Suárez-Balsera Carlos, Ferioli Davide, Marín-Cascales Elena, Rago Vincenzo, Spyrou Konstantinos, Martínez-Serrano Antonio, Mauro Debora Di, Marín José Manuel, Alcaraz Pedro E, Freitas Tomás T
UCAM Research Center for High Performance Sport, UCAM Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dental Sciences, and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
J Hum Kinet. 2025 Apr 30;96(Spec Issue):83-95. doi: 10.5114/jhk/196138. eCollection 2025 Feb.
This study aimed to examine different force-time derived variables of the countermovement jump (CMJ) in adult, male basketball players of different competitive levels and playing positions. At the beginning of the pre-season, 78 players from two competitive levels (professional and semi-professional) completed a CMJ test on a force plate. Linear mixed models were used to compare a total of 21 metrics across competitive levels and playing positions. Professional players jumped significantly higher (p = 0.022) than semi-professionals. No differences were observed in the variables related to the eccentric phase. Four concentric phase variables (i.e., absolute peak force [p < 0.001], absolute and relative peak power [p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively] and peak velocity [p = 0.036]) were superior in professional in comparison to semi-professional players. Regarding the playing position, centers presented significantly larger deceleration phase duration than guards (p = 0.042). Centers reported higher absolute eccentric peak force than guards (p = 0.013). In the concentric phase, centers reported larger concentric duration than forwards (p = 0.011) and guards (p = 0.002). Guards produced lower absolute peak force compared to centers (p = 0.004) and forwards (p = 0.025). Furthermore, centers were characterized by lower levels of relative peak force (p = 0.013), but higher levels of absolute peak power compared to guards (p = 0.003). In conclusion, jump height, and only four concentric-phase metrics were found to discriminate between competitive levels. Additionally, the eccentric deceleration phase duration, absolute eccentric peak force, concentric duration, absolute and relative peak force and absolute peak power discriminated between playing positions. Practitioners should conduct thorough CMJ analyses and consider these metrics from a performance and talent identification perspective.
本研究旨在考察不同竞技水平和比赛位置的成年男性篮球运动员在反向纵跳(CMJ)中不同的力-时间衍生变量。在季前赛开始时,来自两个竞技水平(职业和半职业)的78名运动员在测力台上完成了CMJ测试。使用线性混合模型比较了不同竞技水平和比赛位置的总共21个指标。职业球员的跳跃高度显著高于半职业球员(p = 0.022)。在与离心阶段相关的变量中未观察到差异。与半职业球员相比,职业球员的四个向心阶段变量(即绝对峰值力[p < 0.001]、绝对和相对峰值功率[p分别为< 0.001和p = 0.037]以及峰值速度[p = 0.036])更优。关于比赛位置,中锋的减速阶段持续时间显著长于后卫(p = 0.042)。中锋的绝对离心峰值力高于后卫(p = 0.013)。在向心阶段,中锋的向心持续时间长于前锋(p = 0.011)和后卫(p = 0.002)。与中锋(p = 0.004)和前锋(p = 0.025)相比,后卫产生的绝对峰值力较低。此外,与后卫相比,中锋的相对峰值力水平较低(p = 0.013),但绝对峰值功率水平较高(p = 0.003)。总之,发现跳跃高度以及仅四个向心阶段指标能够区分竞技水平。此外,离心减速阶段持续时间、绝对离心峰值力、向心持续时间、绝对和相对峰值力以及绝对峰值功率能够区分比赛位置。从业者应进行全面的CMJ分析,并从表现和人才识别的角度考虑这些指标。