Suppr超能文献

单剂量与双剂量腹横肌平面阻滞用于下段剖宫产术的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究

Clinical Efficacy of Single- Dual-Level Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Lower Segment Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

作者信息

Cao Wan-Na, Qiu Bei, Li Ying, Hu Chang-Long, Liu Hua-Cheng, Yuan Kai-Ming, Wang Fang-Yi

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Taizhou Women and Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, 318000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Ministry of Education, Wenzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 May 26;18:2689-2698. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S520944. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been widely used for lower-segment cesarean sections (CS). However, traditional single-level TAPB may not provide sufficient analgesia for parturients. This study aimed to validate whether dual-level TAPB could offer more extensive blocking and better clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 114 full-term parturients undergoing lower-segment CS were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either single-level (group SL) or dual-level (group DL) TAPB. Dual-level TAPB was performed at the umbilical level and the level above the anterior superior iliac spine, while single-level was performed only at the umbilical level. The primary outcome was the proportion of the abdomen successfully blocked 20 minutes after TAPB.

RESULTS

Twenty minutes after TAPB, dual-level TAPB resulted in a more extensive cutaneous sensory block compared to single-level TAPB. The difference in the proportion of successfully blocked zones was statistically significant, with 46.9% (43.8%, 53.1%) in group SL 71.9% (62.5%, 75.0%) in group DL, < 0.001. Notably, the proportion of parturients with the "surgical area" completely blocked was significantly higher in group DL (94.7%) than in group SL (82.5%) ( = 0.039). Compared to Group SL, the first request for postoperative analgesia was delayed in Group DL by 2.5 hours.

CONCLUSION

Compared to traditional single-level TAPB, dual-level TAPB produced more extensive cutaneous sensory block and better postoperative analgesia effects.

摘要

目的

腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)已广泛应用于下段剖宫产术(CS)。然而,传统的单平面TAPB可能无法为产妇提供足够的镇痛效果。本研究旨在验证双平面TAPB是否能提供更广泛的阻滞范围和更好的临床效果。

方法

本前瞻性、随机、对照研究共纳入114例行下段剖宫产术的足月产妇。受试者被随机分配接受单平面(SL组)或双平面(DL组)TAPB。双平面TAPB在脐水平和髂前上棘上方水平进行,而单平面仅在脐水平进行。主要结局是TAPB后20分钟腹部成功阻滞的比例。

结果

TAPB后20分钟,与单平面TAPB相比,双平面TAPB导致更广泛的皮肤感觉阻滞。成功阻滞区域比例的差异具有统计学意义,SL组为46.9%(43.8%,53.1%),DL组为71.9%(62.5%,75.0%),P<0.001。值得注意的是,“手术区域”完全阻滞的产妇比例在DL组(94.7%)显著高于SL组(82.5%)(P=0.039)。与SL组相比,DL组术后首次镇痛需求延迟了2.5小时。

结论

与传统的单平面TAPB相比,双平面TAPB产生更广泛的皮肤感觉阻滞和更好的术后镇痛效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5848/12125607/03c4b05a96d1/JPR-18-2689-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验