Eshetawe Samar, Hijji Alaa, Almejaiwl Sarah, Alqahtani Mohammad, Alotaibi Fawaz F, Mohammad Saida, Alabdely Hani, Alanazi Abdelmajeed, Almansour Nouf, Alrashed Abdullah, Alakili Riyadh, AlKawi Ammar, Alreshaid Abdulrahman A, AlZawahmah Mohamed, AlHazzani Adel, Shuaib Ashfaq, Alrohimi Anas, Al-Ajlan Fahad S
Neuroscience Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Scientific Computing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 2:15910199251343400. doi: 10.1177/15910199251343400.
BackgroundDespite the excellent recanalization rates following thrombectomy, significantly fewer patients have favorable outcomes. Impaired reperfusion of the microcirculation caused by distal thrombi could contribute to that, and adjunctive intraarterial thrombolysis such as alteplase (IA-tPA) might improve outcomes. We assessed the impact of adjunctive IA-tPA following thrombectomy with TICI score 2A on functional outcomes and reperfusion status.MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with LVO ischemic stroke who underwent EVT. Patients were dichotomized into those who received EVT + IA-tPA vs EVT alone. Primary outcomes were favorable functional outcome (90-day mRS 0-2), and 90-day home-time.Results354 patients were included, of which 133 (37.6%) were treated with EVT + IA-tPA and 221 (62.4%) were treated with EVT alone. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. The non-IA-tPA group had a significant proportion of patients with higher baseline TICI scores (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rate of favorable functional outcomes between patients who received IA-tPA vs those who did not (59.8% vs 66.1%; = 0.27), 90-day home time was 77 (69-83) vs 66 (60-81) days, p = 0.26. There was no difference in the rate of sICH (2.2% vs 2.3%; P = 0.99), and mortality (15% vs 8.3%; P = 0.06). IA-tPA resulted in a significant improvement in TICI scores from 33.3% to 62.9% and was 3.4 times more likely to improve reperfusion status.ConclusionIA-tPA following thrombectomy with TICI score 2A appeared to be safe and improved the final TICI score; however, this angiographic improvement did not translate into functional outcomes.
尽管血栓切除术的再通率很高,但获得良好预后的患者却少得多。远端血栓导致的微循环再灌注受损可能是原因之一,而辅助性动脉内溶栓(如阿替普酶,IA-tPA)可能会改善预后。我们评估了TICI评分2A的血栓切除术后辅助IA-tPA对功能预后和再灌注状态的影响。
对接受血管内治疗(EVT)的大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为接受EVT + IA-tPA组和单纯EVT组。主要结局为良好的功能预后(90天改良Rankin量表评分0-2分)和90天回家时间。
共纳入354例患者,其中133例(37.6%)接受EVT + IA-tPA治疗,221例(62.4%)接受单纯EVT治疗。两组的基线特征相似。非IA-tPA组中基线TICI评分较高的患者比例显著更高(P < 0.0001)。接受IA-tPA治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者相比,良好功能预后的发生率无显著差异(59.8%对66.1%;P = 0.27),90天回家时间分别为77(69-83)天和66(60-81)天,P = 0.26。症状性颅内出血的发生率无差异(2.2%对2.3%;P = 0.99),死亡率也无差异(15%对8.3%;P = 0.06)。IA-tPA使TICI评分从33.3%显著提高到62.9%,改善再灌注状态的可能性高出3.4倍。
TICI评分2A的血栓切除术后IA-tPA似乎是安全的,并改善了最终TICI评分;然而,这种血管造影改善并未转化为功能预后。