• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制造业企业ESG评级差异对碳排放强度的影响研究

Research on the impact of the ESG rating divergence of manufacturing firms on carbon emission intensity.

作者信息

Deng Jialu, Lin Wenhe, Huang Jiuzhen, Cai Yunying, Wang Wenbao

机构信息

College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

College of Construction Engineering, Fuzhou Polytechnic, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0323929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323929. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323929
PMID:40455705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12129225/
Abstract

The task of reducing carbon emission intensity is difficult for manufacturing firms in China under the national goal of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality". Numerous studies have confirmed the inhibitory impact of ESG performance on carbon emission intensity; nevertheless, the significance of ESG rating divergence as a derivative of ESG ratings has been neglected. Therefore, this study selects Chinese A-share listed manufacturing firms from 2011-2022 as a research sample and empirically examines the impact of ESG rating divergence on the carbon emission intensity of Chinese manufacturing firms via a higher-order fixed effects model. The study revealed that (1) ESG rating divergence creates disincentives for manufacturing firms to increase carbon emission intensity; (2) ESG rating divergence leads to an increase in corporate carbon emissions by inhibiting incentives for green innovation; and (3) mitigating financial constraints and enhancing digital transformation in enterprises diminishes the impact of ESG rating divergence on the carbon emissions of manufacturing firms. Furthermore, enterprise digital transformation can exert a moderating influence on both the initial and subsequent stages of the "ESG performance[Formula: see text]green innovation[Formula: see text]carbon emission intensity" pathway, predominantly in the initial phase. (4) The impact of ESG rating divergence on carbon emission intensity varies depending on the ownership, industry, geography, and level of competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises. The findings not only provide empirical evidence on the feasibility of expanding the standardization of ESG ratings within China's regulatory framework but also provide useful inspiration for Chinese firms to reduce their carbon emission intensity and achieve sustainable development.

摘要

在“碳达峰、碳中和”的国家目标下,中国制造业企业降低碳排放强度的任务艰巨。众多研究证实了企业社会责任(ESG)表现对碳排放强度的抑制作用;然而,作为ESG评级衍生物的ESG评级差异的重要性却被忽视了。因此,本研究选取2011 - 2022年中国A股上市制造业企业作为研究样本,通过高阶固定效应模型实证检验ESG评级差异对中国制造业企业碳排放强度的影响。研究发现:(1)ESG评级差异抑制了制造业企业提高碳排放强度的动机;(2)ESG评级差异通过抑制绿色创新动机导致企业碳排放增加;(3)缓解企业财务约束和加强企业数字化转型可减少ESG评级差异对制造业企业碳排放的影响。此外,企业数字化转型在“ESG绩效[公式:见正文]绿色创新[公式:见正文]碳排放强度”路径的初始阶段和后续阶段均能发挥调节作用,主要是在初始阶段。(4)ESG评级差异对碳排放强度的影响因制造业企业的所有权性质、行业、地理位置和竞争力水平而异。研究结果不仅为在中国监管框架内扩大ESG评级标准化的可行性提供了实证依据,也为中国企业降低碳排放强度、实现可持续发展提供了有益启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51b4/12129225/a8719ad35580/pone.0323929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51b4/12129225/a8719ad35580/pone.0323929.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51b4/12129225/a8719ad35580/pone.0323929.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on the impact of the ESG rating divergence of manufacturing firms on carbon emission intensity.制造业企业ESG评级差异对碳排放强度的影响研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0323929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323929. eCollection 2025.
2
Manufacturing enterprises move towards sustainable development: ESG performance, market-based environmental regulation, and green technological innovation.制造企业走向可持续发展:ESG绩效、基于市场的环境规制与绿色技术创新。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;372:123244. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123244. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance of Chinese manufacturing state-owned enterprises?-Based on the mediating mechanism of dynamic capabilities and the moderating mechanism of the institutional environment.数字转型如何影响中国制造业国有企业的 ESG 绩效?——基于动态能力的中介机制和制度环境的调节机制。
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0301864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301864. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of digital technology innovation on carbon intensity: evidence from China's manufacturing A-share listed enterprises.数字技术创新对碳强度的影响:来自中国制造业 A 股上市公司的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jun;31(28):41084-41106. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33766-0. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
5
Technology empowerment: Digital transformation and enterprise ESG performance-Evidence from China's manufacturing sector.技术赋能:数字化转型与企业 ESG 绩效——来自中国制造业的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0302029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302029. eCollection 2024.
6
A study on the impact of ESG rating on green technology innovation in enterprises: An empirical study based on informal environmental governance.企业 ESG 评级对绿色技术创新的影响研究:基于非正式环境治理的实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;358:120878. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120878. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to green innovation? Micro-level evidence from China.企业数字化转型是否有助于绿色创新?来自中国的微观证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122609. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122609. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
8
Investor attention and ESG performance: Lessons from China's manufacturing industry.投资者关注与企业社会责任表现:来自中国制造业的经验教训
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;355:120483. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120483. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
9
The short board effect of ESG rating and corporate green innovation activities.ESG 评级与企业绿色创新活动的短木板效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 19;19(3):e0299795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299795. eCollection 2024.
10
How does green manufacturing enhance corporate ESG performance? - Empirical evidence from machine learning and text analysis.绿色制造如何提升企业的环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效?——来自机器学习和文本分析的实证证据
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122933. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122933. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Corporate digital transformation and carbon emission intensity: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China.企业数字转型与碳排放强度:来自中国上市公司的实证证据
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0313870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313870. eCollection 2024.
2
The impact of ESG performance on corporate sustainable growth from the perspective of carbon sentiment.从碳情感角度看 ESG 绩效对企业可持续增长的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121913. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121913. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Senior executive characteristics: Impact on ESG practices and corporate valuation relationship.
高管特征:对 ESG 实践和企业估值关系的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0303081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303081. eCollection 2024.
4
Does digital-industrial technology integration reduce corporate carbon emissions?数字-工业技术融合是否能降低企业碳排放?
Environ Res. 2024 Sep 15;257:119313. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119313. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
The short board effect of ESG rating and corporate green innovation activities.ESG 评级与企业绿色创新活动的短木板效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 19;19(3):e0299795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299795. eCollection 2024.
6
Shifting focus from end-of-pipe treatment to source control: ESG ratings' impact on corporate green innovation.从末端治理转向源头控制:ESG 评级对企业绿色创新的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120409. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120409. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
ESG performance, auditing quality, and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China.企业社会责任表现、审计质量与投资效率:来自中国的实证证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 12;13:948674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948674. eCollection 2022.
8
The role of digitalization on green economic growth: Does industrial structure optimization and green innovation matter?数字化对绿色经济增长的作用:产业结构优化和绿色创新是否重要?
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt A):116504. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
Blue sky defense in low-carbon pilot cities: A spatial spillover perspective of carbon emission efficiency.低碳试点城市蓝天保卫战:碳排放效率的空间溢出视角
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 10;846:157509. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157509. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
What factors determine the survival of green innovative enterprises in China? -- A method based on fsQCA.哪些因素决定了中国绿色创新企业的生存?——一种基于模糊集定性比较分析的方法。
Technol Soc. 2020 Aug;62:101314. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101314. Epub 2020 Jul 9.