Woodruff Ashley E, Haight Olivia, Maj Michelle, Mills Kevin, Chilbert Maya R
Buffalo General Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2025 May 31:10600280251336751. doi: 10.1177/10600280251336751.
Heart failure (HF) places a significant burden on the health care system, driven primarily by HF hospitalizations. While HF guidelines recommend initiation of quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in-hospital initiation of quadruple therapy remains a clinical challenge, particularly in patients with additional high-risk comorbidities.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of triple GDMT with a sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitor (SGLTi) vs mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) added to beta blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi).
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in hospitalized patients with acute HFrEF. Patients who received triple GDMT therapy with a SGLTi or MRA added to beta blocker and ACEi/ARB/ARNi therapy at discharge were compared. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission for HF with secondary outcomes of 30-day readmission for HF and 90-day readmission for GDMT-associated adverse events.
A total of 210 patients were included (SGLTi group, n = 105; MRA group, n = 105). Rates of 90-day readmission for HF between SGLTi and MRA groups were 23 (21.90%) vs 15 (14.29%); = 0.1516. After adjusting for co-variables associated with 90-day readmission, 90-day readmission for HF was not significantly different in patients in the SGLTi vs MRA group (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.742, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.833 to 3.434; = 0.1092). Rates of 90-day readmission for GDMT-associated adverse events were similar between groups.
In this cohort of patients receiving triple GDMT at discharge after hospitalization for acute HFrEF, triple therapy with an SGLTi vs MRA resulted in similar rates of 90-day HF hospitalization.
心力衰竭(HF)给医疗保健系统带来了沉重负担,主要由HF住院治疗所致。虽然HF指南建议对射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者启动四重指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT),但在医院内启动四重治疗仍然是一项临床挑战,尤其是对于伴有其他高危合并症的患者。
本研究的目的是比较在β受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)/血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNi)基础上加用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白抑制剂(SGLTi)与盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的三联GDMT的疗效和安全性。
本回顾性队列研究在急性HFrEF住院患者中进行。比较出院时在β受体阻滞剂和ACEi/ARB/ARNi治疗基础上加用SGLTi或MRA进行三联GDMT治疗的患者。主要结局是HF 90天再入院,次要结局是HF 30天再入院和GDMT相关不良事件90天再入院。
共纳入210例患者(SGLTi组,n = 105;MRA组,n = )。SGLTi组和MRA组HF 90天再入院率分别为23例(21.90%)和15例();P = 0.1516。在对与90天再入院相关的协变量进行调整后,SGLTi组与MRA组患者HF 90天再入院率无显著差异(调整后的风险比 = 1.742,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.833至3.434;P = 0.1092)。两组间GDMT相关不良事件90天再入院率相似。
在这组急性HFrEF住院后出院时接受三联GDMT治疗的患者中,SGLTi与MRA三联治疗导致的HF 90天住院率相似。