Patel Rounak, Pawar Satyajeet, Wagh Kailash, Abdullah Md, Guddeti Prashanth K, Verma Bhawani S, Mundhe Smita S, Shevale Vaishnavi B
Department of Microbiology, Dr. Ulhas Patil Medical College and Hospital, Jalgaon Khurd, IND.
Department of Microbiology, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed To Be University), Karad, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 28;17(4):e83155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83155. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Background Bacterial infections in sterile body fluids represent a significant clinical concern, particularly when caused by resistant pathogens. β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria, including extended-spectrum-lactamase (ESBL), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), and AmpC β-lactamase producers, complicate treatment strategies, leading to poor patient outcomes. Infections in vulnerable patients, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs), are more susceptible to these resistant organisms, highlighting the need for urgent surveillance and effective antimicrobial strategies. Objectives The primary goal of this study was to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from sterile body fluids, with a focus on β-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria. The study further aimed to highlight the implications of antimicrobial resistance patterns in guiding effective empirical therapy and infection control strategies. Methodology A total of 180 sterile body fluid samples, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, bile, peritoneal or ascitic fluid, and synovial fluid, were collected and processed for bacterial isolation. Standard microbiological procedures, including Gram staining, culture on appropriate media, and biochemical identification tests, were utilized to identify the isolates, followed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test to determine resistance profiles, with particular attention to ESBL, MBL, and AmpC β-lactamase production. Results Of the 180 samples, 27 (15%) showed bacterial growth, with and being the most frequently isolated pathogens. Testing for antimicrobial susceptibility showed notable resistance levels to commonly used antibiotics, including cefoperazone-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam. ESBL production was found in 40.74% of the gram-negative isolates, and MBL production was present in 48.15%. The study recorded maximum resistance rates in CSF samples, indicating the critical need for rapid and accurate diagnostic methods. The resistance profiles of isolated pathogens revealed limited options for empirical treatment, underscoring the need for targeted antimicrobial stewardship strategies. Conclusion The study underscores the growing concern of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in sterile body fluid infections, particularly in vulnerable patient populations. The detection of ESBL, MBL, and AmpC-producing organisms highlights the urgency for enhanced surveillance, rapid diagnostics, and strict antimicrobial stewardship to mitigate the impact of these resistant pathogens.
背景 无菌体液中的细菌感染是一个重大的临床问题,尤其是由耐药病原体引起时。产β-内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性菌,包括产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)、金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的细菌,使治疗策略变得复杂,导致患者预后不良。脆弱患者,尤其是重症监护病房(ICU)中的患者,更容易感染这些耐药菌,这凸显了进行紧急监测和采取有效抗菌策略的必要性。目的 本研究的主要目标是评估无菌体液中细菌分离株的流行情况和抗菌耐药模式,重点关注产β-内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性菌。该研究还旨在强调抗菌耐药模式在指导有效经验性治疗和感染控制策略方面的意义。方法 共收集了180份无菌体液样本,包括脑脊液(CSF)、胸水、心包积液、胆汁、腹水或腹腔积液以及滑液,并对其进行细菌分离处理。采用标准微生物学程序,包括革兰氏染色、在合适培养基上培养以及生化鉴定试验来鉴定分离株,随后使用 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法进行抗菌药敏试验(AST)以确定耐药谱,特别关注ESBL、MBL和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的产生情况。结果 在180份样本中,27份(15%)显示有细菌生长,[此处原文缺失两种最常分离出的病原体名称]为最常分离出的病原体。抗菌药敏试验显示对常用抗生素,包括头孢哌酮 - 舒巴坦和哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦,有显著的耐药水平。在40.74%的革兰氏阴性分离株中发现产ESBL情况,48.15%存在产MBL情况。该研究记录到脑脊液样本中的耐药率最高,这表明迫切需要快速准确的诊断方法。分离病原体的耐药谱显示经验性治疗的选择有限,强调了采取针对性抗菌管理策略的必要性。结论 该研究强调了在无菌体液感染中,尤其是在脆弱患者群体中,多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌日益引起关注。检测出产ESBL、MBL和AmpC的细菌凸显了加强监测、快速诊断和严格抗菌管理以减轻这些耐药病原体影响的紧迫性。