• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的烧伤手术术中失血量预测模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting intraoperative blood loss during burn surgery.

作者信息

Zuo Fangqing, Su Jiaqing, Li Yang, Xin Haiming, Li Chunhao, Huang Lina, Zhang Lijuan, Li Junda, Zeng Zhuo, Chen Yu, Gong Yali, Chen Jing, Lan Yingying, Chen Yajie, Zhang Cheng, Peng Yizhi, Luo Gaoxing, Yuan Zhiqiang

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, PLA 77th Group Army Hospital, Leshan, China.

出版信息

Surgery. 2025 Aug;184:109445. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109445. Epub 2025 May 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109445
PMID:40446607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood loss is a critical issue in the care of patients with burns. The timely identification of patients at elevated risk for substantial blood loss during surgical procedures is imperative.

METHODS

Demographic data, laboratory test results, and surgical factors of patients were collected. For predicting intraoperative blood loss >750 mL, the original cohort was randomly divided in an 8:2 ratio, with the larger group allocated for the model development and the smaller for internal validation. Six machine-learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting were used to develop the prediction models. The performance of the models was assessed by 8 metrics as well as density curve, calibration curve and decision curve. A scoring system was designed to assess the performance efficacy. Validation was conducted in another 2 cohorts. The optimal prediction model acquired. Ultimately, a web-based calculator to estimate the incidence of intraoperative blood loss >750 mL was created.

RESULTS

A total of 395 burn surgeries from 2 hospitals were analyzed, with 245 surgeries for modeling, 89 surgeries for the internal-external validation, and 61 surgeries for the external validation. The model features consist of 8 clinical variables. The random forest model gained the greatest total metrics score of 36, followed by the support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, and decision tree models with total scores of 33, 32, 28, 24, and 18, respectively. Specifically, the random forest model performed superior in most metrics compared to the other models, achieving greater accuracy (0.776), recall (0.930), F1 score (0.868), as well as the lowest log loss (0.423), and Brier score (0.142). Meanwhile, the random forest model demonstrated strong performance with an area under the curve of 0.784 (95% confidence interval, 0.779-0.789), ranking second only slightly behind the extreme gradient boosting model, which achieved the greatest area under the curve of 0.785 (95% confidence interval, 0.780-0.790). Other models showed comparatively lower area under the curve values. The density curve, calibration plot, histogram with mean predicted probabilities against counts and decision curve of the random forest model also performed well. In the internal-external validation cohort, the random forest reached the greatest total metrics score of 35. In the external validation cohort, the random forest again secured the greatest composite metrics score, amounting to 38. Overall, the random forest model was found to be the optimal model for predictive accuracy. In addition initial hemoglobin, time to start surgery after burn injury, initial platelets, % total body surface area excised and grafted, and duration of surgery were the first 5 features to predict intraoperative blood loss. Subsequently, the random forest model, along with the other 5 models, has been deployed online for broader accessibility. https://surgerybloodlosswebapp-m2jzz6hs87qu74vcfrhgz9.streamlit.app/.

CONCLUSION

The random forest model is a valuable artificial intelligence instrument for predicting the incidence of intraoperative blood loss >750 mL during burn surgery. Several principal predictors should receive attention. The 6 machine-learning algorithms have been used to develop a web-based app. This platform will facilitate subsequent data validation and system optimization.

摘要

背景

术中失血是烧伤患者护理中的一个关键问题。在外科手术过程中及时识别有大量失血风险升高的患者至关重要。

方法

收集患者的人口统计学数据、实验室检查结果和手术因素。为预测术中失血>750 mL,将原始队列按8:2的比例随机划分,较大的组用于模型开发,较小的组用于内部验证。使用六种机器学习算法,包括逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、K近邻、支持向量机和极端梯度提升来开发预测模型。通过8个指标以及密度曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线评估模型的性能。设计了一个评分系统来评估性能功效。在另外2个队列中进行验证。获得了最佳预测模型。最终,创建了一个基于网络的计算器来估计术中失血>750 mL的发生率。

结果

分析了来自2家医院的395例烧伤手术,其中245例手术用于建模,89例手术用于内部-外部验证,61例手术用于外部验证。模型特征由8个临床变量组成。随机森林模型获得了最高的总指标得分36分,其次是支持向量机、极端梯度提升、K近邻、逻辑回归和决策树模型,总分分别为33分、32分、28分、24分和18分。具体而言,与其他模型相比,随机森林模型在大多数指标上表现更优,实现了更高的准确率(0.776)、召回率(0.930)、F1分数(0.868)以及最低的对数损失(0.423)和布里尔分数(0.142)。同时,随机森林模型表现出强大性能,曲线下面积为0.784(95%置信区间,0.779 - 0.789),仅次于极端梯度提升模型,后者曲线下面积最大,为0.785(95%置信区间,0.780 - 0.790)。其他模型的曲线下面积值相对较低。随机森林模型的密度曲线、校准图、平均预测概率与计数的直方图以及决策曲线也表现良好。在内部-外部验证队列中,随机森林达到了最高的总指标得分35分。在外部验证队列中,随机森林再次获得了最高的综合指标得分,总计38分。总体而言,随机森林模型被发现是预测准确性的最佳模型。此外,初始血红蛋白、烧伤后开始手术的时间、初始血小板、切除并移植的体表面积百分比以及手术持续时间是预测术中失血的前5个特征。随后,随机森林模型以及其他5个模型已在线部署,以实现更广泛的可及性。https://surgerybloodlosswebapp-m2jzz6hs87qu74vcfrhgz9.streamlit.app/。

结论

随机森林模型是预测烧伤手术中术中失血>750 mL发生率的一种有价值的人工智能工具。几个主要预测因素应予以关注。六种机器学习算法已用于开发基于网络的应用程序。该平台将便于后续的数据验证和系统优化。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting intraoperative blood loss during burn surgery.基于机器学习的烧伤手术术中失血量预测模型的开发与验证
Surgery. 2025 Aug;184:109445. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109445. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
An artificial intelligence model to predict mortality among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective validated cohort study.一种预测血液透析患者死亡率的人工智能模型:一项回顾性验证队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06576-8.
4
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
6
Artificial Intelligence-Based prediction model for surgical site infection in metastatic spinal disease: a multicenter development and validation study.基于人工智能的转移性脊柱疾病手术部位感染预测模型:一项多中心开发与验证研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002806.
7
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
8
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
10
Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.在预测翻修关节成形术方面,机器学习的表现并未优于传统的竞争风险模型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1472-1482. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003018. Epub 2024 Mar 12.