• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弹道伤的战略护理:摩洛哥一家军事医院的回顾性观察研究

Strategic Care of Ballistic Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Moroccan Military Hospital.

作者信息

Khalkane S, Elabdi Monsef, Serghini Issam, Qamouss Youssef, Seddiki Rachid

机构信息

Cardiovascular Anesthesiology, Hopital Militaire d'instruction MedV, Rabat, MAR.

Trauma and Orthopedics, Hassan II Military Hospital, Laayoune, MAR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85162. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85162. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.85162
PMID:40452689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12126751/
Abstract

Background Ballistic trauma from high-velocity projectiles causes severe multisystem injury and rapid physiological decline. While well-characterized in combat and civilian violence, accidental firearm injuries during military training remain understudied. These incidents typically affect young, unprotected individuals in settings with limited prehospital care factors that may influence injury patterns and outcomes. This study aims to describe the clinical features, injury profiles, and management of accidental ballistic trauma in a military training context, with implications for prevention, triage, and critical care in resource-limited settings. Methods We conducted a six-year retrospective observational study (2016-2021) at Hassan II Military Hospital, Morocco, including 32 consecutive male patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for accidental high-velocity ballistic trauma sustained during military training. Injuries were caused by North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-standard live ammunition (5.56 × 45 mm or 7.62 × 51 mm). No exclusions were applied. Data collected included demographics, injury characteristics, prehospital care, hemodynamic parameters at admission, surgeries, and outcomes. ICU admission followed institutional protocols based on hemodynamic instability, high trauma burden, or need for invasive support. Outcomes were classified as favorable (ICU discharge without major complications) or unfavorable (mortality, organ failure, or reoperation). The study received ethics approval from the Institutional Committee of Hassan II Military Hospital. Results The mean age was 30.7 years; half of the patients were aged 31-40. Multiregional injuries were frequent: limb trauma (50%), abdominal injury (37.5%), and neurological impairment (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 9-13 in 37.5%). On ICU admission, tachypnea (62.5%), tachycardia (50%), and hypotension (37.5%) were common. Most patients (87.5%) underwent surgery (60% orthopedic and 40% abdominal), with a mean delay of 13.2 ± 7.3 hours, mainly due to prehospital transfer and imaging delays. Intensive monitoring was required in 62.5%. Injury Severity Score (ISS) ranged from 12 to 32, indicating moderate-to-severe trauma in over one-third of patients. Favorable outcomes were observed in 62.5%. Unfavorable outcomes (37.5%), including mortality and reoperation, were significantly associated with older age, comorbidities, hypotension, mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg, and oliguria (p < 0.05). Conclusion Accidental ballistic trauma during military training is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly when early hemodynamic instability is present. Findings support early triage, aggressive resuscitation, and application of damage control principles at the point of injury ("damage control at ground zero") as critical strategies. Although limited by its retrospective, single-center design and small sample, this study provides foundational evidence to guide trauma protocols and improve care delivery in resource-limited military environments.

摘要

背景 高速射弹造成的弹道创伤会导致严重的多系统损伤和生理功能迅速衰退。虽然在战斗和民用暴力中已有充分描述,但军事训练期间的意外枪支伤害仍未得到充分研究。这些事件通常影响年轻、未受保护的个体,且发生在院前护理因素有限的环境中,这些因素可能会影响损伤模式和结果。本研究旨在描述军事训练背景下意外弹道创伤的临床特征、损伤情况及管理,为资源有限环境下的预防、分诊和重症护理提供参考。方法 我们在摩洛哥哈桑二世军事医院进行了一项为期六年的回顾性观察研究(2016 - 2021年),纳入32例因军事训练期间意外高速弹道创伤而入住重症监护病房(ICU)的连续男性患者。损伤由北大西洋公约组织(NATO)标准实弹(5.56×45毫米或7.62×51毫米)造成。未进行排除。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、损伤特征、院前护理、入院时的血流动力学参数、手术情况及结果。根据血流动力学不稳定、高创伤负担或需要有创支持等情况,按照机构规程收治入ICU。结果分为良好(ICU出院且无重大并发症)或不良(死亡、器官衰竭或再次手术)。本研究获得了哈桑二世军事医院机构委员会的伦理批准。结果 平均年龄为30.7岁;一半患者年龄在31 - 40岁。多部位损伤很常见:肢体创伤(50%)、腹部损伤(37.5%)以及神经功能障碍(格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS):37.5%的患者评分为9 - 13分)。入住ICU时,呼吸急促(62.5%)、心动过速(50%)和低血压(37.5%)很常见。大多数患者(87.5%)接受了手术(60%为骨科手术,40%为腹部手术),平均延迟时间为13.2±7.3小时,主要原因是院前转运和影像学检查延迟。62.5%的患者需要加强监测。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)范围为12至32分,表明超过三分之一的患者为中重度创伤。62.5%的患者获得了良好结果。不良结果(37.5%),包括死亡和再次手术,与年龄较大、合并症、低血压、平均动脉压(MAP)<65 mmHg以及少尿显著相关(p<0.05)。结论 军事训练期间的意外弹道创伤与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,尤其是在早期存在血流动力学不稳定的情况下。研究结果支持早期分诊、积极复苏以及在受伤时应用损伤控制原则(“在零地面进行损伤控制”)作为关键策略。尽管本研究受其回顾性、单中心设计和小样本量的限制,但提供了基础证据以指导创伤治疗方案并改善资源有限的军事环境中的医疗服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/cd265076cb1f/cureus-0017-00000085162-i20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/172721758fc2/cureus-0017-00000085162-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/542dc664ea31/cureus-0017-00000085162-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/b4821add3a38/cureus-0017-00000085162-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c4251fcfdbe5/cureus-0017-00000085162-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/1c7b688c4959/cureus-0017-00000085162-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c6c247c0ab29/cureus-0017-00000085162-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c86998e0ff9b/cureus-0017-00000085162-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7e1cebda352c/cureus-0017-00000085162-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/46babdd68801/cureus-0017-00000085162-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/130bd3087af3/cureus-0017-00000085162-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/9dacd352bd0a/cureus-0017-00000085162-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7b6b88710c39/cureus-0017-00000085162-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c65ebbaa517e/cureus-0017-00000085162-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/d7e3256fafdc/cureus-0017-00000085162-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/34d7777ad0e2/cureus-0017-00000085162-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/9f4306dc753a/cureus-0017-00000085162-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/0e6508a6f8ac/cureus-0017-00000085162-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7eee7e023205/cureus-0017-00000085162-i18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/db2f037ea13c/cureus-0017-00000085162-i19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/cd265076cb1f/cureus-0017-00000085162-i20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/172721758fc2/cureus-0017-00000085162-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/542dc664ea31/cureus-0017-00000085162-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/b4821add3a38/cureus-0017-00000085162-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c4251fcfdbe5/cureus-0017-00000085162-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/1c7b688c4959/cureus-0017-00000085162-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c6c247c0ab29/cureus-0017-00000085162-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c86998e0ff9b/cureus-0017-00000085162-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7e1cebda352c/cureus-0017-00000085162-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/46babdd68801/cureus-0017-00000085162-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/130bd3087af3/cureus-0017-00000085162-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/9dacd352bd0a/cureus-0017-00000085162-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7b6b88710c39/cureus-0017-00000085162-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/c65ebbaa517e/cureus-0017-00000085162-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/d7e3256fafdc/cureus-0017-00000085162-i14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/34d7777ad0e2/cureus-0017-00000085162-i15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/9f4306dc753a/cureus-0017-00000085162-i16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/0e6508a6f8ac/cureus-0017-00000085162-i17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/7eee7e023205/cureus-0017-00000085162-i18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/db2f037ea13c/cureus-0017-00000085162-i19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d31f/12126751/cd265076cb1f/cureus-0017-00000085162-i20.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategic Care of Ballistic Injuries: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Moroccan Military Hospital.弹道伤的战略护理:摩洛哥一家军事医院的回顾性观察研究
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85162. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85162. eCollection 2025 May.
2
EMS Tactical Damage Control Resuscitation Protocol紧急医疗服务战术损伤控制复苏方案
3
How Common Are Civilian Blast Injuries in the National Trauma Databank, and What Are the Most Common Mechanisms and Characteristics of Associated Injuries?平民爆炸伤在国家创伤数据库中有多常见,其最常见的致伤机制和损伤特征是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Apr 1;479(4):683-691. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001642.
4
Civilian ballistic spinal cord injuries versus blunt trauma: comparative analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes.平民弹道脊髓损伤与钝性创伤:临床特征、治疗及预后的对比分析
Spine J. 2025 Mar;25(3):568-580. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
5
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
6
Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.运用 META 方法对大量伤员事件进行院前分诊用于早期外科评估:医院创伤登记处的回顾性验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1040-6. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Institutional Experience and Orthoplastic Collaboration Associated with Improved Flap-based Limb Salvage Outcomes.机构经验和整形协作与改善基于皮瓣的肢体保肢结果相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2388-2396. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001925.
8
Description and prognostic factors of a cohort of polytraumatized patients with spinal injury in a level I trauma center.一级创伤中心多创伤合并脊髓损伤患者队列的描述及预后因素
Injury. 2025 Jun;56(6):112319. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112319. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
9
Trauma intensive care unit (TICU) at Hamad General Hospital.哈马德总医院创伤重症监护病房(TICU)。
Qatar Med J. 2020 Feb 6;2019(2):5. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.5. eCollection 2019.
10
[Even more critical medicine: a retrospective analysis of casualties admitted to the intensive care unit in the Spanish Military Hospital in Herat (Afghanistan)].[更危急的医学:对阿富汗赫拉特西班牙军事医院重症监护病房收治伤员的回顾性分析]
Med Intensiva. 2011 Apr;35(3):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.01.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Urologic Trauma Management for Military Providers.军事医疗人员的泌尿外科创伤管理
Mil Med. 2025 Jan 16;190(1-2):e82-e89. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae341.
2
Effectiveness of Mannheim's Peritonitis Index in Patients With Peritonitis Secondary to Hollow Viscus Perforation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Jharkhand, India.曼海姆腹膜炎指数在印度贾坎德邦一家三级护理医院中空脏器穿孔继发腹膜炎患者中的有效性
Cureus. 2024 May 4;16(5):e59631. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59631. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Autologous Alternative Vein Grafts for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Absence of Single-Segment Great Saphenous Vein: A Single-Center Study.
自身静脉移植物在股浅动脉旁路术在单一节段大隐静脉缺失时的应用:单中心研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;103:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.067. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
4
Firearm-Related Traumatic Brain Injuries in Adults: A Scoping Review.成人与枪支相关的创伤性脑损伤:范围综述。
Neurosurgery. 2024 Feb 1;94(2):229-239. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002734. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
5
Humerus fractures: selecting fixation for a successful outcome.肱骨骨折:选择固定方式以获得成功的治疗结果。
OTA Int. 2023 Jun 16;6(3 Suppl):e259. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000259. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Risk factors for the leakage of the repair of duodenal wounds: a secondary analysis of the Panamerican Trauma Society multicenter retrospective review.十二指肠伤口修复渗漏的危险因素:泛美创伤学会多中心回顾性研究的二次分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr 4;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00494-8.
7
Russia's Hybrid Warfare in Ukraine Threatens Both Healthcare & Health Protections Provided by International Law.俄罗斯在乌克兰的混合战争威胁到了医疗保健以及国际法所提供的健康保护。
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Jan 23;89(1):3. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4022. eCollection 2023.
8
Blunt pancreatic trauma: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm.钝性胰腺创伤:西部创伤协会关键决策算法。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Mar 1;94(3):455-460. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003794. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
9
Blunt splenic trauma: Analysis of predictors and risk factors affecting the non-operative management failure rate.钝性脾损伤:影响非手术治疗失败率的预测因素和危险因素分析。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1428-1436. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.95476.
10
Management of conflict injuries to the upper limb. Part 1: assessment and early surgical care.上肢冲突伤的处理。第 1 部分:评估和早期手术治疗。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 Jul;47(7):687-697. doi: 10.1177/17531934221098916. Epub 2022 May 17.