换时,它在增加活动范围、减少磨损以及降低膝关节前侧疼痛发生率方面具有理论优势。
本研究是一项双盲、随机对照临床试验,于2021年7月至2024年3月进行。纳入76例行单侧初次全膝关节置换术且未进行髌骨表面置换的患者。患者被随机分为两组;第一组使用活动平台,第二组使用固定平台。对患者进行18个月的随访。根据膝关节前侧疼痛的发生率和严重程度、膝关节活动范围、膝关节协会评分以及根据遗忘关节量表(FJS - 12)进行的患者满意度评估对两组进行比较。
活动平台组有5例患者发生AKP,固定平台组有6例。我们未发现两组之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.)。然而,活动平台组根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的膝关节前侧疼痛严重程度与固定平台组相比在统计学上显著更低(p < 0.05)。我们未观察到两组在临床和功能结局或并发症发生率方面存在任何统计学显著差异。
在未进行髌骨表面置换的初次全膝关节置换术后,使用活动平台并不能降低膝关节前侧疼痛的发生率。然而,如果因其他原因发生这种疼痛,它可能有助于减轻疼痛的严重程度。因此,我们建议进行进一步研究以确定膝关节前侧疼痛的原因。
治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。