• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术与会阴重建的优化技术:一项系统评价

Optimal technique of perineal reconstruction following extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A systematic review.

作者信息

Thomson Hamish, Uthayakumar Tharenya, Mandal Anirban

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jul;106:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.025
PMID:40449320
Abstract

The optimal method of perineal reconstruction following extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) is a debated topic among plastic surgeons, with current options including direct closure, biological mesh, flaps or a combination. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the available medical literature on the optimal modality of perineal reconstruction. We hypothesised that the use of flaps is the superior method, with complex cases requiring the use of an additional flap or incorporation of a supporting biological mesh. The specific outcomes of each reconstruction modality assessed included the a) length of hospital stay, b) perineal complications, c) hernias, d) recurrence, e) mortality and f) functional outcomes. A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases yielded 1081 articles. Following independent screening using a PICOT framework-guided inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a subsequent quality assessment, 21 papers were incorporated into the review for qualitative analysis; Among the 21 papers, 15 were retrospective cohort studies, 4 were prospective cohort studies, 1 was an observational cohort study and 1 was a randomised control trial. The literature suggests that when used exclusively, flaps and biological meshes achieved a higher percentage of fully healed perineum without complications compared to flap-mesh or flap-flap hybrids. However, these findings are inconclusive and undermined by several critical limitations. Further long-term randomised control trials are required to determine the superior method for perineal reconstruction.

摘要

经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)后会阴重建的最佳方法是整形外科医生中存在争议的话题,目前的选择包括直接缝合、生物补片、皮瓣或联合使用。本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行,以评估关于会阴重建最佳方式的现有医学文献。我们假设使用皮瓣是更优的方法,复杂病例需要使用额外的皮瓣或联合使用支持性生物补片。评估的每种重建方式的具体结果包括:a)住院时间,b)会阴并发症,c)疝,d)复发,e)死亡率,f)功能结果。对MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行全面检索,共获得1081篇文章。在使用PICOT框架指导的纳入和排除标准进行独立筛选以及随后的质量评估后,21篇论文被纳入综述进行定性分析;在这21篇论文中,15篇为回顾性队列研究,4篇为前瞻性队列研究,1篇为观察性队列研究,1篇为随机对照试验。文献表明,与皮瓣-补片或皮瓣-皮瓣联合使用相比,单独使用皮瓣和生物补片时,会阴完全愈合且无并发症的比例更高。然而这些结果并不确定,且受到一些关键局限性的影响。需要进一步进行长期随机对照试验来确定会阴重建的更优方法。

相似文献

1
Optimal technique of perineal reconstruction following extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A systematic review.经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术与会阴重建的优化技术:一项系统评价
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Jul;106:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2025.05.025. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review.经括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌后会阴部重建:系统评价。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1052-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03169.x.
3
Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision or extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review of the literature.经腹会阴切除术后或经括约肌外腹会阴切除术后会阴疝修补术:文献系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2017 May;21(5):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1634-8. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Comparison of perineal morbidity between biologic mesh reconstruction and primary closure following extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经括约肌间切除术(extralevator abdominoperineal excision)后,生物补片重建与一期缝合治疗会阴部并发症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;36(5):893-902. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03820-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
5
Optimal approaches to flap reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: A systematic review.腹会阴联合切除术后皮瓣重建的最佳方法:一项系统评价。
Surgeon. 2025 Jun;23(3):155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2025.01.010. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
6
A comparison of surgical techniques for perineal wound closure following perineal excision: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经会阴切除术后会阴伤口缝合的手术技术比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Dec;27(12):1351-1366. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02868-1. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Perineal reconstruction after extra-levator abdominoperineal excision (eLAPE): a systematic review.经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术(eLAPE)后会阴部重建:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1459-68. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1660-6. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
8
Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肿瘤切除术后会阴缺损的一期缝合与皮瓣修复:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 May;137(5):1602-1613. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002107.
9
"Impact of Limberg Flap Reconstruction Following Abdominoperineal Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.".腹会阴联合切除术后Limberg皮瓣重建的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jul 24;56(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01289-7.
10
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.