• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节盂凹陷修复对关节镜下骨性Bankart修复术后手术失败的影响。

Effect of Glenoid Concavity Restoration on Surgical Failure after Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair.

作者信息

Park In, Kim Dong-Hyeon, Shin Sang-Jin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):470-477. doi: 10.4055/cios24347. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

DOI:10.4055/cios24347
PMID:40454130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12104029/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the degree of glenoid concavity restoration and its effect on surgical failure after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a bony Bankart lesion were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) preoperatively to evaluate the glenoid concavity using the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR). Bony fragments were incorporated to the anterior glenoid during arthroscopic stabilization procedure. All patients were reevaluated by 3D-CT at postoperative 1 year to assess the changes in the BSSR and the final glenoid bone defect size after bony Bankart repair. Clinical outcomes including surgical failure were evaluated at least 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

The BSSR significantly increased after surgery (26.0% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 35.5% ± 13.2% postoperatively, < 0.001). Preoperative glenoid bone defect size was 16.2% ± 8.1%, and bony Bankart fragment size was 11.3% ± 7.2%. Four patients (9.8%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery. In patients with surgical failure, the BSSR was not improved after surgery (18.2% ± 13.3% preoperatively and 23.1% ± 17.3% postoperatively, = 0.24). In contrast, patients without surgical failure showed significantly improved BSSR after surgery (26.9% ± 14.0% preoperatively and 36.9% ± 12.2% postoperatively, < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the final glenoid bone defect size (6.6% ± 5.9% in patients with surgical failure vs. 6.2% ± 5.7% in patients without surgical failure, = 0.92) and bony Bankart fragment nonunion rate (0% in patients with surgical failure vs. 5.4% in patients without surgical failure, = 0.99) between patients with and without surgical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid concavity, as represented by the BSSR, improved after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair, and satisfactory restoration of the glenoid concavity led to successful clinical outcomes without surgical failure. The BSSR could be considered an important factor for predicting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair. However, further research including more contributing factors is needed to better analyze the impact of the BSSR on clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估关节镜下骨性Bankart损伤修复治疗复发性肩关节前脱位时,肩胛盂凹陷的恢复程度及其对手术失败的影响。

方法

回顾性分析41例行关节镜下骨性Bankart损伤修复治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的患者。所有患者术前均行三维计算机断层扫描(3D-CT),采用骨性肩关节稳定率(BSSR)评估肩胛盂凹陷情况。关节镜下稳定手术过程中将骨块固定于肩胛盂前部。所有患者术后1年行3D-CT复查,评估BSSR变化及骨性Bankart损伤修复术后最终肩胛盂骨缺损大小。术后至少2年评估包括手术失败在内的临床结局。

结果

术后BSSR显著增加(术前26.0%±14.0%,术后35.5%±13.2%,<0.001)。术前肩胛盂骨缺损大小为16.2%±8.1%,骨性Bankart损伤骨块大小为11.3%±7.2%。4例患者(9.8%)出现复发性脱位,需要翻修手术。手术失败患者术后BSSR未改善(术前18.2%±13.3%,术后23.1%±17.3%,=0.24)。相比之下,未发生手术失败的患者术后BSSR显著改善(术前26.9%±14.0%,术后36.9%±12.2%,<0.001)。手术失败组与未失败组患者最终肩胛盂骨缺损大小(手术失败组6.6%±5.9%,未失败组6.2%±5.7%,=0.92)及骨性Bankart损伤骨块不愈合率(手术失败组0%,未失败组5.4%,=0.99)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

关节镜下骨性Bankart损伤修复术后,以BSSR表示的肩胛盂凹陷得到改善,肩胛盂凹陷的满意恢复可带来成功的临床结局,避免手术失败。BSSR可被视为预测关节镜下骨性Bankart损伤修复术后临床结局的重要因素。然而,需要进一步研究包括更多影响因素,以更好地分析BSSR对临床结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c919/12104029/748bdd62c4df/cios-17-470-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c919/12104029/b024e2a80e5c/cios-17-470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c919/12104029/748bdd62c4df/cios-17-470-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c919/12104029/b024e2a80e5c/cios-17-470-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c919/12104029/748bdd62c4df/cios-17-470-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Glenoid Concavity Restoration on Surgical Failure after Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair.关节盂凹陷修复对关节镜下骨性Bankart修复术后手术失败的影响。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun;17(3):470-477. doi: 10.4055/cios24347. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Correlation of Glenoid Concavity With Surgical Failure After Arthroscopic Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.关节镜下稳定治疗复发性肩关节前不稳定术后失败与肩盂后倾相关性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3845-3850. doi: 10.1177/03635465231203152. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Effects of Bone Incorporation After Arthroscopic Stabilization Surgery for Bony Bankart Lesion Based on Preoperative Glenoid Defect Size.基于术前肩盂缺损大小的关节镜下稳定术治疗骨性 Bankart 损伤后骨融合的效果。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2177-2184. doi: 10.1177/0363546518773317. Epub 2018 May 23.
4
Bone fragment union and remodeling after arthroscopic bony bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect: influence on postoperative recurrence of instability.关节镜下骨性Bankart修复治疗合并肩胛盂缺损的创伤性前肩不稳后的骨块愈合与重塑:对术后不稳复发的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1438-47. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571555. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
5
Effect of glenoid concavity loss on shoulder stability- a case report in a professional wrestler.肩胛盂凹陷丧失对肩部稳定性的影响——一名职业摔跤运动员的病例报告
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 22;17(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1210-9.
6
How does anterior glenoid bone loss affect shoulder stability? A cadaveric analysis of glenoid concavity and bony shoulder stability ratio.前盂肱骨丢失如何影响肩部稳定性?盂肱关节凹和骨性肩稳定性比值的尸体分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):553-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
7
Clinical Outcome and Glenoid Morphology After Arthroscopic Repair of Chronic Osseous Bankart Lesions: A Five to Eight-Year Follow-up Study.慢性骨性Bankart损伤关节镜修复术后的临床结果与肩胛盂形态:一项5至8年的随访研究
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov 18;97(22):1833-43. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01033.
8
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Adolescent Anterior Shoulder Instability: Clinical and Imaging Predictors of Revision Surgery and Recurrent Subjective Instability.关节镜下 Bankart 修复术治疗青少年复发性肩关节前向不稳:翻修手术和复发性主观不稳定的临床和影像学预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Mar;51(4):877-884. doi: 10.1177/03635465231151250. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
9
Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation of the classic Bankart repair leads to satisfactory clinical and functional mid-term outcomes in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and less than a subcritical glenoid bone loss.对于复发性肩关节前向不稳且肩胛盂骨丢失未达临界程度的患者,在经典Bankart修复术中进行关节镜下肩胛下肌增强术可带来满意的中期临床和功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 May;33(5):1826-1833. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12483. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
10
Influence of Glenoid Defect Size and Bone Fragment Size on the Clinical Outcome After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Male Collision/Contact Athletes.关节盂缺损大小和骨块大小对男性碰撞/接触性运动员关节镜下Bankart修复术后临床结果的影响
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):1967-1974. doi: 10.1177/0363546517700864. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation of Glenoid Concavity With Surgical Failure After Arthroscopic Stabilization for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.关节镜下稳定治疗复发性肩关节前不稳定术后失败与肩盂后倾相关性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2023 Dec;51(14):3845-3850. doi: 10.1177/03635465231203152. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Lesion prevalence and patient outcome comparison between primary and recurrent anterior shoulder instability.初次和复发性肩关节前不稳定的病变发生率和患者结局比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Sep;32(9):1812-1818. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.029. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Arthroscopic double-row bridge fixation provided satisfactory shoulder functional restoration with high union rate for acute anterior glenoid fracture.
关节镜下双排桥固定治疗急性前盂唇骨折可满意恢复肩关节功能,且愈合率高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07389-w. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
Is preoperative glenoid defect size a reliable indicator of postoperative recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair in teenage competitive athletes?术前盂肱关节骨缺损大小是否能可靠预测青少年运动员经关节镜 Bankart 修复术后的复发性肩关节前脱位?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
5
Cartilage decisively shapes the glenoid concavity and contributes significantly to shoulder stability.软骨对于肩盂窝的形态有决定性的影响,并对肩部稳定性有重要贡献。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Nov;30(11):3626-3633. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06968-7. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
6
How does anterior glenoid bone loss affect shoulder stability? A cadaveric analysis of glenoid concavity and bony shoulder stability ratio.前盂肱骨丢失如何影响肩部稳定性?盂肱关节凹和骨性肩稳定性比值的尸体分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):553-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
7
The Anatomy of Glenoid Concavity-Bony and Osteochondral Assessment of a Stability-Related Parameter.肩胛盂凹陷的解剖结构——与稳定性相关参数的骨性及骨软骨评估
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 22;10(19):4316. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194316.
8
"Double-Pulley" Dual-Row Technique for Arthroscopic Fixation of Large Bony Bankart Lesion: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up With CT Evaluation.关节镜下固定大型骨性Bankart损伤的“双滑轮”双排技术:CT评估的至少2年随访
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):23259671211029239. doi: 10.1177/23259671211029239. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Evaluation of variations of the glenoid attachment of the inferior glenohumeral ligament by magnetic resonance arthrography.通过磁共振关节造影评估下盂肱韧带盂附着部的变异情况。
Radiol Bras. 2021 May-Jun;54(3):148-154. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0043.
10
Glenoid concavity has a higher impact on shoulder stability than the size of a bony defect.肩盂窝的凹陷程度对肩部稳定性的影响大于骨缺损的大小。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Aug;29(8):2631-2639. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06562-3. Epub 2021 Apr 11.