Santos V G, Carvalho P D, Souza A H, Priskas S, Castro J A L, Pereira A M F, Ross P J, Moreno J, Wiltbank M C, Fricke P M
Departamento de Zootecnia, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Évora, 7002-554, Portugal; MED - Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; ST Genetics, Navasota, TX 77868.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Aug;108(8):8945-8958. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26428. Epub 2025 May 30.
The effect on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) of interval from induction of ovulation to timed artificial insemination (TAI) for cows submitted to a fertility program and the interval from the onset of estrous alert to artificial insemination (AI) for cows inseminated to estrous alert was analyzed in 3 experiments. In experiment 1, multiparous lactating Holstein cows (n = 1,924) from 6 herds were submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol to receive their first TAI using conventional semen. On the day of the last GnRH treatment, cows were randomly assigned to TAI at the time of the last GnRH treatment (Cosynch-56: 0 h) or TAI 16 h after the last GnRH treatment (Ovsynch-56: 16 h). Ovsynch-56 cows had more P/AI than Cosynch-56 cows (46% vs. 36%) 32 d after TAI. In experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows (n = 13,318) from 2 herds were submitted to a Double-Ovsynch protocol to receive their first TAI (n = 14,089; during more than one year) or to a GGPPG protocol for second and greater TAI (n = 6,806) using either sex-sorted Holstein semen or conventional beef semen. Overall, TAI varied from 13 to 23 h after the last GnRH treatment, and there was no linear or quadratic effect of time from the last GnRH treatment to TAI on P/AI 32 d after TAI for cows receiving AI with sex-sorted Holstein semen or conventional beef semen. In experiment 3, lactating dairy cows (n = 10,927) were fitted with an activity-monitoring tag mounted to a neck collar, and the timing of AI relative to the onset of estrous alert was recorded. Timing of AI varied from 0 to 40 h after the onset of estrous alert, and there were both linear and quadratic effects of interval from the onset of estrous alert to AI in which cows inseminated early (≤3 h) or late (≥24 h) after the onset of estrous alert had fewer P/AI 32 d after AI than cows inseminated 13 to 23 h after the onset of estrous alert. We conclude that lactating dairy cows inseminated too early relative to a synchronized ovulation or too early or too late relative to the onset of estrous alert had fewer P/AI than cows inseminated from 13 to 23 h. Further, optimal timing of AI relative to a synchronized ovulation or the onset of estrous alert in lactating dairy cows did not differ between conventional and sex-sorted semen.
在3项试验中,分析了接受繁殖力计划的奶牛从诱导排卵到定时人工授精(TAI)的间隔时间以及发情警报开始到人工授精(AI)的间隔时间对每次人工授精受胎率(P/AI)的影响。在试验1中,来自6个牛群的经产泌乳荷斯坦奶牛(n = 1924头)接受双同期排卵方案,使用常规精液进行首次TAI。在最后一次促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)处理当天,奶牛被随机分配在最后一次GnRH处理时进行TAI(同期排卵-56:0小时)或在最后一次GnRH处理后16小时进行TAI(排卵同步-56:16小时)。TAI后32天,排卵同步-56组奶牛的P/AI高于同期排卵-56组奶牛(46%对36%)。在试验2中,来自2个牛群的泌乳荷斯坦奶牛(n = 13318头)接受双同期排卵方案进行首次TAI(n = 14089次;超过一年),或接受GGPPG方案进行第二次及以后的TAI(n = 6806次),使用性别分选的荷斯坦精液或常规牛肉精液。总体而言,TAI在最后一次GnRH处理后13至23小时之间,对于接受性别分选的荷斯坦精液或常规牛肉精液进行AI的奶牛,从最后一次GnRH处理到TAI的时间对TAI后32天的P/AI没有线性或二次效应。在试验3中,给泌乳奶牛(n = 10927头)佩戴安装在颈圈上的活动监测标签,并记录AI相对于发情警报开始的时间。AI时间在发情警报开始后0至40小时之间,发情警报开始到AI的间隔时间存在线性和二次效应,即发情警报开始后过早(≤3小时)或过晚(≥24小时)进行AI的奶牛,AI后32天的P/AI低于发情警报开始后13至23小时进行AI的奶牛。我们得出结论,相对于同步排卵过早或相对于发情警报开始过早或过晚进行AI的泌乳奶牛,其P/AI低于在13至23小时进行AI的奶牛。此外,对于泌乳奶牛,相对于同步排卵或发情警报开始而言,AI的最佳时间在常规精液和性别分选精液之间没有差异。