Suppr超能文献

协助我们记录我们已经开展的工作:针对社会风险知情护理的临床决策支持工具的试点研究。

Help us document what we already do: pilot study of clinical decision support tools targeting social risk-informed care.

作者信息

Pisciotta Maura, Morrissey Suzanne, Bunce Arwen, Gottlieb Laura M, Donovan Jenna, Watkins Shelby L, Middendorf Mary, Sheppler Christina R, Edelmann Anna C, Gold Rachel

机构信息

OCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR 97228, United States.

VA Bedford Healthcare System, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Bedford, MA 01730, United States.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2025 May 30;8(3):ooaf045. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf045. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about how clinical decision support (CDS) tools can support care teams in changing clinical decisions to account for patients' social risks. We piloted a suite of electronic health record (EHR)-based CDS tools designed to facilitate social risk-informed care decisions to assess how the tools were used in practice and how they could be improved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After developing CDS tools through a process involving clinic staff and patient engagement, the tools were implemented in three community health center clinics. Data from staff interviews, observations of meetings with clinic staff, and the EHR were used to understand tool use patterns, and to yield insights that were then used to inform tool revisions.

RESULTS

The overarching suggestion derived from the study data was that the tools should shift from making care recommendations to instead supporting documentation of social risk-related actions that clinical team members had already taken. Other revisions were guided by four additional insights: the CDS tools should: (1) facilitate documentation in standardized, short formats, (2) make documentation easy and consistent, (3) support work distribution across care team members, and (4) ensure documentation could serve multiple purposes.

DISCUSSION

The CDS tools were revised to improve usefulness and acceptability for primary care teams in community clinics that serve patients with social risks. Numerous challenges exist in designing tools that can accommodate diverse clinics and workflows.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide insights on how CDS tools can be optimized for social risk-informed care while minimizing care team burdens.

摘要

目的

关于临床决策支持(CDS)工具如何支持医疗团队改变临床决策以考虑患者的社会风险,目前所知甚少。我们试点了一套基于电子健康记录(EHR)的CDS工具,旨在促进基于社会风险的医疗决策,以评估这些工具在实际中的使用情况以及如何改进。

材料与方法

通过一个涉及诊所工作人员和患者参与的过程开发CDS工具后,这些工具在三个社区健康中心诊所实施。来自工作人员访谈、与诊所工作人员会议的观察以及电子健康记录的数据被用于了解工具使用模式,并产生见解,然后用于指导工具修订。

结果

从研究数据得出的总体建议是,这些工具应从提出护理建议转变为支持记录临床团队成员已经采取的与社会风险相关的行动。其他修订则由另外四个见解指导:CDS工具应:(1)以标准化的简短格式促进记录,(2)使记录轻松且一致,(3)支持护理团队成员之间的工作分配,(4)确保记录可用于多种目的。

讨论

对CDS工具进行了修订,以提高其对为有社会风险患者服务的社区诊所基层医疗团队的实用性和可接受性。在设计能够适应不同诊所和工作流程的工具方面存在许多挑战。

结论

这些发现为如何优化CDS工具以实现基于社会风险的医疗提供了见解,同时将医疗团队的负担降至最低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcba/12124400/1dbb984f32e8/ooaf045f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验