Self-Reported Dystonia and Dystonia on Neurological Examination: Prevalence and Concordance across Time in a Prospectively Followed Essential Tremor Cohort.

INTRODUCTION

Screening questions are important in identifying subgroups of individuals within a target population. Dystonic movements and postures are not uncommon in patients with essential tremor (ET). There is a gap in knowledge - no studies have assessed the validity of a self-report of dystonia in ET patients. We assessed the concordance between self-reported dystonia and the presence or absence of dystonia on examination (DOE).

METHODS

We obtained self-report data from 274 ET cases in a serial study with up to five follow-up evaluations. At each assessment, participants could self-report dystonia, and they underwent a detailed neurological examination, from which a movement disorders neurologist assessed for the presence of DOE.

RESULTS

Across time, the prevalence of self-reported dystonia and DOE ranged from 0.0% to 4.3% and 8.6% to 17.5%, respectively. There were 74 cases with either self-reported dystonia or DOE; in only 3 (4.1%) was there a positive concordance between the two at each of their evaluations. Values for sensitivity ranged from 0.0% to 40%; specificity from 96.1% to 100%; positive predictive value from 0.0% to 67.0% (median 30.0%); and negative predictive value from 83.1% to 94.4%.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides important insights into the validity of self-report data on dystonia in ET and the prevalence of DOE in ET. Our findings suggest that self-reported dystonia was not a valid means to identify DOE in ET.