Abart Theodor, Grujic Marko, Aigner Philipp, Röhrich Michael, Jakubek Stefan, Zimpfer Daniel, Granegger Marcus
Christian Doppler Laboratory for Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):18971. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03743-9.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), such as the HeartMate 3 (HM3), are a treatment option for advanced heart failure (HF). Non-invasive monitoring of heart-pump interaction is crucial but relies on estimated parameters only. Despite the widespread clinical utilization of HM3 estimated flow rate (Q) and pulsatility index (PI) their accuracy was not yet quantified. This study assessed the HM3 monitoring by describing underlying physical characteristics, estimation algorithms and deriving accuracy of estimates in clinical practice. Identification measurements were performed to quantify the physical characteristics and mechanisms of flow estimation. Virtual patients coupled to a hybrid hock circulatory loop were employed to evaluate estimator accuracies in realistic operating conditions. The correlation between Q and torque-generating-current was strong (r² > 0.99, p < 0.001), confirming that estimation is based on speed, current, and viscosity. Also, the PI is directly derived from current. However, the underlying current/flow relationship is ambiguous (one current value corresponds to two flow rates). The HM3 flow estimator showed an RMSE of 1.63 L/min and a correlation coefficient of r = 0.86 (p < 0.001). The non-linear relationship obscures the systolic portion of flow as current declines during peak systole at higher flow rates. HM3 monitoring is unable to accurately represent the actual hemodynamics, particularly in the transition between full support and partial support, which is a region highly prevalent and crucial in clinical practice. It is therefore recommended to interpret values and trends of the HM3 monitoring system with caution.
左心室辅助装置(LVADs),如HeartMate 3(HM3),是晚期心力衰竭(HF)的一种治疗选择。对心脏泵相互作用的无创监测至关重要,但仅依赖于估计参数。尽管HM3估计流量(Q)和搏动指数(PI)在临床中广泛应用,但其准确性尚未得到量化。本研究通过描述潜在的物理特征、估计算法并推导临床实践中估计值的准确性来评估HM3监测。进行识别测量以量化流量估计的物理特征和机制。使用与混合体外循环回路耦合的虚拟患者来评估实际操作条件下估计器的准确性。Q与扭矩产生电流之间的相关性很强(r²>0.99,p<0.001),证实估计是基于速度、电流和粘度。此外,PI直接从电流得出。然而,潜在的电流/流量关系不明确(一个电流值对应两个流量)。HM3流量估计器的均方根误差为1.63 L/min,相关系数为r = 0.86(p<0.001)。在较高流量时,随着收缩期峰值时电流下降,非线性关系掩盖了流量的收缩期部分。HM3监测无法准确反映实际血流动力学,特别是在全支持和部分支持之间的过渡阶段,这在临床实践中是一个高度普遍且关键的区域。因此,建议谨慎解释HM3监测系统的值和趋势。