Suppr超能文献

对比减重手术后肋缘下前锯肌平面阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞的术后镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Comparison of postoperative analgesia effects between subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Aug 3;25(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08359-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the prevalence of obesity is on the rise annually. Bariatric surgery stands out as the most efficacious approach for addressing obesity. Obese patients are more prone to experience moderate to severe pain after surgery due to lower pain thresholds. Regional block, as an important component of multimodal analgesia in bariatric surgery, is crucial in reducing opioid consumption and alleviating postoperative pain in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has gained widespread utilization in bariatric surgery; however, its limitation of inadequate reduction of visceral pain in obese patients remains a significant concern. Therefore, it is imperative to explore new and more efficient strategies for analgesia. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has emerged as a popular nerve block in recent years, frequently utilized in conjunction with general anesthesia for abdominal surgery. In the cadaver study of QLB, it was confirmed that the dye level could reach up to T6 when using the subcostal anterior quadratus lumborum muscle approach, which could effectively reduce the incision pain and visceral pain of bariatric surgery patients during the perioperative period. However, there is currently a lack of research on the use of subcostal anterior QLB in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Our study aims to investigate whether subcostal anterior QLB can provide superior perioperative analgesic efficacy for bariatric surgery under general anesthesia compared to TAPB, leading to reduced postoperative opioid consumption and a lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

METHODS AND DESIGN

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial aiming to recruit 66 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: subcostal anterior QLB group (n = 33) and TAPB group (n = 33). The study aims to investigate the efficacy of subcostal anterior QLB and TAPB in obese patients who are scheduled to undergo bariatric surgery. Our primary outcome is to observe the amount of opioids used in the two groups 24 h after operation. The secondary outcomes included VAS of pain during rest/activity after operation, the type and dose of additional analgesics, the occurrence and severity of PONV, the type and dose of additional antiemetic drugs, postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) time, time of first postoperative exhaust, time to first out of bed activity, time to first liquid diet and postoperative admission days.

DISCUSSION

Opioid analgesics are prone to causing adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, especially in obese patients. Multimodal analgesia, including nerve block, can effectively reduce the dose of opioids and alleviate their adverse effects. Currently, TAPB is the most prevalent nerve block analgesia method for abdominal surgery. Recent studies have indicated that subcostal anterior QLB offers advantages over TAPB, including a wider block plane, faster onset, and longer maintenance time. It is not clear which of the two nerve block analgesia techniques is better for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Our objective in this investigation is to elucidate the superior method between TAPB and subcostal anterior QLB for postoperative pain management in bariatric surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR ChiCTR2300070556. Registered on 17 April 2023.

摘要

背景

目前肥胖症的患病率呈逐年上升趋势。减重手术是解决肥胖问题最有效的方法。肥胖患者由于疼痛阈值较低,术后更容易出现中重度疼痛。区域阻滞作为减重手术多模式镇痛的重要组成部分,对于减少阿片类药物的消耗和缓解减重手术后的疼痛至关重要。腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在减重手术中得到了广泛应用;然而,其在肥胖患者中内脏疼痛缓解效果不足仍然是一个重要的问题。因此,探索新的、更有效的镇痛策略势在必行。竖脊肌平面阻滞(QLB)近年来成为一种流行的神经阻滞方法,常与全身麻醉联合应用于腹部手术。在 QLB 的尸体研究中,证实采用肋缘下前锯肌入路时,染料水平可达到 T6,可有效减少减重手术患者围手术期切口疼痛和内脏疼痛。然而,目前关于在减重手术患者中使用肋缘下前 QLB 的研究还很少。我们的研究旨在探讨在全身麻醉下,与 TAPB 相比,肋缘下前 QLB 是否能为减重手术提供更好的围手术期镇痛效果,从而减少术后阿片类药物的消耗和降低术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率。

方法和设计

这是一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,旨在招募 66 名接受减重手术的患者。参与者将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到两组:肋缘下前 QLB 组(n=33)和 TAPB 组(n=33)。本研究旨在探讨肋缘下前 QLB 和 TAPB 在拟行减重手术的肥胖患者中的疗效。我们的主要结局是观察两组患者术后 24 小时内使用的阿片类药物的量。次要结局包括术后静息/活动时的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、额外镇痛药物的类型和剂量、PONV 的发生和严重程度、额外止吐药物的类型和剂量、术后麻醉恢复室(PACU)时间、首次术后排气时间、首次下床活动时间、首次液体饮食时间和术后住院天数。

讨论

阿片类镇痛药容易引起恶心、呕吐和呼吸抑制等不良反应,尤其是在肥胖患者中。多模式镇痛,包括神经阻滞,可以有效地减少阿片类药物的剂量并减轻其不良反应。目前,TAPB 是腹部手术最常用的神经阻滞镇痛方法。最近的研究表明,肋缘下前 QLB 比 TAPB 具有优势,包括阻滞平面更广、起效更快、维持时间更长。目前尚不清楚这两种神经阻滞镇痛技术哪种对减重手术后的镇痛效果更好。我们的研究目的是阐明 TAPB 和肋缘下前 QLB 哪种方法更适合减重手术的术后疼痛管理。

试验注册

ChiCTR ChiCTR2300070556。于 2023 年 4 月 17 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbd2/11297760/1502423a0143/13063_2024_8359_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验