Suppr超能文献

基于机器学习的烧伤手术术中失血量预测模型的开发与验证

Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting intraoperative blood loss during burn surgery.

作者信息

Zuo Fangqing, Su Jiaqing, Li Yang, Xin Haiming, Li Chunhao, Huang Lina, Zhang Lijuan, Li Junda, Zeng Zhuo, Chen Yu, Gong Yali, Chen Jing, Lan Yingying, Chen Yajie, Zhang Cheng, Peng Yizhi, Luo Gaoxing, Yuan Zhiqiang

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, PLA 77th Group Army Hospital, Leshan, China.

出版信息

Surgery. 2025 Aug;184:109445. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109445. Epub 2025 May 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood loss is a critical issue in the care of patients with burns. The timely identification of patients at elevated risk for substantial blood loss during surgical procedures is imperative.

METHODS

Demographic data, laboratory test results, and surgical factors of patients were collected. For predicting intraoperative blood loss >750 mL, the original cohort was randomly divided in an 8:2 ratio, with the larger group allocated for the model development and the smaller for internal validation. Six machine-learning algorithms, including logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting were used to develop the prediction models. The performance of the models was assessed by 8 metrics as well as density curve, calibration curve and decision curve. A scoring system was designed to assess the performance efficacy. Validation was conducted in another 2 cohorts. The optimal prediction model acquired. Ultimately, a web-based calculator to estimate the incidence of intraoperative blood loss >750 mL was created.

RESULTS

A total of 395 burn surgeries from 2 hospitals were analyzed, with 245 surgeries for modeling, 89 surgeries for the internal-external validation, and 61 surgeries for the external validation. The model features consist of 8 clinical variables. The random forest model gained the greatest total metrics score of 36, followed by the support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, K-nearest neighbor, logistic regression, and decision tree models with total scores of 33, 32, 28, 24, and 18, respectively. Specifically, the random forest model performed superior in most metrics compared to the other models, achieving greater accuracy (0.776), recall (0.930), F1 score (0.868), as well as the lowest log loss (0.423), and Brier score (0.142). Meanwhile, the random forest model demonstrated strong performance with an area under the curve of 0.784 (95% confidence interval, 0.779-0.789), ranking second only slightly behind the extreme gradient boosting model, which achieved the greatest area under the curve of 0.785 (95% confidence interval, 0.780-0.790). Other models showed comparatively lower area under the curve values. The density curve, calibration plot, histogram with mean predicted probabilities against counts and decision curve of the random forest model also performed well. In the internal-external validation cohort, the random forest reached the greatest total metrics score of 35. In the external validation cohort, the random forest again secured the greatest composite metrics score, amounting to 38. Overall, the random forest model was found to be the optimal model for predictive accuracy. In addition initial hemoglobin, time to start surgery after burn injury, initial platelets, % total body surface area excised and grafted, and duration of surgery were the first 5 features to predict intraoperative blood loss. Subsequently, the random forest model, along with the other 5 models, has been deployed online for broader accessibility. https://surgerybloodlosswebapp-m2jzz6hs87qu74vcfrhgz9.streamlit.app/.

CONCLUSION

The random forest model is a valuable artificial intelligence instrument for predicting the incidence of intraoperative blood loss >750 mL during burn surgery. Several principal predictors should receive attention. The 6 machine-learning algorithms have been used to develop a web-based app. This platform will facilitate subsequent data validation and system optimization.

摘要

背景

术中失血是烧伤患者护理中的一个关键问题。在外科手术过程中及时识别有大量失血风险升高的患者至关重要。

方法

收集患者的人口统计学数据、实验室检查结果和手术因素。为预测术中失血>750 mL,将原始队列按8:2的比例随机划分,较大的组用于模型开发,较小的组用于内部验证。使用六种机器学习算法,包括逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林、K近邻、支持向量机和极端梯度提升来开发预测模型。通过8个指标以及密度曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线评估模型的性能。设计了一个评分系统来评估性能功效。在另外2个队列中进行验证。获得了最佳预测模型。最终,创建了一个基于网络的计算器来估计术中失血>750 mL的发生率。

结果

分析了来自2家医院的395例烧伤手术,其中245例手术用于建模,89例手术用于内部-外部验证,61例手术用于外部验证。模型特征由8个临床变量组成。随机森林模型获得了最高的总指标得分36分,其次是支持向量机、极端梯度提升、K近邻、逻辑回归和决策树模型,总分分别为33分、32分、28分、24分和18分。具体而言,与其他模型相比,随机森林模型在大多数指标上表现更优,实现了更高的准确率(0.776)、召回率(0.930)、F1分数(0.868)以及最低的对数损失(0.423)和布里尔分数(0.142)。同时,随机森林模型表现出强大性能,曲线下面积为0.784(95%置信区间,0.779 - 0.789),仅次于极端梯度提升模型,后者曲线下面积最大,为0.785(95%置信区间,0.780 - 0.790)。其他模型的曲线下面积值相对较低。随机森林模型的密度曲线、校准图、平均预测概率与计数的直方图以及决策曲线也表现良好。在内部-外部验证队列中,随机森林达到了最高的总指标得分35分。在外部验证队列中,随机森林再次获得了最高的综合指标得分,总计38分。总体而言,随机森林模型被发现是预测准确性的最佳模型。此外,初始血红蛋白、烧伤后开始手术的时间、初始血小板、切除并移植的体表面积百分比以及手术持续时间是预测术中失血的前5个特征。随后,随机森林模型以及其他5个模型已在线部署,以实现更广泛的可及性。https://surgerybloodlosswebapp-m2jzz6hs87qu74vcfrhgz9.streamlit.app/。

结论

随机森林模型是预测烧伤手术中术中失血>750 mL发生率的一种有价值的人工智能工具。几个主要预测因素应予以关注。六种机器学习算法已用于开发基于网络的应用程序。该平台将便于后续的数据验证和系统优化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验