Huang Wei-Han, Tee Yu-San, Kuo Yu-Chi, Hsu Ting-An, Cheng Chi-Tung, Kang Shih-Ching, Fu Chih-Yuan
Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;95:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.031. Epub 2025 May 23.
In the management of patients with pelvic fractures associated with retroperitoneal hemorrhage, prompt angioembolization is typically required to achieve hemostasis. However, not all institutions are equipped to perform this procedure in a timely manner. This study assessed the impact of time to angioembolization on the outcomes of patients with pelvic fractures. We hypothesize that there is a time threshold for the performance of angioembolization, beyond which patient outcomes may worsen.
The trauma registry system was retrospectively queried for patients treated for pelvic fractures from 2020 to 2023. Patients with unstable hemodynamics who underwent immediate treatment without a comprehensive assessment were excluded. A 5-h cutoff was selected for further analysis on the basis of an observed change in the mortality rate at that time point. The mortality rate and incidence of hypotension were compared between patients who underwent angioembolization within the five-hour window and those who underwent the procedure after the five-hour window. A detailed subset analysis was performed for patients who underwent angioembolization within the five-hour window. Furthermore, potential causes for delayed angioembolization were evaluated.
A total of 130 patients with pelvic fractures who required angioembolization were included in this study; the mean time to the procedure was 2.9 h. Patients who underwent angioembolization within the five-hour window had a lower mortality rate (10.5 % vs. 25.0 %, p = 0.099). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that undergoing angioembolization more than five hours was associated with increased mortality (odds ratio = 3.881, p = 0.083). Additionally, a greater proportion of patients who underwent delayed angioembolization (beyond the five-hour window) were transferred from local hospitals (N = 62, 47.7 %). Among these transferred patients, the time before arrival at the trauma center was significantly longer than the time after arrival at the trauma center (4.7 vs. 2.0 h, p < 0.001).
Angioembolization beyond five hours in normotensive patients presenting to a level I trauma center found to have pelvic fractures with associated retroperitoneal hemorrhage may be associated with worsened outcomes. Early transportation to hospitals with interventional radiology capabilities may be beneficial in this patient group, but a larger, prospective study is needed to confirm these results.
在骨盆骨折合并腹膜后出血患者的治疗中,通常需要及时进行血管栓塞以实现止血。然而,并非所有机构都能及时开展这一手术。本研究评估了血管栓塞时间对骨盆骨折患者治疗结果的影响。我们假设血管栓塞存在一个时间阈值,超过该阈值患者的治疗结果可能会恶化。
回顾性查询创伤登记系统中2020年至2023年接受骨盆骨折治疗的患者。排除血流动力学不稳定且未经全面评估即接受即刻治疗的患者。基于当时观察到的死亡率变化,选择5小时作为进一步分析的截止时间。比较在5小时内接受血管栓塞的患者与在5小时后接受该手术的患者的死亡率和低血压发生率。对在5小时内接受血管栓塞的患者进行了详细的亚组分析。此外,还评估了血管栓塞延迟的潜在原因。
本研究共纳入130例需要进行血管栓塞的骨盆骨折患者;手术平均时间为2.9小时。在5小时内接受血管栓塞的患者死亡率较低(10.5%对25.0%,p = 0.099)。多因素逻辑回归表明,血管栓塞超过5小时与死亡率增加相关(比值比 = 3.881,p = 0.083)。此外,延迟血管栓塞(超过5小时)的患者中,更大比例是从当地医院转诊而来(n = 62,47.7%)。在这些转诊患者中,到达创伤中心之前的时间明显长于到达创伤中心之后的时间(4.7对2.0小时,p < 0.001)。
在I级创伤中心就诊的血压正常、骨盆骨折合并腹膜后出血的患者,血管栓塞超过5小时可能与治疗结果恶化相关。对于这一患者群体,早期转运至具备介入放射学能力的医院可能有益,但需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。