Lassen Emilie, Lemmen Josephine G, Pennings Guido, Skytte Anne-Bine
Cryos International Sperm & Egg Bank, Vesterbro Torv 3, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Universiteit Gent, Blandijnberg 2, Ghent, B‑9000, Belgium.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 May 30;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01418-8.
Research on egg donors' perspectives regarding identifiability, donor-conceived offspring, and genetic testing remains limited, as most studies have focused on sperm donors. With the growing demand for donor eggs, understanding egg donors' attitudes is essential for ensuring ethical and effective donor programs. This study aims to address this gap by examining egg donors' views on identity-release and non-identity-release donation, the level of information they wish to receive about donor-conceived offspring, and their perspectives on genetic testing and expanded carrier screening.
An online questionnaire was sent to current and past oocyte donors at Cryos International in the United State between July 14th and September 1st, 2023. A total of 39 donors completed the questionnaire (27 ID-release donors and 12 non-ID-release donors).
The most frequent motivation for most egg donors was a desire to help childless couples, often in combination with financial compensation. There was no significant difference between non-ID release donors and ID-release donors in their motivation to help childless people (91.7% versus 85.2%). ID-release donors represented 69.2% of the participants. There were no significant differences between ID-release and non-ID-release donors regarding their attitudes toward receiving information about their donor-conceived offspring or openness about their donor status to others. Both donor groups expressed strong support for genetic testing and extended carrier screening. There was a significant difference regarding contact with donor-conceived children in line with their choice of anonymity type. Non-ID release donors would not enjoy contact with their donor offspring if they were traced and they hoped they would not be traced.
Offering donors the choice between ID-release and non-ID-release donation facilitates broader donor recruitment. The demographic and motivational characteristics of the donors were similar, and both groups demonstrated positive attitudes toward genetic testing and extended carrier screening. Further research is needed to explore the long-term attitudes and experiences of egg donors regarding donation outcomes.
关于卵子捐赠者对可识别性、捐赠受孕后代以及基因检测的看法的研究仍然有限,因为大多数研究都集中在精子捐赠者身上。随着对捐赠卵子需求的不断增加,了解卵子捐赠者的态度对于确保道德且有效的捐赠项目至关重要。本研究旨在通过考察卵子捐赠者对身份公开和身份不公开捐赠的看法、他们希望获得的关于捐赠受孕后代的信息水平,以及他们对基因检测和扩展携带者筛查的观点来填补这一空白。
2023年7月14日至9月1日期间,向美国Cryos International的现任和过往卵母细胞捐赠者发送了一份在线问卷。共有39名捐赠者完成了问卷(27名身份公开捐赠者和12名身份不公开捐赠者)。
大多数卵子捐赠者最常见的动机是希望帮助无子女夫妇,通常还伴有经济补偿。身份不公开捐赠者和身份公开捐赠者在帮助无子女者的动机方面没有显著差异(分别为91.7%和85.2%)。身份公开捐赠者占参与者的69.2%。在对接收关于其捐赠受孕后代的信息的态度或向他人公开其捐赠者身份方面,身份公开和身份不公开捐赠者之间没有显著差异。两个捐赠者群体都对基因检测和扩展携带者筛查表示强烈支持。根据他们对匿名类型的选择,在与捐赠受孕孩子的接触方面存在显著差异。身份不公开捐赠者如果被追踪到,不会愿意与他们的捐赠后代接触,并且希望不会被追踪到。
为捐赠者提供身份公开和身份不公开捐赠之间的选择有助于扩大捐赠者招募范围。捐赠者的人口统计学和动机特征相似,并且两个群体对基因检测和扩展携带者筛查都表现出积极态度。需要进一步研究来探索卵子捐赠者对捐赠结果的长期态度和经历。