Thomson Hamish, Uthayakumar Tharenya, Mandal Anirban
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jul;106:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 May 20.
The optimal method of perineal reconstruction following extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a debated topic among plastic surgeons, with current options including direct closure, biological mesh, flaps or a combination. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the available medical literature on the optimal modality of perineal reconstruction. We hypothesised that the use of flaps is the superior method, with complex cases requiring the use of an additional flap or incorporation of a supporting biological mesh. The specific outcomes of each reconstruction modality assessed included the a) length of hospital stay, b) perineal complications, c) hernias, d) recurrence, e) mortality and f) functional outcomes. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases yielded 1081 articles. Following independent screening using a PICOT framework-guided inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a subsequent quality assessment, 21 papers were incorporated into the review for qualitative analysis; Among the 21 papers, 15 were retrospective cohort studies, 4 were prospective cohort studies, 1 was an observational cohort study and 1 was a randomised control trial. The literature suggests that when used exclusively, flaps and biological meshes achieved a higher percentage of fully healed perineum without complications compared to flap-mesh or flap-flap hybrids. However, these findings are inconclusive and undermined by several critical limitations. Further long-term randomised control trials are required to determine the superior method for perineal reconstruction.
经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)后会阴重建的最佳方法是整形外科医生中存在争议的话题,目前的选择包括直接缝合、生物补片、皮瓣或联合使用。本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行,以评估关于会阴重建最佳方式的现有医学文献。我们假设使用皮瓣是更优的方法,复杂病例需要使用额外的皮瓣或联合使用支持性生物补片。评估的每种重建方式的具体结果包括:a)住院时间,b)会阴并发症,c)疝,d)复发,e)死亡率,f)功能结果。对MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行全面检索,共获得1081篇文章。在使用PICOT框架指导的纳入和排除标准进行独立筛选以及随后的质量评估后,21篇论文被纳入综述进行定性分析;在这21篇论文中,15篇为回顾性队列研究,4篇为前瞻性队列研究,1篇为观察性队列研究,1篇为随机对照试验。文献表明,与皮瓣-补片或皮瓣-皮瓣联合使用相比,单独使用皮瓣和生物补片时,会阴完全愈合且无并发症的比例更高。然而这些结果并不确定,且受到一些关键局限性的影响。需要进一步进行长期随机对照试验来确定会阴重建的更优方法。