• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于管理上市人工智能/机器学习医疗设备的总体框架。

A general framework for governing marketed AI/ML medical devices.

作者信息

Babic Boris, Glenn Cohen I, Stern Ariel Dora, Li Yiwen, Ouellet Melissa

机构信息

University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.

University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 31;8(1):328. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01717-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01717-9
PMID:40450160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12126487/
Abstract

This project represents the first systematic assessment of the US Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance of legally marketed artificial intelligence and machine learning based medical devices. We focus on the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database-the FDA's central tool for tracking the safety of marketed AI/ML devices. In particular, we evaluate the data pertaining to adverse events associated with approximately 950 medical devices incorporating AI/ML functions for devices approved between 2010 through 2023, and we find that the existing system is insufficient for properly assessing the safety and effectiveness of AI/ML devices. In particular, we make three contributions: (1) characterize the adverse event reports for such devices, (2) examine the ways in which the existing FDA adverse reporting system for medical devices falls short, and (3) suggest changes FDA might consider in its approach to adverse event reporting for devices incorporating AI/ML functions.

摘要

该项目是对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对合法上市的基于人工智能和机器学习的医疗设备进行上市后监管的首次系统性评估。我们重点关注制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库——FDA追踪上市人工智能/机器学习设备安全性的核心工具。具体而言,我们评估了与2010年至2023年期间批准的约950种包含人工智能/机器学习功能的医疗设备相关的不良事件数据,发现现有系统不足以正确评估人工智能/机器学习设备的安全性和有效性。特别是,我们做出了三项贡献:(1)描述此类设备的不良事件报告特征,(2)研究FDA现有的医疗器械不良报告系统存在不足的方面,(3)建议FDA在处理包含人工智能/机器学习功能的设备的不良事件报告时可能考虑的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff8/12126487/bbb5a097f6ab/41746_2025_1717_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff8/12126487/98c75c27fc72/41746_2025_1717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff8/12126487/bbb5a097f6ab/41746_2025_1717_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff8/12126487/98c75c27fc72/41746_2025_1717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cff8/12126487/bbb5a097f6ab/41746_2025_1717_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A general framework for governing marketed AI/ML medical devices.用于管理上市人工智能/机器学习医疗设备的总体框架。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 31;8(1):328. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01717-9.
2
Late adverse event reporting from medical device manufacturers to the US Food and Drug Administration: cross sectional study.医疗设备制造商向美国食品药品监督管理局报告的晚期不良事件:横断面研究
BMJ. 2025 Mar 12;388:e081518. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081518.
3
4
Narrative Review: The FDA's Perfunctory Approach of Dietary Supplement Regulations Giving Rise to Copious Reports of Adverse Events.叙述性综述:美国食品药品监督管理局对膳食补充剂监管的敷衍态度引发了大量不良事件报告。
Innov Pharm. 2023 Oct 10;14(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v14i1.4989. eCollection 2023.
5
Adverse Events Involving Radiation Oncology Medical Devices: Comprehensive Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 1991 to 2015.涉及放射肿瘤学医疗设备的不良事件:1991年至2015年美国食品药品监督管理局数据的综合分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jan 1;97(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.050.
6
Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.《安全医疗器械法案》:医院遵守美国食品药品监督管理局新要求的管理指南
Hosp Technol Ser. 1993 Oct;12(11):1-27.
7
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?骨科器械在首次获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市前批准后会发生怎样的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Reporting of Death in US Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Adverse Event Reports in Categories Other Than Death.美国食品和药物管理局医疗器械不良事件报告中除死亡以外其他类别的死亡报告情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Sep 1;181(9):1217-1223. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.3942.
9
United States Food and Drug Administration's 510(k) Pathway: Drawing Implications from the Approvals of Brachytherapy Devices.美国食品药品监督管理局的510(k)路径:从近距离放射治疗设备的批准中得出的启示
Cureus. 2019 Mar 11;11(3):e4230. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4230.
10
Extending the US Food and Drug Administration's Postmarket Authorities.扩大美国食品和药物管理局的上市后监管权。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231313. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1313.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的人工智能医疗设备报告漏洞的范围审查。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Oct 3;7(1):273. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01270-x.
2
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Health Care: Is the Current Food and Drug Administration Regulation Sufficient?医疗保健中的人工智能算法:当前美国食品药品监督管理局的监管是否足够?
JMIR AI. 2023 Jan 16;2:e42940. doi: 10.2196/42940.
3
The value of standards for health datasets in artificial intelligence-based applications.基于人工智能应用的健康数据集标准的价值。
Nat Med. 2023 Nov;29(11):2929-2938. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02608-w. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity.解决人工智能中影响健康公平性的偏差的考量因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 12;6(1):170. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00913-9.
5
More than algorithms: an analysis of safety events involving ML-enabled medical devices reported to the FDA.超越算法:对 FDA 报告的涉及机器学习医疗器械的安全事件的分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Jun 20;30(7):1227-1236. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad065.
6
What Contributes to Diagnostic Error or Delay? A Qualitative Exploration Across Diverse Acute Care Settings in the United States.导致诊断错误或延迟的因素有哪些?美国不同急性护理环境中的定性探讨。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):239-248. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000817.
7
The need for a system view to regulate artificial intelligence/machine learning-based software as medical device.需要一种系统观点来将基于人工智能/机器学习的软件作为医疗设备进行监管。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Apr 7;3:53. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0262-2. eCollection 2020.
8
Electronic health records for the diagnosis of rare diseases.用于罕见病诊断的电子健康记录。
Kidney Int. 2020 Apr;97(4):676-686. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Algorithms on regulatory lockdown in medicine.医学领域监管封锁的算法。
Science. 2019 Dec 6;366(6470):1202-1204. doi: 10.1126/science.aay9547.
10
Diversity in Medical Device Clinical Trials: Do We Know What Works for Which Patients?医疗器械临床试验中的多样性:我们知道哪种方法对哪些患者有效吗?
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):499-529. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12344.