Yang Pengyu, Feng Peng, Tian Guopeng, Zhao Guomin, Yuan Guoqiang, Pan Yawen
The Second Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China; Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China; Key Laboratory of Neurology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China.
The Second Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China; Department of Neurosurgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China; Key Laboratory of Neurology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730030, PR China.
Comput Biol Chem. 2025 May 24;119:108510. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108510.
Gliomas exhibit significant heterogeneity and diverse molecular subtypes, and there are marked differences in treatment strategies and prognoses for gliomas of different grades and molecular types. However, current glioma molecular subtyping systems are still inadequate and often overlook the impact of the original tumour grade. This study focused on the differentially expressed genes between high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs), aiming to construct a classification model that can be used to predict glioma prognosis. Through a comprehensive investigation involving differential expression analysis, weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), proteinprotein interaction (PPI) network analysis, and univariate and multivariate survival analyses, we identified a core set of genes that influence glioma prognosis. Based on these core genes, we developed the novel malignancy prognosis gene score (MGP_Score) model and validated its stability and reliability with external datasets. This scoring system provides a new tool for assessing glioma prognosis. To explore the molecular feature differences between different prognostic subtypes in detail, we employed four machine learning algorithms: generalized linear model (GLM), random forest (RF), support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB). With these algorithms, we successfully identified B2M, SRPX2, and SERPINH1 as specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for the malignant subgroup. These biomarkers can not only effectively distinguish between HGG and LGG but also accurately predict patient survival rates. We not only revealed molecular differences among gliomas but also constructed a prognostic model, validated the effectiveness of the MGP_Score, and identified biomarkers with potential for clinical application. These findings provide a solid foundation and guidance for precision medicine for gliomas, with the potential to improve early diagnosis, personalized treatment, and prognosis assessment.
胶质瘤表现出显著的异质性和多样的分子亚型,不同分级和分子类型的胶质瘤在治疗策略和预后方面存在明显差异。然而,目前的胶质瘤分子亚型分类系统仍然不够完善,常常忽略了原发肿瘤分级的影响。本研究聚焦于高级别胶质瘤(HGG)和低级别胶质瘤(LGG)之间的差异表达基因,旨在构建一个可用于预测胶质瘤预后的分类模型。通过综合运用差异表达分析、加权基因共表达网络分析(WGCNA)、蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用(PPI)网络分析以及单变量和多变量生存分析,我们确定了一组影响胶质瘤预后的核心基因。基于这些核心基因,我们开发了新型恶性预后基因评分(MGP_Score)模型,并利用外部数据集验证了其稳定性和可靠性。该评分系统为评估胶质瘤预后提供了一种新工具。为了详细探究不同预后亚型之间的分子特征差异,我们采用了四种机器学习算法:广义线性模型(GLM)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机递归特征消除(SVM-RFE)和极端梯度提升(XGB)。通过这些算法,我们成功地将B2M、SRPX2和SERPINH1鉴定为恶性亚组的特异性诊断和预后生物标志物。这些生物标志物不仅可以有效区分HGG和LGG,还能准确预测患者的生存率。我们不仅揭示了胶质瘤之间的分子差异,还构建了一个预后模型,验证了MGP_Score的有效性,并鉴定出具有临床应用潜力的生物标志物。这些发现为胶质瘤的精准医学提供了坚实的基础和指导,有可能改善早期诊断、个性化治疗和预后评估。