Wei Yu-Jung Jenny, Winterstein Almut G, Schmidt Siegfried, Fillingim Roger B, Daniels Michael J, DeKosky Steven T, Schmidt Stephan
Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2025 Jun 2;22(6):e1004620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004620. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The safety of pharmacokinetic opioid-antidepressant interactions may be affected by the sequence in which the drug is initiated. Previous literature showed that initiation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6-inhibiting versus CYP2D6-neutral antidepressants concomitantly with existing CYP2D6-metabolized opioids (i.e., antidepressant-triggered interaction) was associated with heightened risks of adverse outcomes (e.g., worsening pain). However, little is known about whether and to what extent the risks exist when CYP2D6-metabolized opioids are initiated on existing antidepressants (i.e., opioid-triggered interaction), a more common pattern of concomitant use of these two drugs. The study aims to examine the association of initiation of CYP2D6-metabolized opioids with risks of adverse outcomes among older nursing home residents who already received antidepressants.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a 100% Medicare nursing home sample linked to Medicare claims and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021. Participants included long-term care residents 65 years of age or older who initiated CYP2D6-metabolized opioids while already receiving antidepressants for at least 30 days. The key exposure was the use of CYP2D6-inhibiting (versus CYP2D6-neutral) antidepressants concomitantly with CYP2D6-metabolized opioids, with day 1 of antidepressant-opioid concomitant use designated as cohort entry. Patients were followed from cohort entry until the end of 1 year, nursing home discharge, death, or study end (12/31/2021). Seven adverse outcomes included worsening pain, physical function, and depression, and counts of pain-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits, opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid overdose (OD). We identified 127,200 older nursing home long-term residents who initiated CYP2D6-metabolized opioids while already receiving antidepressants (mean [SD] age, 84.4 [8.7] years). After covariate adjustment via inverse probability of treatment weighting, use of CYP2D6-inhibiting (versus CYP2D6-neutral) antidepressants concomitantly with CYP2D6-metabolized opioids was associated with a higher risk of worsening pain (relative risk:1.04 [95% CI, 1.02, 1.06]; P < 0.001; risk difference (RD): 1.1% [95% CI, 0.6%, 1.6%]) and a higher incidence rate of pain-related hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR]:1.13 [95% CI, 1.04, 1.22]; P = 0.003; RD: 1.21 [95% CI, 0.39, 1.89] per 1,000 patient-years) and pain-related ED visits (IRR = 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07, 1.29]; P = 0.003; RD: 0.85 [95% CI, 0.29, 1.41] per 1,000 patient-years), with no difference in physical function, depression, OUD, and OD. Main study limitations included unmeasured confounding and limited generalizability.
This cohort study of older nursing home residents showed that initiation of CYP2D6-metabolized opioids on existing CYP2D6-inhibiting (versus CYP2D6-neutral) antidepressants was associated with increased risk of worsening pain, pain-related hospitalizations, and pain-related ED visits, although the relative and absolute risks are small to moderate. Clinicians should be aware of potential worsening pain and hospital and ED visits due to pain among patients who used CYP2D6-metabolizing opioids concomitantly with antidepressants, particularly those with CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants.
药代动力学中阿片类药物与抗抑郁药相互作用的安全性可能受药物起始顺序的影响。既往文献表明,细胞色素P450(CYP)2D6抑制性抗抑郁药与CYP2D6中性抗抑郁药与现有的CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物同时起始使用(即抗抑郁药引发的相互作用)与不良结局风险增加(如疼痛加重)相关。然而,对于在现有抗抑郁药基础上起始使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物(即阿片类药物引发的相互作用)时风险是否存在以及程度如何,人们知之甚少,而这是这两种药物更常见的联合使用模式。本研究旨在探讨在已服用抗抑郁药的老年疗养院居民中,起始使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物与不良结局风险之间的关联。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了2010年1月1日至2021年12月31日与医疗保险理赔和最低数据集(MDS)评估相关联的100%医疗保险疗养院样本。参与者包括65岁及以上的长期护理居民,他们在已服用抗抑郁药至少30天的情况下起始使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物。关键暴露因素是CYP2D6抑制性(相对于CYP2D6中性)抗抑郁药与CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物同时使用,将抗抑郁药 - 阿片类药物同时使用的第1天指定为队列进入时间。患者从队列进入开始随访,直至1年结束、疗养院出院、死亡或研究结束(2021年12月31日)。七个不良结局包括疼痛加重、身体功能、抑郁,以及疼痛相关住院和急诊科(ED)就诊次数、阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)和阿片类药物过量(OD)。我们确定了127200名在已服用抗抑郁药时起始使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物的老年疗养院长期居民(平均[标准差]年龄,84.4[8.7]岁)。通过逆概率处理加权进行协变量调整后,CYP2D6抑制性(相对于CYP2D6中性)抗抑郁药与CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物同时使用与疼痛加重风险较高相关(相对风险:1.04[95%置信区间,1.02,1.06];P<0.001;风险差异(RD):1.1%[95%置信区间,0.6%,1.6%]),以及疼痛相关住院发生率较高(发生率比[IRR]:1.13[95%置信区间,1.04,1.22];P = 0.003;RD:每1000患者年1.21[95%置信区间,0.39,1.89])和疼痛相关ED就诊发生率较高(IRR = 1.17[95%置信区间,1.07,1.29];P = 0.003;RD:每1000患者年0.85[95%置信区间,0.29,1.41]),而在身体功能、抑郁、OUD和OD方面无差异。主要研究局限性包括未测量的混杂因素和有限的可推广性。
这项针对老年疗养院居民的队列研究表明,在现有的CYP2D6抑制性(相对于CYP2D6中性)抗抑郁药基础上起始使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物与疼痛加重、疼痛相关住院和疼痛相关ED就诊风险增加相关,尽管相对风险和绝对风险为小到中度。临床医生应意识到在同时使用CYP2D6代谢型阿片类药物和抗抑郁药的患者中,尤其是使用CYP2D6抑制性抗抑郁药的患者,可能出现疼痛加重以及因疼痛导致的住院和ED就诊情况。