Gajjar Avi A, Chen John Y, Prabhala Tarun, Custozzo Amanda, Boulos Alan S, Dalfino John C, Field Nicholas C, Paul Alexandra R
Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 2:15910199251342854. doi: 10.1177/15910199251342854.
IntroductionLarge vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are a significant cause of disability and death globally. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EVT) has improved outcomes for LVO patients. However, the impact of pre-existing frailty on outcomes for patients undergoing EVT remains understudied.MethodsThis study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to identify patients aged 18 and older who underwent EVT for LVO of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) from 2016 to 2021. Frailty was assessed using the modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5), mFI-11, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and Risk Analysis Index (RAI). Outcomes analyzed included mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and cost of care.ResultsWe analyzed 57,260 EVT admissions. Patients classified as highly frail by the CCI had the highest in-hospital mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, p < 0.0001). High frailty identified by mFI-5 was associated with a higher likelihood of postoperative complications (OR 1.41, p < 0.0001) and extended LOS (OR 1.23, p < 0.0001). High frailty by the administrative RAI was linked to nonhome discharge (OR 1.31, p < 0.0001), with mFI-5 showing similar predictive value (OR 1.30, p < 0.0001). High frailty, as determined by the CCI, incurred the highest estimated cost of care (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsFrailty assessment using mFI-5 is a practical predictor of patient outcomes in LVO thrombectomy, including complication rates, extended LOS, and discharge disposition. The CCI remains the most predictive for mortality, though it is more complex to calculate. We emphasize that frailty, as measured by the mFI-5, is one of many factors to consider when deciding on EVT for LVO.
引言
大血管闭塞(LVO)性中风是全球致残和死亡的重要原因。血管内机械取栓术(EVT)改善了LVO患者的治疗结果。然而,预先存在的虚弱对接受EVT治疗患者的预后影响仍未得到充分研究。
方法
本研究利用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库,识别2016年至2021年期间因颈内动脉(ICA)或大脑中动脉(MCA)的LVO而接受EVT治疗的18岁及以上患者。使用改良的虚弱指数-5(mFI-5)、mFI-11、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)和风险分析指数(RAI)评估虚弱程度。分析的结果包括死亡率、并发症、住院时间(LOS)、出院处置和护理费用。
结果
我们分析了57260例EVT住院病例。CCI分类为高度虚弱的患者院内死亡率最高(优势比(OR)1.13,p<0.0001)。mFI-5识别出的高度虚弱与术后并发症的可能性更高(OR 1.41,p<0.0001)和住院时间延长(OR 1.23,p<0.0001)相关。行政RAI确定的高度虚弱与非家庭出院相关(OR 1.31,p<0.0001),mFI-5显示出类似的预测价值(OR 1.30,p<0.0001)。CCI确定的高度虚弱导致估计护理费用最高(p< .0001)。
结论
使用mFI-5进行虚弱评估是LVO取栓术患者预后的实用预测指标,包括并发症发生率、住院时间延长和出院处置。CCI对死亡率的预测性仍然最高,尽管其计算更复杂。我们强调,mFI-5测量的虚弱是决定LVO患者是否进行EVT时要考虑的众多因素之一。